Liberal Surrogate Propaganda Pushers Silent About Brazile's 'Bombshell'

[easyt65]

"The broadcast evening newscasts on three major networks on Thursday didn't mention bombshell revelations by former Democratic National Committee interim Chairwoman Donna Brazile.

Brazile has written in a new book that she discovered evidence that she said showed Hillary Diane Rodham ClintonBlumenthal: Trump-tied data firm reaching out to WikiLeaks ‘significant’Tillerson eliminates key State Department sanctions office: reportIntel Dem: What’s in dossier more important than who paid for itMORE’s campaign "rigged" the Democratic presidential primary.

"ABC's World News Tonight," "NBC Nightly News" and "CBS Evening News" all didn't report the allegations by Brazile on Thursday evening despite it receiving considerable coverage on cable news and in print and online media. Brazile was also trending as one of Twitter's top topics on Thursday."





http://thehill.com/homenews/media/358589-network-newscasts-dont-mention-brazile-clinton-dnc-revelations

 

[Grumblenuts]

What a boring topic, but imagining this connects with anything "Liberal" certainly shows volumes about you.

 

[S.J.]

MSM viewers have to be the most uninformed people in the world. Not only uninformed but misled as well. Homeless people know more about current events than they do.

 

[easyt65]

What a boring topic....

The liberal media is once again BUSTED, exposed as nothing more than a Liberal / DNC 'sock puppet' / 'mouthpiece' ... and of course snowflakes claim....




Bwuhahahaha......

 

[Grumblenuts]

Ah, that explains it. So not only the MSM, now you think the DNC itself is liberal. How's it feel being such a willing tool?

 

[easyt65]

Ah, that explains it. So not only the MSM, now you think the DNC itself is liberal.

Gee, let's analyze that for a minute.....

Hillary is a Liberal.

The DNC was run by a Liberal, one who ran her own Pakistani spy ring and gave her spies access to classified House files as well as to DNC e-mails with their usernames and passwords.
-- The DNC is now run by an idiot Liberal who does not know the Electoral College system is covered under the constitution and has no idea the DNC spent millions on a fake report filled with Russian propaganda bought from a foreign agent through a company with a history of working with / for Russians, and that the report was used illegally in a US election.

The DNC was left million in the RED by Barry, allowing Hillary to step in and 'buy' the DNC and then - as Brazile stated - engage in Money Laundering by taking / spending donations intended for use on other candidates on her own losing campaign.

That is barely scratching the surface of 'all things DNC' ... and that is as far as one needs to go to address your idiotic post....

 

[easyt65]

If you ewant to address the Liberal surrogates themselves, we can discuss MSNBC's use of a white supremacist web site as 'legit
news to attack Trump...or we can talk about CNN who has had to retract numerous stories and fire reporters for being repeatedly busted pushing lies / fake stories.... or we can talk about how all of them have refused to report on some of the biggest news stories in decades because they reflect negatively on the DNC / Democrats / Hillary...

 

[BULLDOG]

MSM viewers have to be the most uninformed people in the world. Not only uninformed but misled as well. Homeless people know more about current events than they do.

No, Actually Fox viewers are the most uninformed people in the world. They know less about what is going on than people who watch NO news.


A Rigorous Scientific Look Into The 'Fox News Effect'
In 2012, a Fairleigh Dickinson University survey reported that Fox News viewers were less informed about current events than people who didn't follow the news at all. The survey had asked current events questions like "Which party has the most seats in the House of Representatives?" and also asked what source of news people followed. The Fox viewers' current events scores were in the basement. This finding was immediately trumpeted by the liberal media—by Fox, not so much—and has since become known as the Fox News effect. It conjures the image of Fox News as a black hole that sucks facts out of viewers' heads.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

MSM viewers have to be the most uninformed people in the world. Not only uninformed but misled as well. Homeless people know more about current events than they do.

No, Actually Fox viewers are the most uninformed people in the world. They know less about what is going on than people who watch NO news.


