rylah
Gold Member
- Jun 10, 2015
- 22,975
- 4,876
- 290
It's a thread I've wanted to open for some time now,
seems the time is ripe, the situation on the ground,
especially the confused state of current politics,
and the desperation of the young generation.
The desperation is globally universal, on various levels it's a good one,
promising major progress of the human soul and unity.
That is all romantic, but what about practicality?
How is that to express in reality, and how is that progress?
Aren't we supposed to emerge with something new, away with old structures?
From Practical perspective, there's a whole range of topics to discuss,
but for the opening post I want to focus on one essential idea,
the idea of - unity of human social-political character,
rather than it's division, in favor or denial of either.
We're looking towards the broadest possible
structure capable to contain and direct the
broadest variety of human contradictions.
In other words - what structure is broad enough to meet and engage as contrasting positions,
as Hamas Islamists with Secular and Religious Zionists of all colors, Pan-Arabist Communists,
and their other radical Post-Modernist counterparts?
A Jewish king.
Royalty from river to sea, in the heart of Judea,
in some ways similar to that in Jordan, only Israeli.
Intellectually I think it's already becoming clear, at least not so shocking,
seeing the alternatives and the state of things of both West and East,
there's a will to unite those characters, sort their proper function.
But for that they need to a broad and strong enough
structure to engage them politically in one place.
Let us discuss the function of royalty in a Parliamentary Monarchy,
it's correct practical and symbolic extent, to engage a broader electoral contrast.
seems the time is ripe, the situation on the ground,
especially the confused state of current politics,
and the desperation of the young generation.
The desperation is globally universal, on various levels it's a good one,
promising major progress of the human soul and unity.
That is all romantic, but what about practicality?
How is that to express in reality, and how is that progress?
Aren't we supposed to emerge with something new, away with old structures?
From Practical perspective, there's a whole range of topics to discuss,
but for the opening post I want to focus on one essential idea,
the idea of - unity of human social-political character,
rather than it's division, in favor or denial of either.
We're looking towards the broadest possible
structure capable to contain and direct the
broadest variety of human contradictions.
In other words - what structure is broad enough to meet and engage as contrasting positions,
as Hamas Islamists with Secular and Religious Zionists of all colors, Pan-Arabist Communists,
and their other radical Post-Modernist counterparts?
A Jewish king.
Royalty from river to sea, in the heart of Judea,
in some ways similar to that in Jordan, only Israeli.
Intellectually I think it's already becoming clear, at least not so shocking,
seeing the alternatives and the state of things of both West and East,
there's a will to unite those characters, sort their proper function.
But for that they need to a broad and strong enough
structure to engage them politically in one place.
Let us discuss the function of royalty in a Parliamentary Monarchy,
it's correct practical and symbolic extent, to engage a broader electoral contrast.
Last edited: