London terrorists, Palestinian terrorists, what's the difference? Nothing

[P F Tinmore]

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/04/world/europe/uk-london-attacks.html?_r=0

In a matter of minutes, the three assailants were chased down by eight armed officers who fired about 50 rounds, killing the men, who wore what appeared to be suicide vests but subsequently proved to be fake. One member of the public also sustained nonfatal gunshot wounds, the police said.



Sounds like a well coordinated response by police to the Islamic terrorist attack. 50 rounds from 5.56 NATO rifles divided by three Islamic terrorists will get the job done nicely.

It is a function of law enforcement to bring down the criminals.

Broad brushing large groups of people will only hinder that process. We need to focus on the criminal element.

Large groups of people (Islamic people) are providing safe havens in segregated islamo-enclaves for Islamic terrorists.

That doesn't change my post any.

 

[P F Tinmore]

And honestly, this thread has nothing to do with I/P. It is another thread designed to brand all Muslims as terrorists and hide the fact that the real terrorists do not wear head scarves, but yarmulkes.

Bottom line.

No. The purpose of this thread is to illuminate the idea that Islamic terrorism is not a RESPONSE to ... well, anything.

Muslim terrorists are not attacking the people of London, or Manchester or Paris or Berlin or Nice or Brussels in response to anything the people of London or Manchester or Paris or Berlin or Nice or Brussels have done to Muslims or to Islam or to any national interests. This part is easy. We all know and understand this, yes?

The corollary is we must consider that the Israeli Arab conflict is also not fundamentally driven by a RESPONSE to Jews being present in Israel/Palestine/Gaza but as part of a larger, global movement.

No. The purpose of this thread is to illuminate the idea that Islamic terrorism is not a RESPONSE to ... well, anything.

The Palestinian resistance is obviously against Zionist colonialism.

Now the other attacks I don't know. I haven't heard any reports on that.

Terrorism by Arab-Moslem squatters masquerading as "Pal'istanians" is offensive gee-had.

You should read the Hamas charter.

I have. What is your point?

 

[Hollie]

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/04/world/europe/uk-london-attacks.html?_r=0

In a matter of minutes, the three assailants were chased down by eight armed officers who fired about 50 rounds, killing the men, who wore what appeared to be suicide vests but subsequently proved to be fake. One member of the public also sustained nonfatal gunshot wounds, the police said.



Sounds like a well coordinated response by police to the Islamic terrorist attack. 50 rounds from 5.56 NATO rifles divided by three Islamic terrorists will get the job done nicely.

It is a function of law enforcement to bring down the criminals.

Broad brushing large groups of people will only hinder that process. We need to focus on the criminal element.

Large groups of people (Islamic people) are providing safe havens in segregated islamo-enclaves for Islamic terrorists.

That doesn't change my post any.

You apologetics for Islamic terrorism ignores many harsh realities.

 

[Hollie]

And honestly, this thread has nothing to do with I/P. It is another thread designed to brand all Muslims as terrorists and hide the fact that the real terrorists do not wear head scarves, but yarmulkes.

Bottom line.

No. The purpose of this thread is to illuminate the idea that Islamic terrorism is not a RESPONSE to ... well, anything.

Muslim terrorists are not attacking the people of London, or Manchester or Paris or Berlin or Nice or Brussels in response to anything the people of London or Manchester or Paris or Berlin or Nice or Brussels have done to Muslims or to Islam or to any national interests. This part is easy. We all know and understand this, yes?

The corollary is we must consider that the Israeli Arab conflict is also not fundamentally driven by a RESPONSE to Jews being present in Israel/Palestine/Gaza but as part of a larger, global movement.

No. The purpose of this thread is to illuminate the idea that Islamic terrorism is not a RESPONSE to ... well, anything.

The Palestinian resistance is obviously against Zionist colonialism.

Now the other attacks I don't know. I haven't heard any reports on that.

Terrorism by Arab-Moslem squatters masquerading as "Pal'istanians" is offensive gee-had.

You should read the Hamas charter.

I have. What is your point?

You don't understand. That's the point you're missing.

 

[P F Tinmore]

And honestly, this thread has nothing to do with I/P. It is another thread designed to brand all Muslims as terrorists and hide the fact that the real terrorists do not wear head scarves, but yarmulkes.

Bottom line.

No. The purpose of this thread is to illuminate the idea that Islamic terrorism is not a RESPONSE to ... well, anything.

Muslim terrorists are not attacking the people of London, or Manchester or Paris or Berlin or Nice or Brussels in response to anything the people of London or Manchester or Paris or Berlin or Nice or Brussels have done to Muslims or to Islam or to any national interests. This part is easy. We all know and understand this, yes?

The corollary is we must consider that the Israeli Arab conflict is also not fundamentally driven by a RESPONSE to Jews being present in Israel/Palestine/Gaza but as part of a larger, global movement.

No. The purpose of this thread is to illuminate the idea that Islamic terrorism is not a RESPONSE to ... well, anything.

The Palestinian resistance is obviously against Zionist colonialism.

Now the other attacks I don't know. I haven't heard any reports on that.

Terrorism by Arab-Moslem squatters masquerading as "Pal'istanians" is offensive gee-had.

You should read the Hamas charter.

I have. What is your point?

You don't understand. That's the point you're missing.

Perhaps it is you who does not understand.

BTW, the new charter matches their activities on the ground better than the old charter.

 

[Hollie]

No. The purpose of this thread is to illuminate the idea that Islamic terrorism is not a RESPONSE to ... well, anything.

Muslim terrorists are not attacking the people of London, or Manchester or Paris or Berlin or Nice or Brussels in response to anything the people of London or Manchester or Paris or Berlin or Nice or Brussels have done to Muslims or to Islam or to any national interests. This part is easy. We all know and understand this, yes?

The corollary is we must consider that the Israeli Arab conflict is also not fundamentally driven by a RESPONSE to Jews being present in Israel/Palestine/Gaza but as part of a larger, global movement.

No. The purpose of this thread is to illuminate the idea that Islamic terrorism is not a RESPONSE to ... well, anything.

The Palestinian resistance is obviously against Zionist colonialism.

Now the other attacks I don't know. I haven't heard any reports on that.

Terrorism by Arab-Moslem squatters masquerading as "Pal'istanians" is offensive gee-had.

You should read the Hamas charter.

I have. What is your point?

You don't understand. That's the point you're missing.

Perhaps it is you who does not understand.

BTW, the new charter matches their activities on the ground better than the old charter.

Perhaps I can be honest about Islamic terrorism and where it derives while you will not.

The new charter is the old charter. Islamic terrorism knows no geographic borders or passage of time.


London Bridge attack: 11 detained after raids, attackers to be named

London Bridge attack: 11 detained, attackers to be named - CNN.com

As we see with regularity during the investigations after Islamic terrorists attacks, there are networks of Islamic terrorist supporters and enablers.

Tacit support even comes from the willingness of those in the Islamist no-go zones to remain silent about what goes on around them.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Palestinian resistance is obviously against Zionist colonialism.

Now the other attacks I don't know. I haven't heard any reports on that.

Terrorism by Arab-Moslem squatters masquerading as "Pal'istanians" is offensive gee-had.

You should read the Hamas charter.

I have. What is your point?

You don't understand. That's the point you're missing.

Perhaps it is you who does not understand.

BTW, the new charter matches their activities on the ground better than the old charter.

Perhaps I can be honest about Islamic terrorism and where it derives while you will not.

The new charter is the old charter. Islamic terrorism knows no geographic borders or passage of time.


London Bridge attack: 11 detained after raids, attackers to be named

London Bridge attack: 11 detained, attackers to be named - CNN.com

As we see with regularity during the investigations after Islamic terrorists attacks, there are networks of Islamic terrorist supporters and enablers.

Tacit support even comes from the willingness of those in the Islamist no-go zones to remain silent about what goes on around them.

Perhaps I can be honest about Islamic terrorism and where it derives while you will not.

I try to distinguish between real terrorism and that political name calling crap.

 

[Hollie]

Terrorism by Arab-Moslem squatters masquerading as "Pal'istanians" is offensive gee-had.

You should read the Hamas charter.

I have. What is your point?

You don't understand. That's the point you're missing.

Perhaps it is you who does not understand.

BTW, the new charter matches their activities on the ground better than the old charter.

Perhaps I can be honest about Islamic terrorism and where it derives while you will not.

The new charter is the old charter. Islamic terrorism knows no geographic borders or passage of time.


London Bridge attack: 11 detained after raids, attackers to be named

London Bridge attack: 11 detained, attackers to be named - CNN.com

As we see with regularity during the investigations after Islamic terrorists attacks, there are networks of Islamic terrorist supporters and enablers.

Tacit support even comes from the willingness of those in the Islamist no-go zones to remain silent about what goes on around them.

Perhaps I can be honest about Islamic terrorism and where it derives while you will not.

I try to distinguish between real terrorism and that political name calling crap.

Dead kuffar (that's as real as it gets), is reality of Islamic terrorism. I can't accept your excuses, as much as you want to sidestep it.

 

[Roudy]

And honestly, this thread has nothing to do with I/P. It is another thread designed to brand all Muslims as terrorists and hide the fact that the real terrorists do not wear head scarves, but yarmulkes.

Bottom line.

No. The purpose of this thread is to illuminate the idea that Islamic terrorism is not a RESPONSE to ... well, anything.

Muslim terrorists are not attacking the people of London, or Manchester or Paris or Berlin or Nice or Brussels in response to anything the people of London or Manchester or Paris or Berlin or Nice or Brussels have done to Muslims or to Islam or to any national interests. This part is easy. We all know and understand this, yes?

The corollary is we must consider that the Israeli Arab conflict is also not fundamentally driven by a RESPONSE to Jews being present in Israel/Palestine/Gaza but as part of a larger, global movement.

No. The purpose of this thread is to illuminate the idea that Islamic terrorism is not a RESPONSE to ... well, anything.

The Palestinian resistance is obviously against Zionist colonialism.

Now the other attacks I don't know. I haven't heard any reports on that.

You don't know that Palestinian animals have conducted identical types of attacks as the one we witnessed in using cars and random stabbings on totally innocent people? Now to an IslamoNazi loving terrorist ass kisser that might be considered "resistance", to the rest of the world it's Barbaric Islamic terrorism.

 

[fanger]

It would appear that no Israeli's or palestinians were involved so why is this in I/P forum?

 

[Roudy]

Terrorism by Arab-Moslem squatters masquerading as "Pal'istanians" is offensive gee-had.

You should read the Hamas charter.

I have. What is your point?

You don't understand. That's the point you're missing.

Perhaps it is you who does not understand.

BTW, the new charter matches their activities on the ground better than the old charter.

Perhaps I can be honest about Islamic terrorism and where it derives while you will not.

The new charter is the old charter. Islamic terrorism knows no geographic borders or passage of time.


London Bridge attack: 11 detained after raids, attackers to be named

London Bridge attack: 11 detained, attackers to be named - CNN.com

As we see with regularity during the investigations after Islamic terrorists attacks, there are networks of Islamic terrorist supporters and enablers.

Tacit support even comes from the willingness of those in the Islamist no-go zones to remain silent about what goes on around them.

Perhaps I can be honest about Islamic terrorism and where it derives while you will not.

I try to distinguish between real terrorism and that political name calling crap.

Why should a Palestinian animal who mows down innocent people with a car not be called a terrorist, you friggin moron? Because you have friends that are Palestinian? What an idiot.

 

[Roudy]

It would appear that no Israeli's or palestinians were involved so why is this in I/P forum?

Because the attacks in London are exactly the same type of attacks Palestinians conduct on Israelis. Duhhhhh.

 

[fanger]

I have. What is your point?

You don't understand. That's the point you're missing.

Perhaps it is you who does not understand.

BTW, the new charter matches their activities on the ground better than the old charter.

Perhaps I can be honest about Islamic terrorism and where it derives while you will not.

The new charter is the old charter. Islamic terrorism knows no geographic borders or passage of time.


London Bridge attack: 11 detained after raids, attackers to be named

London Bridge attack: 11 detained, attackers to be named - CNN.com

As we see with regularity during the investigations after Islamic terrorists attacks, there are networks of Islamic terrorist supporters and enablers.

Tacit support even comes from the willingness of those in the Islamist no-go zones to remain silent about what goes on around them.

Perhaps I can be honest about Islamic terrorism and where it derives while you will not.

I try to distinguish between real terrorism and that political name calling crap.

Why should a Palestinian animal who mows down innocent people with a car not be called a terrorist, you friggin moron? Because you have friends that are Palestinian? What an idiot.

Why should a jewish settler animal who mows down innocent people with a car not be called a terrorist, you friggin moron?

 

[MJB12741]

You don't understand. That's the point you're missing.

Perhaps it is you who does not understand.

BTW, the new charter matches their activities on the ground better than the old charter.

Perhaps I can be honest about Islamic terrorism and where it derives while you will not.

The new charter is the old charter. Islamic terrorism knows no geographic borders or passage of time.


London Bridge attack: 11 detained after raids, attackers to be named

London Bridge attack: 11 detained, attackers to be named - CNN.com

As we see with regularity during the investigations after Islamic terrorists attacks, there are networks of Islamic terrorist supporters and enablers.

Tacit support even comes from the willingness of those in the Islamist no-go zones to remain silent about what goes on around them.

Perhaps I can be honest about Islamic terrorism and where it derives while you will not.

I try to distinguish between real terrorism and that political name calling crap.

Why should a Palestinian animal who mows down innocent people with a car not be called a terrorist, you friggin moron? Because you have friends that are Palestinian? What an idiot.

Why should a jewish settler animal who mows down innocent people with a car not be called a terrorist, you friggin moron?

So tell us why those idiots were attacking the people in the car?

 

[Roudy]

You don't understand. That's the point you're missing.

Perhaps it is you who does not understand.

BTW, the new charter matches their activities on the ground better than the old charter.

Perhaps I can be honest about Islamic terrorism and where it derives while you will not.

