Man Who Vowed To Release Epstein Files Berates Idiots For Believing There Are Epstein Files

If you say so. Seems to me this is yet another Red Herring.

They got rid of the evidence......and then.....they started asking for the evidence knowing it was destroyed.

But when Biden was in office....they were too busy.


She's full of shit
 
And even if he's guilty, I support voting for him over Kamala.
.Every saint has a past and every sinner has a future

It's true that every saint has a past and every sinner has a future.

However, those words are normally stated in the context of a person who was once a sinner then became a 'saint' (which as you know doesn't mean perfect, the word saint in this context means born again.)

But if anyone (including Trump) doesn't at all acknowledge that they ever did anything wrong, and even lies or covers up their past, then they're not a saint. Because part of being redeemed is acknowledging one's true spiritual condition and one's actions in the past. I mean, I don't see how that can be denied...from a biblical standpoint. :dunno:

That was a wordy and long way of saying I don't see how that statement applies to Trump. I'm not saying he's guilty... but just going on what you said, IF he is guilty and doubles and triples down on it and denies it all... why would you support that, or continue to support any politician who would do that?
 
Prove it..

Careful what you ask for....

giphy-downsized.gif


I'm guessing this is more 'locker room talk'
 
Where's the audio?

It's not necessary.

People with reasonable faculties can simply use Trump's past comments on the record and the courtroom evidence of his propensity to commit sexual assault and reach their own conclusions.

Donald Trump's own son wanted the release of the files.

So did Dan Bongino.

So did Kash Patel.

So did Theo Von.

So did JD Vance.

Pam Bondi said there was a list on her desk.

If you want my honest opinion, I'm guessing there were some Democrats' names (Bill Clinton, for example) who were in the files. The Dems knew this and had the common sense to shut the **** up about it. MAGA should have kept their ******* mouths shut. Then they wouldn't be in this situation. But here we are.
 
However, those words are normally stated in the context of a person who was once a sinner then became a 'saint' (which as you know doesn't mean perfect, the word saint in this context means born again.)
I don't think he's the same person he was. Even so, UNTIL he's convicted of a REAL crime, this isn't an issue I care about. And until that time he's not GUILTY. My only focus right now is whether he succeeds in cleaning up Bidens mess
 
Where were you during the Biden years

Oh piss off! Biden never mentioned Epstein because he had already been convicted and offed himself (or did he?! serious question now).

It's ******* stupider-than-pig-shit MAGAs that kept demanding to see the Epstein files.

You all chased the ******* car all this time and now you finally caught it.

So tell me: how do tires taste?!
 
I don't think he's the same person he was. Even so, UNTIL he's convicted of a REAL crime, this isn't an issue I care about. My only focus right now is whether he succeeds in cleaning up Bidens mess

I'm fairly certain that he's never going to get convicted. I believe he's "protected" in the exact same way that the Clintons have been protected. But on the other hand, I could be wrong on that one because every once in a while the PTSB will 'sacrifice' certain politicians who they no longer have use for. So what ends up happening with Trump remains to be seen.

Also, this may be a Captain Obvious thing to say, but a conviction or lack thereof isn't what determines someone's actual guilt or innocence. Al Capone was only ever convicted of tax evasion.

And again, Mr. Slick Clinton wasn't convicted of crimes but he's one of the most corrupt individuals to ever set foot in the Oval Office.
 
I'm fairly certain that he's never going to get convicted. I believe he's "protected" in the exact same way that the Clintons have been protected. But on the other hand, I could be wrong on that one because every once in a while the PTSB will 'sacrifice' certain politicians who they no longer have use for. So what ends up happening with Trump remains to be seen.

Also, this may be a Captain Obvious thing to say, but a conviction or lack thereof isn't what determines someone's actual guilt or innocence. Al Capone was only ever convicted of tax evasion.

And again, Mr. Slick Clinton wasn't convicted of crimes but he's one of the most corrupt individuals to ever set foot in the Oval Office.

You and I are on the same wavelength here.

For the record, even though I cannot ******* stand MAGA, there's no question that there are Democrats (political figures and their donors) who are probably implicated in the Epstein files. So just in case we weren't clear, yes, Dems have something to hide here, too.

The difference is...the Dems were smart enough to keep their ******* mouths shut.
 
Also, this may be a Captain Obvious thing to say, but a conviction or lack thereof isn't what determines someone's actual guilt or innocence
I was careful to say he's "not guilty" until he's convicted of a crime.

And again, this is a thing I've always noticed with you and a few others who claim to not be Democrats, but you only take up this cause when Trump is in office. Same with several others. Where were you guys when Biden was in office?

While I hoped this list would come out under Trump, I didn't fuss over this topic when Biden was in office or now. Yes it's important and it does say something about Trump's character but it wasn't a main issue to me years ago and it still isn't. But the Democrats and several of you are suddenly trying to make hay out of this issue.
 
15th post
View attachment 1137074View attachment 1137073

/----/ That photo proves Trump judged a Look of the Year competition in 1991.
Teen models, powerful men and private dinners: when Trump hosted Look of the Year.
Now prove he was at Epstein Island like you were asked.
Well....we all know that Trump cannot be seen standing around beautiful women....because she might be forced to grab them in the *****.

Quite a change from Biden.....who was known to go around sniffing small children. Thus the reason for the false rape allegations against Trump.
 
Where were you guys when Biden was in office?

Already explained this. You're just not that bright to differentiate the very obvious differences. Biden and his surrogates never made Epstein one of their campaign themes. Why would they? Epstein was not only convicted, he was dead. Ghislaine Maxwell was eventually convicted. Case closed. Well, until dumber-than-pig-shit MAGAs demanded to know what was in the "files" or who was on the "list".

In reality, they wanted to know whose names were mentioned during the investigations. They didn't really want to know because they assumed that if they won the election, they'd have the ability to control the situation. The problem is, a lot of the people they lied to - from voters to podcasters - believed them when they said there was a 'there' there.


While I hoped this list would come out under Trump, I didn't fuss over this topic when Biden was in office or now. Yes it's important and it does say something about Trump's character but it wasn't a main issue to me years ago and it still isn't. But the Democrats and several of you are suddenly trying to make hay out of this issue.

Listen, you total ******* moron, the Democrats never brought this up. MAGAs brought this up. Now they're panicking because they realize that it makes MAGA looks like shit.

But this is nothing new. Conservatives are always running campaigns about liberal immorality when in reality they are the very things they accuse liberals of being -- and usually worse.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom