Malicious Anti-White Lawfare in NC

Captain Creeper

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2025
Messages
2,317
Reaction score
2,732
Points
1,903

The story reads like a dystopian B movie. The poor dude is sitting in his car when another car full of Mexicans slams into him. Having just been assaulted, the white guy apprehends a couple of the Mexican (who are most likely in the country illegally) and holds them at gunpoint until police arrive, all in compliance with the law. The rest of the Mexicans fled in their car.

I note that this occurred in North Carolina, which we know has been acutely damaged by leftist garbage politicians.

Instead of the police taking the Mexicans into custody, they took the white guy into custody for pointing his gun at them and “assaulting” one or both of them. Clearly, the guy was exercising his right of self-defense. But the leftist state is pursuing criminal charges against him.
 
//* Saw this on GP days ago. but my hands too tired to link them all. *//

driving his pickup truck through a parking lot late at night when a car from the roadway lost control, jumped the grass, and t-boned Herber's truck.

Driver fled. Others held for Police. "Kidnapping" charged to the guy who got hit also? Unless GP was "lying"? Saw a whole list of charges on the guy. What a country these Stain create.
 
Last edited:
//* Saw this on GP days ago. but my hands too tired to link them all. *//

driving his pickup truck through a parking lot late at night when a car from the roadway lost control, jumped the grass, and t-boned Herber's truck.

Driver fled. Others held for Police. "Kidnapping" charged to the guy who got hit also? Unless GP was "lying"? Saw a whole list of charges on the guy. What a country these Stain create.
The guy’s wife was in the truck with him and was apparently hurt in the collision.
 

The story reads like a dystopian B movie. The poor dude is sitting in his car when another car full of Mexicans slams into him. Having just been assaulted, the white guy apprehends a couple of the Mexican (who are most likely in the country illegally) and holds them at gunpoint until police arrive, all in compliance with the law. The rest of the Mexicans fled in their car.

I note that this occurred in North Carolina, which we know has been acutely damaged by leftist garbage politicians.

Instead of the police taking the Mexicans into custody, they took the white guy into custody for pointing his gun at them and “assaulting” one or both of them. Clearly, the guy was exercising his right of self-defense. But the leftist state is pursuing criminal charges against him.

Poor defenseless White Asshole Racists. They get what they ******* deserve.
 

The story reads like a dystopian B movie. The poor dude is sitting in his car when another car full of Mexicans slams into him. Having just been assaulted, the white guy apprehends a couple of the Mexican (who are most likely in the country illegally) and holds them at gunpoint until police arrive, all in compliance with the law. The rest of the Mexicans fled in their car.

I note that this occurred in North Carolina, which we know has been acutely damaged by leftist garbage politicians.

Instead of the police taking the Mexicans into custody, they took the white guy into custody for pointing his gun at them and “assaulting” one or both of them. Clearly, the guy was exercising his right of self-defense. But the leftist state is pursuing criminal charges against him.
Austin Herber was involved in an auto accident. The driver of the other car fled on foot.

How the **** does that somehow give Austin the right to hold the innocent passengers of the other vehicle at gunpoint?

It doesn't.

Yet according to the witnesses he forced the 2 innocent injured spics to the ground at gunpoint. He had no right to do that. And he likely called them spics or wetbacks or something when he did it, adding an ethnic intimidation element to his crime that he committed while brandishing a firearm.

That's kidnapping.
 
Last edited:
Austin Herber was involved in an auto accident. The driver of the other car fled on foot.

How the **** does that somehow give Austin the right to hold the innocent passengers of the other vehicle at gunpoint?

It doesn't.

Yet according to the witnesses he forced the 2 innocent injured spics to the ground at gunpoint. He had no right to do that. And he likely called them spics or wetbacks or something when he did it, adding an ethnic intimidation element to his crime that he committed while brandishing a firearm.

That's kidnapping.
The “spics”, as you call them were, I assume, driving recklessly, which can be a crime. Assault with a vehicle can be criminal. Fleeing the scene of an accident … and so on. The Mexicans committed a crime and the dude was executing a citizens arrest.
 
The “spics”, as you call them were, I assume, driving recklessly, which can be a crime. Assault with a vehicle can be criminal. Fleeing the scene of an accident … and so on. The Mexicans committed a crime and the dude was executing a citizens arrest.
You're a ******* moron.

