Let's Build a Workbench!

A few O'scope makers actually built those (component testers) into their scopes and I have one that I was going to restore. . . but then I learned of the Huntron Tracker

Well, nothing beats the Huntron Tracker. My old Fluke 867 had both oscope capabilities (single channel 20 MHz bandwidth) and component tester capabilities like a poor man's Huntron, but I could not find a good photo, but I found this PDF (attached) which explains a little.


https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81qQoJTODGL._SL1500_.jpg
 

Attachments

What kind of electronics work did you do?

The "octipus" takes me way back. A few O'scope makers actually built those (component testers) into their scopes and I have one that I was going to restore. . . but then I learned of the Huntron Tracker

View attachment 1255357

Which is an Octipus with it's own CRT all in one box.

I have two actually (model 1000 and 2000) but my 2000 blew the display transformer which is no longer available. So, one of my future projects is to replace it's crt with an LCD display.

I can't wait to figure that out.
Old Navy we used them to troubleshoot circuit boards. In school it was groups of 4 that the whole group passed or failed the test if we didnt find the right problem
 
Well, nothing beats the Huntron Tracker. My old Fluke 867 had both oscope capabilities (single channel 20 MHz bandwidth) and component tester capabilities like a poor man's Huntron, but I could not find a good photo, but I found this PDF (attached) which explains a little.


https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81qQoJTODGL._SL1500_.jpg
4 to 20 ma driver nice. Plus hertz. Great for checking a small genset under load
 
Well, nothing beats the Huntron Tracker. My old Fluke 867 had both oscope capabilities (single channel 20 MHz bandwidth) and component tester capabilities like a poor man's Huntron, but I could not find a good photo, but I found this PDF (attached) which explains a little.


https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81qQoJTODGL._SL1500_.jpg
I sure needed one of those 25 Years ago!
 
Instrumentation calibrator. Unfortunstely the new one is out. Im not used to the new one.

View attachment 1255383


Nick named the T-REX
Wow, I was in industrial maintenance for years and never saw one. We did have pressure calibrators called "Drucks."

I don't think they were anything like these "communicators" though.
 
I sure needed one of those 25 Years ago!

I have one of the first 867s made. Bought it around 1994 I think. It was cutting edge SOTA then. Still a really nice scopemeter combo with several other tools built in.

Damn thing is super accurate too, especially in DCV. I actually have a print out of the accuracy of each test because I used to have to have it calibrated/tested once a year by a certification agency in order to be able to use it at work (I was working in a research lab at the time).

Actually took it with me to Atlanta in '96 to troubleshoot a problem with our cards being used in the '96 Olympics. We found the problem with the built-in frequency counter, then had Lucent come in with a Stratum II or III cesium clock from New Jersey to nail down the solution.

The internal oscillator clock on our master card here was drifting out of the capture range of the clock at the far end thus causing it to chase after the first clock trying to lock to it and neither end was ever able to lock and sync up to the T1 rate.

Almost delayed broadcast of the Olympics. That would've been real bad. You never saw anything so scary as walking into a big room full of trailers, each trailer packed full with DS1 channel banks, with each channel bank filled with 64 of our cards, all of them flashing with red error lights. :sad:
 
Wow, I was in industrial maintenance for years and never saw one. We did have pressure calibrators called "Drucks."

I don't think they were anything like these "communicators" though.
1778543942904.webp


We would use these mainly. I like the ones with the switch to draw vaccume
 
I have one of the first 867s made. Bought it around 1994 I think. It was cutting edge SOTA then. Still a really nice scopemeter combo with several other tools built in.

Damn thing is super accurate too, especially in DCV. I actually have a print out of the accuracy of each test because I used to have to have it calibrated/tested once a year by a certification agency in order to be able to use it at work (I was working in a research lab at the time).

Actually took it with me to Atlanta in '96 to troubleshoot a problem with our cards being used in the '96 Olympics. We found the problem with the built-in frequency counter, then had Lucent come in with a Stratum II or III cesium clock from New Jersey to nail down the solution.

The internal oscillator clock on our master card here was drifting out of the capture range of the clock at the far end thus causing it to chase after the first clock trying to lock to it and neither end was ever able to lock and sync up to the T1 rate.

Almost delayed broadcast of the Olympics. That would've been real bad. You never saw anything so scary as walking into a big room full of trailers, each trailer packed full with DS1 channel banks, with each channel bank filled with 64 of our cards, all of them flashing with red error lights. :sad:
Oh I've had some scares. LOL!

A small Tornado and lightning took out a small town's 911/ police and fire dispatch console at 3am. The town had no power for so long, the battery backup on their backup repeater was dying, So we were charging batteries in our vehicles and carrying them up the stairs of the courthouse to keep their backup repeater on the air. WHILE trying to fix their primary.
 
I have one of the first 867s made. Bought it around 1994 I think. It was cutting edge SOTA then. Still a really nice scopemeter combo with several other tools built in.

Damn thing is super accurate too, especially in DCV. I actually have a print out of the accuracy of each test because I used to have to have it calibrated/tested once a year by a certification agency in order to be able to use it at work (I was working in a research lab at the time).

Actually took it with me to Atlanta in '96 to troubleshoot a problem with our cards being used in the '96 Olympics. We found the problem with the built-in frequency counter, then had Lucent come in with a Stratum II or III cesium clock from New Jersey to nail down the solution.

The internal oscillator clock on our master card here was drifting out of the capture range of the clock at the far end thus causing it to chase after the first clock trying to lock to it and neither end was ever able to lock and sync up to the T1 rate.

Almost delayed broadcast of the Olympics. That would've been real bad. You never saw anything so scary as walking into a big room full of trailers, each trailer packed full with DS1 channel banks, with each channel bank filled with 64 of our cards, all of them flashing with red error lights. :sad:
Thats deeper than my DCS knowledge lol.

Gonna have to learn that Trek. Gonna go back teching for about a year then retire.

Just got back from building a Switchyard as a Superintendent. Too many hours, too many headaches. Its online though.
 
I have one of the first 867s made. Bought it around 1994 I think. It was cutting edge SOTA then. Still a really nice scopemeter combo with several other tools built in.

Damn thing is super accurate too, especially in DCV. I actually have a print out of the accuracy of each test because I used to have to have it calibrated/tested once a year by a certification agency in order to be able to use it at work (I was working in a research lab at the time).

Actually took it with me to Atlanta in '96 to troubleshoot a problem with our cards being used in the '96 Olympics. We found the problem with the built-in frequency counter, then had Lucent come in with a Stratum II or III cesium clock from New Jersey to nail down the solution.

The internal oscillator clock on our master card here was drifting out of the capture range of the clock at the far end thus causing it to chase after the first clock trying to lock to it and neither end was ever able to lock and sync up to the T1 rate.

Almost delayed broadcast of the Olympics. That would've been real bad. You never saw anything so scary as walking into a big room full of trailers, each trailer packed full with DS1 channel banks, with each channel bank filled with 64 of our cards, all of them flashing with red error lights. :sad:
So was this some early kind of multiplexing?

We had some "mux" setups in the Marines and it seems a little related.
 
The town had no power for so long, the battery backup on their backup repeater was dying,

That is what I hate most about battery-powered items (cordless), is that the batteries are always failing me when I need them the most.
 
So was this some early kind of multiplexing?
We had some "mux" setups in the Marines and it seems a little related.

You mean the channel banks? I guess it is all multiplexing of a sort. First, every customer or subscriber has his voice sampled and digitized within a limited band of frequencies just high enough and deep enough for intelligible conversation, and they ascribe that subscriber one DS0 channel, or digital service level 0. Then they take 16 of those DS0 channels, and multiplex them onto a higher service called DS1. Of course, above that, there are higher and higher services carrying more and more communication in various copper and fiber technologies.
 
You mean the channel banks? I guess it is all multiplexing of a sort. First, every customer or subscriber has his voice sampled and digitized within a limited band of frequencies just high enough and deep enough for intelligible conversation, and they ascribe that subscriber one DS0 channel, or digital service level 0. Then they take 16 of those DS0 channels, and multiplex them onto a higher service called DS1. Of course, above that, there are higher and higher services carrying more and more communication in various copper and fiber technologies.
In the Marines, I believe it was the MRC-138 (Mark one thirty eight) that could be set up for MUX. Certainly ancient by today's standards. I was never hands-on with those after school, and I was only the 2nd echelon anyway.

Years later, Motorola sent me to classes on IBM/ DCS systems RF portion, and I was only called to service that gear a couple of times with tech support talking me through that too.

The time synchronizing and all is way over my head and barely learnable enough to keep my interest. Same for digital encryption and such.

It's just amazing how advanced it can get, while still relying on basic RF principles for getting from point a to point b.
 
15th post
In the Marines, I believe it was the MRC-138 (Mark one thirty eight) that could be set up for MUX. Certainly ancient by today's standards.
Do not kid yourself, Chuz, I believe the original application for multiplexing was for military applications, for covert security, it was used as a means of scrambling the signal so that even intercepted, the enemy could not figure out what you were saying. Good stuff. Also, if I recall correctly, it might have even been a lady who came up with the idea. Revolutionized telecommunications in many ways.

Years later, Motorola sent me to classes on IBM/ DCS systems RF portion, and I was only called to service that gear a couple of times with tech support talking me through that too.
Now Motorola, there was a company that was right at the heart of the leading edge for the very best in gear back in the day.

The time synchronizing and all is way over my head
It's really very simple. The idea is to break up a communication signal into time elements so that you can either interleave many channels into one much like how a zipper locks together or, break up one signal into many time elements that must be reassembled in the right time and order to make sense of it.

Either way, both the sending end and the receiving end both must be talking the same language looking in the same locations at the same times to make sense of what the other is saying.

It almost goes without saying that at least some of the daily communication you use everyday is multiplexed and you will never even know it.
 
If you are a shade tree mechanic, woodworker, electronics tech, inventor or arts and crafts minded person, chances are you have a work area or bench for your projects.

My hope in sharing this about my own bench and build is to get some input from others and also to keep me focused on making further improvements. I'm really good at starting projects but I have a terrible record of finishing them.

It would be great if we could make this a space that is free of politics. There is no need for politics to be brought into it.

So, here we go!

This is my old bench (mess.) It was small, unorganized and might have been enough to get by, but I've always wanted more space to work on larger items. (Side note: I've been forced to retire, so I'm hoping to improve my bench so I can try to make some money working on things at home)

View attachment 1233653

This old bench served its purpose pretty well for 10 years but I wanted a fresh start. So, I drew out what I thought would be better for my needs (using paintbrush)

View attachment 1233669 View attachment 1233697

Then I started by tearing down the old bench and repurposing the legs and wood for the new.

View attachment 1233661

I bought some 2/4 plywood for the benchtop ($35) and I finished it with some stain/ polyurethane mix that I already had on hand.

So far so good but not a huge amount more room for work.

View attachment 1233673

So, I decided to use my old benchtop as a side bench and here's what that looks like. (Obviously still a work in progress)

View attachment 1233675

Please feel free to share your own benches and projects!

More pics and updates soon!

toobfreak scruffy
I built mine tool bench for woodworking, along with a large fabrication bench/outfeed table for my table saw. Also smaller benches power tools.

Tool bench has power outlets on the front corners, fabrication table has outlets on all four corners. All benches have large drawers.

Last picture is work in progress on a chest of drawers, showing the size of the fabrication table.

Bench with tools.webp
Table drawers open.webp
Sanders.webp
Dresser-2.webp
 
Last edited:
I built mine tool bench for woodworking, along with a large fabrication bench/outfeed table for my table saw. Also smaller benches power tools.

Tool bench has power outlets on the front corners, fabrication table has outlets on all four corners. All benches have large drawers.

Last picture is work in progress on a chest of drawers, showing the size of the fabrication table.

View attachment 1255462View attachment 1255465View attachment 1255466View attachment 1255467
Very nice workspace!

Lots of surface area to work with!
 
Do not kid yourself, Chuz, I believe the original application for multiplexing was for military applications, for covert security, it was used as a means of scrambling the signal so that even intercepted, the enemy could not figure out what you were saying. Good stuff. Also, if I recall correctly, it might have even been a lady who came up with the idea. Revolutionized telecommunications in many ways.


Now Motorola, there was a company that was right at the heart of the leading edge for the very best in gear back in the day.


It's really very simple. The idea is to break up a communication signal into time elements so that you can either interleave many channels into one much like how a zipper locks together or, break up one signal into many time elements that must be reassembled in the right time and order to make sense of it.

Either way, both the sending end and the receiving end both must be talking the same language looking in the same locations at the same times to make sense of what the other is saying.

It almost goes without saying that at least some of the daily communication you use everyday is multiplexed and you will never even know it.

I appreciate the genius of it all. . . I think I just resonate more with analog.
 
Back
Top Bottom