A Rigorous Scientific Look Into The 'Fox News Effect'
In 2012, a Fairleigh Dickinson University survey reported that Fox News viewers were less informed about current events than people who didn't follow the news at all. The survey had asked current events questions like "Which party has the most seats in the House of Representatives?" and also asked what source of news people followed. The Fox viewers' current events scores were in the basement. This finding was immediately trumpeted by the liberal media—by Fox, not so much—and has since become known as the Fox News effect. It conjures the image of Fox News as a black hole that sucks facts out of viewers' heads.

And what is your comment about the Brazile's accusation?

 

[BULLDOG]

MSM viewers have to be the most uninformed people in the world. Not only uninformed but misled as well. Homeless people know more about current events than they do.

No, Actually Fox viewers are the most uninformed people in the world. They know less about what is going on than people who watch NO news.


A Rigorous Scientific Look Into The 'Fox News Effect'
In 2012, a Fairleigh Dickinson University survey reported that Fox News viewers were less informed about current events than people who didn't follow the news at all. The survey had asked current events questions like "Which party has the most seats in the House of Representatives?" and also asked what source of news people followed. The Fox viewers' current events scores were in the basement. This finding was immediately trumpeted by the liberal media—by Fox, not so much—and has since become known as the Fox News effect. It conjures the image of Fox News as a black hole that sucks facts out of viewers' heads.

And what is your comment about the Brazile's accusation?

More of a statement, don't you think? I believe it will set RWNJs hair on fire as they run in circles and make up a lot of shit they want to claim it said, instead of what was actually said

 

[iamwhatiseem]

MSM viewers have to be the most uninformed people in the world. Not only uninformed but misled as well. Homeless people know more about current events than they do.

No, Actually Fox viewers are the most uninformed people in the world. They know less about what is going on than people who watch NO news.


A Rigorous Scientific Look Into The 'Fox News Effect'
In 2012, a Fairleigh Dickinson University survey reported that Fox News viewers were less informed about current events than people who didn't follow the news at all. The survey had asked current events questions like "Which party has the most seats in the House of Representatives?" and also asked what source of news people followed. The Fox viewers' current events scores were in the basement. This finding was immediately trumpeted by the liberal media—by Fox, not so much—and has since become known as the Fox News effect. It conjures the image of Fox News as a black hole that sucks facts out of viewers' heads.

And what is your comment about the Brazile's accusation?

More of a statement, don't you think? I believe it will set RWNJs hair on fire as they run in circles and make up a lot of shit they want to claim it said, instead of what was actually said

And that is fine if you also believe that the left is doing the exact same thing to Trump?
You have a room full of lawyers and investigators, virtually all of them supported Hillary's campaign even financially...spending $millions and going all out to try and show Trump colluded to effect the election - when you have a DNC Chairwoman and now a D Senator also saying she rigged the primaries... no irony there?

 

[S.J.]

MSM viewers have to be the most uninformed people in the world. Not only uninformed but misled as well. Homeless people know more about current events than they do.

No, Actually Fox viewers are the most uninformed people in the world. They know less about what is going on than people who watch NO news.


A Rigorous Scientific Look Into The 'Fox News Effect'
In 2012, a Fairleigh Dickinson University survey reported that Fox News viewers were less informed about current events than people who didn't follow the news at all. The survey had asked current events questions like "Which party has the most seats in the House of Representatives?" and also asked what source of news people followed. The Fox viewers' current events scores were in the basement. This finding was immediately trumpeted by the liberal media—by Fox, not so much—and has since become known as the Fox News effect. It conjures the image of Fox News as a black hole that sucks facts out of viewers' heads.

Fairleigh Dickinson University? Well, I'm certainly convinced.

How many ABC, NBC, and CBS viewers do you suppose know about Donna Brazile's outing of Hillary rigging the primary to screw Bernie out of the nomination?

 

[S.J.]

MSM viewers have to be the most uninformed people in the world. Not only uninformed but misled as well. Homeless people know more about current events than they do.