Only one of the spics was driving. Austin did not go after the driver.

He held the ******* passengers at gunpoint. The injured INNOCENT passengers. WTF? :wtf:

There is no possible justification for that. Not in a million years.

Quit being a retarded moron, creep.
 
Last edited:
You're a ******* moron.

Only one of the spics was driving. Austin did not go after the driver.

He held the ******* passengers at gunpoint. The injured INNOCENT passengers. WTF? :wtf:

There is no possible justification for that. Not in a million years.

Quit being a retarded moron, creep.
Why don’t to slither onto a magic carpet, Muhammad, and fly up my ass! Neither you nor I were there. But given that this dude pulled a gun on them suggests to me that he was fearful for his life.

You cannot judge occurrences out of context, you deranged douche.
 
Why don’t to slither onto a magic carpet, Muhammad, and fly up my ass! Neither you nor I were there. But given that this dude pulled a gun on them suggests to me that he was fearful for his life.

You cannot judge occurrences out of context, you deranged douche.
Go back to Stormfront, creep.

The context is that there was an auto accident and Mr. road rage pulled a gun and held innocent people against their will.

That's is kidnapping. Open and shut case. Zero plea bargains will be offered because it's an easy conviction.

The only reason you are bitching is because of their race.
 
The “spics”, as you call them were, I assume, driving recklessly, which can be a crime. Assault with a vehicle can be criminal. Fleeing the scene of an accident … and so on. The Mexicans committed a crime and the dude was executing a citizens arrest.

Prove it you so-called "Christian" Asshole. You post hate on Christmas Eve. Disgusting.
 
[snipped]
...they took the white guy into custody for pointing his gun at them and “assaulting” one or both of them. Clearly, the guy was exercising his right of self-defense. But the leftist state is pursuing criminal charges against him.
When a person is attempting to defend themself or another person, they are attempting to PREVENT the assailant from inflicting severe bodily harm or DEATH to the defender or the person they are defending.

Taking your firearm and using it to force compliance is whatever it is that you want them to do is what criminals do and is NOT DEFENSE, self or otherwise, it's retaliation.

I understand your sentiments, but it doesn't help if you don't understand our laws and why they are written as well as enforced the way they are.
 
The “spics”, as you call them were, I assume, driving recklessly, which can be a crime. Assault with a vehicle can be criminal. Fleeing the scene of an accident … and so on. The Mexicans committed a crime and the dude was executing a citizens arrest.
Only one person can drive a car, and it appears that person ran from the scene.
 
Go back to Stormfront, creep.

The context is that there was an auto accident and Mr. road rage pulled a gun and held innocent people against their will.

That's is kidnapping. Open and shut case. Zero plea bargains will be offered because it's an easy conviction.

The only reason you are bitching is because of their race.
You do not know that.
 
15th post
When a person is attempting to defend themself or another person, they are attempting to PREVENT the assailant from inflicting severe bodily harm or DEATH to the defender or the person they are defending.

Taking your firearm and using it to force compliance is whatever it is that you want them to do is what criminals do and is NOT DEFENSE, self or otherwise, it's retaliation.

I understand your sentiments, but it doesn't help if you don't understand our laws and why they are written as well as enforced the way they are.
Citizen’s arrest
 
Austin Herber was involved in an auto accident. The driver of the other car fled on foot.

How the **** does that somehow give Austin the right to hold the innocent passengers of the other vehicle at gunpoint?

It doesn't.

Yet according to the witnesses he forced the 2 innocent injured spics to the ground at gunpoint. He had no right to do that. And he likely called them spics or wetbacks or something when he did it, adding an ethnic intimidation element to his crime that he committed while brandishing a firearm.

That's kidnapping.


Technically you could be mostly correct. But it doesn't pass common sense much.

Guy acted out of anger perhaps? If he had a gun?

No harm no foul on his part perhaps?
 
Technically you could be mostly correct. But it doesn't pass common sense much.

Guy acted out of anger perhaps? If he had a gun?

No harm no foul on his part perhaps?
Apparently he had just left the bar, so alcohol could be a factor in his aggressive behavior.
 
Back
Top Bottom