The new charter is the old charter. Islamic terrorism knows no geographic borders or passage of time.


London Bridge attack: 11 detained after raids, attackers to be named

London Bridge attack: 11 detained, attackers to be named - CNN.com

As we see with regularity during the investigations after Islamic terrorists attacks, there are networks of Islamic terrorist supporters and enablers.

Tacit support even comes from the willingness of those in the Islamist no-go zones to remain silent about what goes on around them.

Perhaps I can be honest about Islamic terrorism and where it derives while you will not.

I try to distinguish between real terrorism and that political name calling crap.

Why should a Palestinian animal who mows down innocent people with a car not be called a terrorist, you friggin moron? Because you have friends that are Palestinian? What an idiot.

Why should a jewish settler animal who mows down innocent people with a car not be called a terrorist, you friggin moron?

Here in the US of A, throwing rocks or objects at moving vehicles is considered assault with a deadly weapon. Equivalent of shooting someone with a gun or a stabbing. As we can see the Palestinian animals are throwing rocks at the driver of the vehicle. You should be asking what kind of depraved culture is it that it's parents allow kids to throw rocks at moving vehicles while standing in the path of the vehicle!

 

[Hollie]

You don't understand. That's the point you're missing.

Perhaps it is you who does not understand.

BTW, the new charter matches their activities on the ground better than the old charter.

Perhaps I can be honest about Islamic terrorism and where it derives while you will not.

The new charter is the old charter. Islamic terrorism knows no geographic borders or passage of time.


London Bridge attack: 11 detained after raids, attackers to be named

London Bridge attack: 11 detained, attackers to be named - CNN.com

As we see with regularity during the investigations after Islamic terrorists attacks, there are networks of Islamic terrorist supporters and enablers.

Tacit support even comes from the willingness of those in the Islamist no-go zones to remain silent about what goes on around them.

Perhaps I can be honest about Islamic terrorism and where it derives while you will not.

I try to distinguish between real terrorism and that political name calling crap.

Why should a Palestinian animal who mows down innocent people with a car not be called a terrorist, you friggin moron? Because you have friends that are Palestinian? What an idiot.

Why should a jewish settler animal who mows down innocent people with a car not be called a terrorist, you friggin moron?

It is a recognizable pattern of behaviour for you Islamic terrorist huggers to plagiarize the comments of others.

 

[Roudy]

Perhaps it is you who does not understand.

BTW, the new charter matches their activities on the ground better than the old charter.

Perhaps I can be honest about Islamic terrorism and where it derives while you will not.

The new charter is the old charter. Islamic terrorism knows no geographic borders or passage of time.


London Bridge attack: 11 detained after raids, attackers to be named

London Bridge attack: 11 detained, attackers to be named - CNN.com

As we see with regularity during the investigations after Islamic terrorists attacks, there are networks of Islamic terrorist supporters and enablers.

Tacit support even comes from the willingness of those in the Islamist no-go zones to remain silent about what goes on around them.

Perhaps I can be honest about Islamic terrorism and where it derives while you will not.

I try to distinguish between real terrorism and that political name calling crap.

Why should a Palestinian animal who mows down innocent people with a car not be called a terrorist, you friggin moron? Because you have friends that are Palestinian? What an idiot.

Why should a jewish settler animal who mows down innocent people with a car not be called a terrorist, you friggin moron?

It is a recognizable pattern of behaviour for you Islamic terrorist huggers to plagiarize the comments of others.

It's a common reaction they exhibit, when confronted with the truth. Maybe the Israelis will invent a medication to cure this allergy they have.

 

[montelatici]

Comparing native people resisting colonization and military occupation to terrorist attacks in western europe demonstrates how absurd the Zionists have become. Israel is a colonial settler colony, it is not a western democracy, it is a theocratic state, not different than Muslim theocracies.

 

[Humanity]

Both engage in driving over innocent people and random stabbing attacks in the name of Allah. There is absolutely no difference between the Islamic animals in London, and the Islamic Palestinian animals. Except for geography.

Oh how the uneducated blather such nonsense...

I blame the American terrorists for staring this whole ISIS 'war... Had those American terrorists not lied and cheated their way in the 90's to starting a war in Iraq then there would not be these issues...

Oh and the American terrorists who leave behind, conveniently, military hardware, with keys in and ammunition, for those bad boys to pick up and continue their terror...

Shame on every American. The blood is on YOUR hands!

What I gathered from that nonsensical gibberish is that you were trying to blame the victims of Islamic terrorism, instead of the perpetrators, and the ideology that fuels it.

If that's what you "gathered" from my post then you can't be very bright Roudy...

 

[P F Tinmore]

It would appear that no Israeli's or palestinians were involved so why is this in I/P forum?

They are trying to equate Palestinian resistance to Islamic terrorism.