Why not?
It would also put private industry a bit in control of the gun issue.
Not insurable? no gun on public property or others private property.
You could still protect your "castle"
And own all the guns you want, they would just be restricted to your property if no insurance on them.
It would also put private industry a bit in control of the gun issue.
Not insurable? no gun on public property or others private property.
You could still protect your "castle"
And own all the guns you want, they would just be restricted to your property if no insurance on them.
Last edited:
