Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,102
- 245
I find that unlikely since they were willing to surrender, which North Korea never did.
Why did we have to bomb Nagasaki then? Did we just ignore any attempts to surrender during those 3 days? Or maybe we just ignored the attempts during the previous six months that we were fire bombing 67 cities in Japan.
We ignored the attempts to surrender before Hiroshima, let alone before Nagasaki. We wanted an unconditional surrender, and were willing to drop as many bombs as necessary for that to happen.
I get it, they were willing to surrender, if they could keep the military and rebuild so they could try again later, and not give up anything they took away from anyone else.
News flash, that is not surrender, that is regrouping so you can try again. That makes the bomb necessary to get a real surrender, and not one where they get to stab us in the back.