Let's have a conversation

I’m glad we agree about Kirk. Thanks for the help.
I didn't say I agree about Kirk, I just said "That's Kirk". Meaning, he said "DEI hire", I didn't.

I neither agree nor disagree with the way he worded it. They're not the words I would have used but in a sense, he was right.

But again, my problem with Harris had nothing to do with that in spite of the fact that I thought choosing a VP by those criteria was silly. My position was: wait and see. And boy did we see.
 
1000003789.webp
 
I didn't say I agree about Kirk, I just said "That's Kirk". Meaning, he said "DEI hire", I didn't.

I neither agree nor disagree with the way he worded it. They're not the words I would have used but in a sense, he was right.

But again, my problem with Harris had nothing to do with that in spite of the fact that I thought choosing a VP by those criteria was silly. My position was: wait and see. And boy did we see.
Too late to walk it back now
 
Kirk always welcomed conversation but those who stepped up the the Mic were always intent on debate and playing 'gotcha' with Charlie. They actually served to show our colleges are teaching Marxist ideals. Those who stepped up to the Mic had no intention of conversing they were intent on accusing Kirk of all kinds of fake shit because of their indoctrination into Marxist, Democrat, leftist hatred.
Lies.
 
You're kidding, right? The Department of Education is useless and a waste of federal dollars and always has been. American kids are the most ignorant kids in the world and the rest of the world knows this. Too many don't know basic geography or history.

I'm sorry but the DoE hasn't accomplished a damn thing since its inception. Our rankings have steadily declined throughout the whole of the department's existence.
Not kidding. You seem to believe powerful people are entitled to use their influence to tyrannically disparage and malign institutions of higher education because you believe they are a waste of taxpayer money and/or do not produce results up to your personal standards. The department of education is not an island or an isolated entity from these institutions. These institutions depend on funding via Pell Grants, research grants and other federal funds. You're just proving my point.
I've already given an example: transgenderism. Transgenderism is a thing and that has always been the case.
How many university curriculums teach transgenderism? In what form? How to be one, or perhaps just basic awareness? Do you even know? I don't, because I'm hetero, and not really interested in such a 'liberal ideology' when it affects less than 1% of the population. It certainly doesn't affect me personally, so I don't see the urgency in eradicating it, scorched earth, from society. This is only a hot button issue because of religious norms, especially X-tianity.
But the movement has inflated and conflated the idea beyond all comprehension to the point that people are willing to kill for it.
Through religious donors (influence), the government is currently laser focused on maligning this particular small group of people into hiding through shame and possibly even legislation. It is selective enforcement of the illusion of our 'guaranteed rights'. Malign MAGA/democrats/women/minorities/etc. into hiding in similar fashion, expect said groups to retaliate. It doesn't excuse murder or any other political violence, but ignoring tyranny? One does at their own peril. Critical thinking. Try it.

Should the government dare to try maligning the majority, it should be burnt to the ******* ground in 24 hours. But we've become a 10-ply ultra soft society that puts up with 'soft' tyranny like taxes (see: tariffs) and more and more regulation of our lifestyle. Dare to revolt against them? The gov't will have no quarter in ruining everything about you. The people really running the country are an exclusive club. A club that gives zero ***** about us. And we're not in it.
Colleges and universities are not the only ones responsible of course but they are known to be hotbeds of liberal ideas and it is known that many have incorporated transgender studies in their gender and sociology courses, among others.
As you admitted, It doesn't affect you personally. Why should your opinion be given any consideration or value? :dunno:
What are you talking about? That's the first time I've said anything like that in our exchange.
Yeah. It's a lazy debate tactic used by partisan lightweights. Maybe stop doing it.
Of course it is. But does it make one better than those with no college education? No.
Beyond losers with low IQ/self esteem, no one really leans on the superiority logic.
But some educated think they are. I've seen it on this forum many times. I saw once where an educated person, while conversing with an uneducated person, referred to educated people as "your betters". As in: "You should learn to listen to your betters", or words to that effect.
Yes. They are called elitists. Or as I refer to them, assholes. Get over it. :rolleyes: These morons don't personally affect your life.
But not necessarily true.
Truth is subjective to the teller.
Opinion. You have no idea what my ideologies, traditional norms, and 'activism' are or even that I feel it threatens them.
Try me. I bet I could get pretty damn close.
 
Last edited:
But the couldn't do the research or the reading or the looking up while they were there talking to him, could they?

And he was saying things, and ignoring things, and using certain tactics to push the conversation his way. And he was doing it with university kids because... how many people are that politically savvy and know a lot of stuff at that age?

I saw one video where a girl confronted him with it, and he just said "facts" like "you're a voter and I'm a voter" but completely avoided talking about the facts of what he's actually doing.

When he said "where is the word 'democracy' in the US Constitution?" he missed out the fact that the Supreme Court has said that the US is a kind of democracy, that people have the right to vote.

One fact to obscure another. It's not honest.

And why did he not like democracy? Because that way the right can take over, they can play their games and not listen to the people, but do their "moral" nonsense.
Yeah, I've seen that a few times.

But then again, he's got all those people yelling at him at once.........and most of those kids keep changing the subject.
 
...

I have to acknowledge that his death may have harmed any chance of our country healing itself from this hyperpartisan political atmosphere.

I'm sorry to see the devolution occur.
 
So you do agree with him. You talk from both sides of your mouth.
I said he was right, in a sense. Technically she was not a DEI hire but she might as well have been given those were the criteria Biden used to select her.

As I told candycorn, I really didn't give a shit if she was or not or even that Biden chose her for those reasons. I was willing to give her the benefit of the doubt but after about a year or so it was clear to me this VP wasn't going to accomplish shit, especially about the border which she was placed in charge of.
 

....list of WHAT???

First one is about Republicans not caring about school shootings untill now. What does that prove? That the person supports it? Thats ridiculous.

And then taking a few cherrypicked posts, without the context of ALL THE OTHER POSTS that are against the murder and then saying that only those posts represent left in general is simply lying.

Your list is half-baked cherry picked bs compared to a fair sample of comments I've already provided.
 
Last edited:
15th post
...

I have to acknowledge that his death may have harmed any chance of our country healing itself from this hyperpartisan political atmosphere.

I'm sorry to see the devolution occur.
Kir helped create the atmosphere and the lies you guys are spreading about this situation only continues it. This guy is no liberal. In fact, I'm willing to say he's an accelerationist and he started exactly what he wanted to see happen..
 
Kir helped create the atmosphere and the lies you guys are spreading about this situation only continues it. This guy is no liberal. In fact, I'm willing to say he's an accelerationist and he started exactly what he wanted to see happen..
That's also a lie you can't possibly prove.
 
I said he was right, in a sense. Technically she was not a DEI hire but she might as well have been given those were the criteria Biden used to select her.

As I told candycorn, I really didn't give a shit if she was or not or even that Biden chose her for those reasons. I was willing to give her the benefit of the doubt but after about a year or so it was clear to me this VP wasn't going to accomplish shit, especially about the border which she was placed in charge of.
Good, bad? :auiqs.jpg: Dude, nobody ever really cared about the VP until Trump's populism. Social media made this a fake outrage for magaturds. :rolleyes:
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
Back
Top Bottom