Mandalay Bay owner files complaint against victims of Las Vegas shooting

Do you consider anyone other than the shooter Stephen Paddock responsible for this tragedy?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 5 100.0%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5

NewsVine_Mariyam

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2018
Messages
11,673
Reaction score
8,133
Points
1,230
Location
The Beautiful Pacific Northwest
The complaint doesn't seek money from them, but instead seeks to have their cases moved to federal court — where a 2002 federal act may provide more protection for MGM.

The company that owns the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino and the Route 91 Harvest festival venue in Las Vegas where dozens were killed and hundreds of others injured in a mass shooting has taken legal action — against the victims.

MGM Resorts International filed complaints in Nevada and California federal courts last Friday. The company does not seek compensation from survivors of the October 2017 rampage; instead, they insist MGM was not at fault for the massacre in the first place, citing a 2002 federal act.

That legislation, the Support Anti-Terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies, or Safety Act, protects corporations in the event of mass attacks committed on U.S. soil, provided services certified by the Department of Homeland Security were deployed.

In the case of the Las Vegas shooting, gunman Stephen Paddock fired shot after shot from the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay resort down on a crowd of about 22,000. All told, 58 people were killed and more than 500 were injured, making it the worst mass shooting in modern American history.

But because MGM had hired Contemporary Services Corporation, a security vendor for the concert whose services had been certified by the Department of Homeland Security, it claims it followed the requirements of the Safety Act.

As a result, MGM wants the cases moved from state court to federal court, where it can make its case under the liability protection of the Safety Act.​
 
I understand, the fact that the perpetrator of this horrific event is dead does nothing to ease the pain or repair the damage of the carnage he inflicted. But how is this the fault of MGM?
 
I understand, the fact that the perpetrator of this horrific event is dead does nothing to ease the pain or repair the damage of the carnage he inflicted. But how is this the fault of MGM?

It's not. Hotels don't pat down guests or search luggage. That's not negligent.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom