Man In Charlie Kirk Freedom Shirt Arrested For Decking ANTIFA Member

[ChristisKing]

Evil and hatred. Like calling people you disagree with scum?

It is scum to say that you're glad that somebody was assassinated whether you agree with their politics or not. Lower than scum. Now, I'm not actually advocating for anybody to get murdered but it should be legally acceptable to take these low lives out.

 

[pknopp]

Evil and hatred are calling people you disagree with Hitler and fascist. That false hate speech contributed to Kirk’s murder.

But I guess "Scum" is OK.

CNN Host Plays Compilation of Trump Calling Enemies ‘Fascist’ After Guest Complains Name-Calling Leads to Violence

The CNN host played several clips of Trump calling his opponents communists and fascists after Ben Ferguson complained name-calling was leading to violence.

www.yahoo.com

 

[Paddlefoot]

They had to carry the fat drug addict off after he lost the fight.

 

[pknopp]

It is scum to say that you're glad that somebody was assassinated whether you agree with their politics or not. Lower than scum. Now, I'm not actually advocating for anybody to get murdered but it should be legally acceptable to take these low lives out.

Seems you are advocating for it.

 

[buttercup]

It is scum to say that you're glad that somebody was assassinated whether you agree with their politics or not. Lower than scum. Now, I'm not actually advocating for anybody to get murdered but it should be legally acceptable to take these low lives out.

So in your view it should be legal to kill that "Augustine_" poster, for that vile comment he posted about Charlie Kirk? (most likely just to get a rise out of you)

Yes or no?

 

[ChristisKing]

But I guess "Scum" is OK.

CNN Host Plays Compilation of Trump Calling Enemies ‘Fascist’ After Guest Complains Name-Calling Leads to Violence

The CNN host played several clips of Trump calling his opponents communists and fascists after Ben Ferguson complained name-calling was leading to violence.

www.yahoo.com

How does that have anything to do with what I'm talking about?

Seems you are advocating for it.

Nope! I'm merely suggesting that I wish that our country could take out the garbage. Finally I have somebody else here agree with me on why do these filthy disgusting creatures get to have the ability to have air in their lungs and speak their minds when Charlie Kirk does not anymore?

 

[ChristisKing]

So in your view it should be legal to kill that "Augustine_" poster, for that vile comment he posted about Charlie Kirk? (most likely just to get a rise out of you)

Yes or no?

Tongue in cheek. I can use it too.

 

[buttercup]

Tongue in cheek. I can use it too.

But you've been saying that, or something similar to that on numerous threads, repeatedly, over the last week or two.

So you didn't mean it any of those times?

 

[ChristisKing]

But you've been saying that, or something similar to that on numerous threads, repeatedly, over the last week or two.

So you didn't mean it any of those times?

Well that's a tough question. Again, why do they get to have air in their lungs and speak their minds when Charlie Kirk no longer has either ability? They might possibly be one of those braindead brainwashed liberals but still.

 

[ChristisKing]

Oh and I will admit at first that Mac-7's comment made me cringe at first that two wrongs don't make a right and part of me still feels like that too, but the other part of me says that somebody celebrating the assassination of another cannot be trusted.

 

[justoffal]

Evil and hatred are calling people you disagree with Hitler and fascist. That false hate speech contributed to Kirk’s murder.

Yep

 

[pknopp]

Yep

CNN Host Plays Compilation of Trump Calling Enemies ‘Fascist’ After Guest Complains Name-Calling Leads to Violence

 

[buttercup]

Well that's a tough question. Again, why do they get to have air in their lungs and speak their minds when Charlie Kirk no longer has either ability? They might possibly be one of those braindead brainwashed liberals but still.

It shouldn't be a tough question. You either support killing people for saying disgusting things or you don't. On many threads over the last week or two, you SEEM to be promoting just that.

If that's not your position, then please be more clear. But as of now, I'm sorry but what you've been doing in my view is insane... and extremely dangerous. You've been advocating for more violence, murder and civil war. And as I keep telling you, you're playing right into the hands of the corrupt powers-that-be who WANT that exact response from us, for their own underhanded purposes.

 

[Unkotare]

Bald guy thought he had moves. He did not.

 

[ChristisKing]

It shouldn't be a tough question. You either support killing people for saying disgusting things or you don't. On many threads over the last week or two, you SEEM to be promoting just that.

If that's not your position, then please be more clear. But as of now, I'm sorry but what you've been doing in my view is insane... and extremely dangerous. You've been pushing for more violence, murder and civil war. And as I keep telling you, you're playing right into the hands of the corrupt powers-that-be who WANT that exact response from us, for their own underhanded purposes.

Again I'm not pushing for murder so I'm sorry if it sounded like that and I'm no longer looking for Civil War. I tagged you last night telling you that. As for killing people for saying disgusting things not really... However it just doesn't seem right that they get to live while Charlie Kirk is dead was my point.

 

[ChristisKing]

Now killing people for saying threatening things I'm all for getting that to be legal.

 

[justoffal]

Bald guy thought he had moves. He did not.

I dunno...his ass sat down in a very coordinated way...

 

[ChristisKing]

Now killing people for saying threatening things I'm all for getting that to be legal.

Why is everybody shocked and upset about this comment? That would be considered self-defense NOT murder.

 

[justoffal]

Why is everybody shocked and upset about this comment? That would be considered self-defense NOT murder.

2/3 of the planet practices that doctrine

 

[ChristisKing]

2/3 of the planet practices that doctrine

Yeah but the problem is that isn't legal and the thing is I'm still on the fence about what Mac-7 was saying to that one troll that too bad it wasn't them that was killed instead of Charlie Kirk as that wouldn't be legal and would be considered murder, but at the same time do people like that really deserve to have air in their lungs and speak their mind when Charlie Kirk was silenced for speaking his mind? So in other words is it justified thinking like that in your opinion?