- Thread starter
- #281
It does if you read it, but the lowbrow left don't generally read. They just do what they're told by the Borg masters.That's a bullshit article that doesn't say anything specific.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It does if you read it, but the lowbrow left don't generally read. They just do what they're told by the Borg masters.That's a bullshit article that doesn't say anything specific.
I read it. It doesn't say what they derived their conclusions from. Algorithms, I don't think so!It does if you read it, but the lowbrow left don't generally read. They just do what they're told by the Borg masters.
"Great, either quote me saying, 'election fraud,' or you're once again proven to be full of shit...."Great, either quote me saying, "election fraud," or you're once again proven to be full of shit....
Ready?
Go!
Well, we had a presidential stolen.
"Great, either quote me saying, 'election fraud,' or you're once again proven to be full of shit...."
Done
I wasn't addressing the media.Context means nothing to the media. It gets in the way of their biggest lies all the time. It is roundly ignored.
Done where? In my challenge to you to where I ever said that about the 2016 election? You do realize that's an admission that you're full of shit, right?
Why Shouldn't We Have A Myanmar Styled Coup In The US??
If the voting fraud is conclusively proven then strong measures need to be taken to redress and assure future elections are above suspicion. The military should be called upon only if fraud is proven and the perpetrators seek to maintain the fraud. . Why do you hate our democracy? If fraud...www.usmessageboard.com
Here you accuse Republicans of being "cheaters."
You asked for a quote. I gave you one. Apologize!Which I backed up, posting this list...
I don't care who you were addressing.I wasn't addressing the media.
You asked for a quote. I gave you one. Apologize!
That would be "what"I don't care who you were addressing.
Why would I know if I don't care?That would be "what"
You accused Republicans of cheating during the 2016 elections. Now you're backtracking. Just admit it, you believed Republicans cheated in the 2016 elections. Try one time to be honest. You may learn to like it.I challenged you to me where I said Hillary lost due to election fraud. You failed to do that. Showing where I said Republicans are the bigger cheaters is not claiming Hillary lost due to election fraud. In fact, I've said Trump won that election fairly.
You're just full of shit.
That's not why you don't know.Why would I know if I don't care?
Now you are a mind reader? Wouldn't it be easier to admit you say very little of any value because you basically only perpetuate lies.That's not why you don't know.
The reason is that you're a moron.Now you are a mind reader? Wouldn't it be easier to admit you say very little of any value because you basically only perpetuate lies.
Not arguing that you know what a moron is due to your vast personal experience. Anything else?The reason is that you're a moron.
You accused Republicans of cheating during the 2016 elections. Now you're backtracking. Just admit it, you believed Republicans cheated in the 2016 elections. Try one time to be honest. You may learn to like it.
Poor Fruitcake, I accepted Hillary lost a free & fair election. Sucks to be a nutcase like you.
They cheat in every election, including the 2016 one? Just apologize and get it over with.Moron, I said Republicans cheat in every election. I didn't say they stole the 2016 election from Hillary. Here I am saying Trump won that election "fair & fair"...