No, Actually Fox viewers are the most uninformed people in the world. They know less about what is going on than people who watch NO news.


A Rigorous Scientific Look Into The 'Fox News Effect'
In 2012, a Fairleigh Dickinson University survey reported that Fox News viewers were less informed about current events than people who didn't follow the news at all. The survey had asked current events questions like "Which party has the most seats in the House of Representatives?" and also asked what source of news people followed. The Fox viewers' current events scores were in the basement. This finding was immediately trumpeted by the liberal media—by Fox, not so much—and has since become known as the Fox News effect. It conjures the image of Fox News as a black hole that sucks facts out of viewers' heads.

And what is your comment about the Brazile's accusation?

More of a statement, don't you think? I believe it will set RWNJs hair on fire as they run in circles and make up a lot of shit they want to claim it said, instead of what was actually said

So tell us what was actually said if she didn't say Hillary rigged the primaries to secure the nomination for herself.

 

[BULLDOG]

MSM viewers have to be the most uninformed people in the world. Not only uninformed but misled as well. Homeless people know more about current events than they do.

No, Actually Fox viewers are the most uninformed people in the world. They know less about what is going on than people who watch NO news.


A Rigorous Scientific Look Into The 'Fox News Effect'
In 2012, a Fairleigh Dickinson University survey reported that Fox News viewers were less informed about current events than people who didn't follow the news at all. The survey had asked current events questions like "Which party has the most seats in the House of Representatives?" and also asked what source of news people followed. The Fox viewers' current events scores were in the basement. This finding was immediately trumpeted by the liberal media—by Fox, not so much—and has since become known as the Fox News effect. It conjures the image of Fox News as a black hole that sucks facts out of viewers' heads.

And what is your comment about the Brazile's accusation?

More of a statement, don't you think? I believe it will set RWNJs hair on fire as they run in circles and make up a lot of shit they want to claim it said, instead of what was actually said

And that is fine if you also believe that the left is doing the exact same thing to Trump?
You have a room full of lawyers and investigators, virtually all of them supported Hillary's campaign even financially...spending $millions and going all out to try and show Trump colluded to effect the election - when you have a DNC Chairwoman and now a D Senator also saying she rigged the primaries... no irony there?

Are you saying all of those people you mentioned are breaking federal law to support a person who lost an election a year ago, and is not running for anything now? Should be easy for you to prove that, and you could get them all locked up, if it is really happening instead of just more crazy, unfounded RWNJ accusations

 

[BULLDOG]

MSM viewers have to be the most uninformed people in the world. Not only uninformed but misled as well. Homeless people know more about current events than they do.

No, Actually Fox viewers are the most uninformed people in the world. They know less about what is going on than people who watch NO news.


A Rigorous Scientific Look Into The 'Fox News Effect'
In 2012, a Fairleigh Dickinson University survey reported that Fox News viewers were less informed about current events than people who didn't follow the news at all. The survey had asked current events questions like "Which party has the most seats in the House of Representatives?" and also asked what source of news people followed. The Fox viewers' current events scores were in the basement. This finding was immediately trumpeted by the liberal media—by Fox, not so much—and has since become known as the Fox News effect. It conjures the image of Fox News as a black hole that sucks facts out of viewers' heads.

Fairleigh Dickinson University? Well, I'm certainly convinced.

How many ABC, NBC, and CBS viewers do you suppose know about Donna Brazile's outing of Hillary rigging the primary to screw Bernie out of the nomination?

Lots of books I know nothing about. How many fox viewers know about Stephen Miller's testimony?

 

[ClosedCaption]

So everyone covered it but they didnt cover it as much as you want and that means they never reported it. Oh ok...

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Are you saying all of those people you mentioned are breaking federal law to support a person who lost an election a year ago, and is not running for anything now? Should be easy for you to prove that, and you could get them all locked up, if it is really happening instead of just more crazy, unfounded RWNJ accusations

Hahaha....nice twist of words there.
I am asking YOU is there no irony in that the left is going full out, as far as humanly and legally possible to try and find proof that Trump colluded to rig the election, when the left's OWN party chairperson comes right out and states that Hillary knowingly engaged in rigging the primary to win, and then broke election laws to funnel money off of local DNC donations into her own coffer...and a Democrat Senator comes out and also stated she knows that she rigged the Primary....now think about that.
Oh - and how is this "RWNJ conspiracy" when it is the left making the statements and accusations??

That is two questions... I'll wait for your two answers.

 

[BULLDOG]

MSM viewers have to be the most uninformed people in the world. Not only uninformed but misled as well. Homeless people know more about current events than they do.

No, Actually Fox viewers are the most uninformed people in the world. They know less about what is going on than people who watch NO news.


A Rigorous Scientific Look Into The 'Fox News Effect'
In 2012, a Fairleigh Dickinson University survey reported that Fox News viewers were less informed about current events than people who didn't follow the news at all. The survey had asked current events questions like "Which party has the most seats in the House of Representatives?" and also asked what source of news people followed. The Fox viewers' current events scores were in the basement. This finding was immediately trumpeted by the liberal media—by Fox, not so much—and has since become known as the Fox News effect. It conjures the image of Fox News as a black hole that sucks facts out of viewers' heads.

And what is your comment about the Brazile's accusation?

More of a statement, don't you think? I believe it will set RWNJs hair on fire as they run in circles and make up a lot of shit they want to claim it said, instead of what was actually said

So tell us what was actually said if she didn't say Hillary rigged the primaries to secure the nomination for herself.

Haven't read the book, but I'm sure not gonna take the word of a crazy RWNJ

 

[BULLDOG]

Are you saying all of those people you mentioned are breaking federal law to support a person who lost an election a year ago, and is not running for anything now? Should be easy for you to prove that, and you could get them all locked up, if it is really happening instead of just more crazy, unfounded RWNJ accusations

Hahaha....nice twist of words there.
I am asking YOU is there no irony in that the left is going full out, as far as humanly and legally possible to try and find proof that Trump colluded to rig the election, when the left's OWN party chairperson comes right out and states that Hillary knowingly engaged in rigging the primary to win, and then broke election laws to funnel money off of local DNC donations into her own coffer...and a Democrat Senator comes out and also stated she knows that she rigged the Primary....now think about that.
Oh - and how is this "RWNJ conspiracy" when it is the left making the statements and accusations??

That is two questions... I'll wait for your two answers.

The DNC is a private organization and can legally run their primary any way they want. They can legally appoint anyone they want. They legally don't even have to have a primary. Now, point out anything that was done that isn't allowed.

 

[S.J.]

MSM viewers have to be the most uninformed people in the world. Not only uninformed but misled as well. Homeless people know more about current events than they do.

No, Actually Fox viewers are the most uninformed people in the world. They know less about what is going on than people who watch NO news.


A Rigorous Scientific Look Into The 'Fox News Effect'
In 2012, a Fairleigh Dickinson University survey reported that Fox News viewers were less informed about current events than people who didn't follow the news at all. The survey had asked current events questions like "Which party has the most seats in the House of Representatives?" and also asked what source of news people followed. The Fox viewers' current events scores were in the basement. This finding was immediately trumpeted by the liberal media—by Fox, not so much—and has since become known as the Fox News effect. It conjures the image of Fox News as a black hole that sucks facts out of viewers' heads.

And what is your comment about the Brazile's accusation?

More of a statement, don't you think? I believe it will set RWNJs hair on fire as they run in circles and make up a lot of shit they want to claim it said, instead of what was actually said

So tell us what was actually said if she didn't say Hillary rigged the primaries to secure the nomination for herself.

Haven't read the book, but I'm sure not gonna take the word of a crazy RWNJ

Then how do you know she didn't say it? Maybe you'll believe it if it comes from your own cesspool.
Donna Brazile torches Clinton in new book - CNNPolitics