Logical next step?

[Marener]

Biden hasnt been indicted at all. You cant indict a sitting president, retard.

We are talking about Trump having the AG drop all charges pending against him.

 

[Godboy]

We are talking about Trump having the AG drop all charges pending against him.

No the fuck we arent. You need to keep up with the conversation, retard.

 

[OKTexas]

Not really. It's just that conservative justices say that the law doesn't actually matter anymore if they don't like what the president does.

That's why they invented the "major questions" doctrine, to give themselves veto power that doesn't exist in the constitution.

I think you need to read article 3 again.

.

 

[Marener]

I think you need to read article 3 again.

.

Nowhere does it mention anything about the major questions doctrine. Article 3 does not permit the court to grab vast amounts of power as this court has done.

 

[Marener]

No the fuck we arent. You need to keep up with the conversation, retard.

You have a very illogical interpretation of what the poster was referring to.

 

[OKTexas]

Keep telling yourself that.

I've said it before. You guys like defending risking infertility in mothers because some abortion laws say they have to carry unviable fetuses to term?

Congratulations, now you can add defending, "the president should be above the law" to your list.

This will play well in November especially among independents and Democrats. You just ensured that most of them, I suspect, will feel they have to turn out to prevent Trump from taking office. Any lack of enthusiasm for Biden is now gone. If for no other reason, that most KNOW what Trump will do with this newfound immunity.

And you'd better hope Democrats won't actually do what you've been claiming they're doing, since SCOTUS just added an entire slew of corrupt actions as legal.

So you're just a fucking liar, GOT IT!

.

 

[Godboy]

Nowhere does it mention anything about the major questions doctrine. Article 3 does not permit the court to grab vast amounts of power as this court has done.

Stop saying weird shit. Cant you be a normal person for 1 fucking day?

 

[Godboy]

You have a very illogical interpretation of what the poster was referring to.

Youre a fucking retard, so of course you think that.

 

[OKTexas]

Nowhere does it mention anything about the major questions doctrine. Article 3 does not permit the court to grab vast amounts of power as this court has done.

Really, of course you can expand on that, what power has the court grabbed? Be specific.

.

 

[forkup]

So you're just a fucking liar, GOT IT!

.

What did I lie about?

 

[Meathead]

Why do you never complain about the violent white citizen committing murders?

Which one?

 

[Marener]

Stop saying weird shit. Cant you be a normal person for 1 fucking day?

Sorry, but you’re just not very smart and you say a lot of shit without having any idea what you’re talking about.

 

[Marener]

Really, of course you can expand on that, what power has the court grabbed? Be specific.

.

I already stated. They gave themselves veto power over any policy of the executive they don’t like. The law doesn’t matter. They can just pretend the law doesnt mean what it says.

 

[Dragonlady]

How do you think they create the acceptable racial representation districts in States where it's mandated? They Gerrymander.

They have the ability to hear from both sides experts and decide. That's the whole point of being a judge. Under Chevron only the regulators experts counted when the wording was vague.

Taking a bribe has always been illegal, so the President wouldn't get a pass on that.

No they don't. They simply use geographic lines. Gerrymandering is specifically placing certain voters in the district. You draw straight lines around an area, or use county and city limits, and that's the district.

You don't take the "urban voters" from one area and split them into 3 and add them to three different Conservatives districts to dilute the "urban" vote and prevent this group from having ANY representation.

This is how you get super majorities of white Republicans in states that have close to a 50% minority population. Alabama has a white population of less than 45%, and yet the members of the state legislature are 75% white and 85% male. Hardly "representative" of the population.

And this is why red states are such a complete disaster in terms of education and infrastructure.

 

[Dragonlady]

Stop saying weird shit. Cant you be a normal person for 1 fucking day?

How ironic. YOU complaining about other people saying "weird shit". You're posts are nothing but "weird shit", and you mocking and laughing about it.

Now that your SC is busy destroying the Constitution, you're having a panic attack at left wing speculation as to what it all means.

Grow the fuck up and stop behaving like a spoilt toddler.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

How ironic. YOU complaining about other people saying "weird shit". You're posts are nothing but "weird shit", and you mocking and laughing about it.

Now that your SC is busy destroying the Constitution, you're having a panic attack at left wing speculation as to what it all means.

Grow the fuck up and stop behaving like a spoilt toddler.

You seem very angry....good.

 

[martybegan]

No they don't. They simply use geographic lines. Gerrymandering is specifically placing certain voters in the district. You draw straight lines around an area, or use county and city limits, and that's the district.

You don't take the "urban voters" from one area and split them into 3 and add them to three different Conservatives districts to dilute the "urban" vote and prevent this group from having ANY representation.

This is how you get super majorities of white Republicans in states that have close to a 50% minority population. Alabama has a white population of less than 45%, and yet the members of the state legislature are 75% white and 85% male. Hardly "representative" of the population.

And this is why red states are such a complete disaster in terms of education and infrastructure.

When you create "black majority" districts, you don't use geographical lines, you use where the black people live.

And I have a feeling Dems will care about this less and less as Blacks start leaving the Dems because of the hard lefty shit and the empty promises of over half a century.

Education in NYC, Chicago and LA is great throughout the city?

Infrastructure in those cities aren't falling apart in some cases?

 

[OKTexas]

Because the President cannot be prosecuted for conduct within his exclusive constitutional authority, Trump is absolutely immune from prosecution for the
alleged conduct involving his discussions with Justice Department of
-
ficials. Pp. 19–21

Yep, and there are precedents cited for that reasoning. All federal law enforcement authority is derived from the president, I've probably said that a hundred times on the forum over the years. The president can establish priorities for the DOJ and if the AG disagrees or refuses to follow the president, the president has every right to fire his/her ass. This is nothing new.

.

 

[Dragonlady]

When you create "black majority" districts, you don't use geographical lines, you use where the black people live.

And I have a feeling Dems will care about this less and less as Blacks start leaving the Dems because of the hard lefty shit and the empty promises of over half a century.

Education in NYC, Chicago and LA is great throughout the city?

Infrastructure in those cities aren't falling apart in some cases?

Creating districts is about creating a representative democracy, not "black districts" That's why you use geographic lines and city limits.

Until Republican Party disavows racism and white supremacy, black people won't be joining the Republican Party, because they will never be given any real power within a white nationalist party.

Education and infrastructure are not part of local government. Education is the purview of the State, and instrastructure is split between local, state and federal. When local governments have their state and federal funding cut because the Republican state government refuses to fund urban areas controlled by minorities, both infrastructure and education suffer.

See Flint Michigan's water crisis - declare black city government "corrupt". Take over their water supply. Refuse to fund local water treatement.

Jackson Mississippi - declare black government "corrupt". Refuse to fund local water treatement.

Wash rinse and repeat for every black controlled city in a red super majority state. Then point to the decline in the quality of life in these cities which results from underfunding city needs, as the "result" of Democrats' control.

 

[martybegan]

Creating districts is about creating a representative democracy, not "black districts" That's why you use geographic lines and city limits.

Until Republican Party disavows racism and white supremacy, black people won't be joining the Republican Party, because they will never be given any real power within a white nationalist party.

The whole point of Civil Rights lawsuits in some States is to setup black majority districts.

And again with the "anyone to the right of Mitt Romney is a racist white nationalist nazi. "