Letitia James receives SUBPOENA from the DOJ for violating President Trumps' civil rights.

MarathonMike

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
60,897
Reaction score
91,114
Points
3,645
Location
The Southwestern Desert
Let's go!!! Justice is coming for AG James. Her Stalinist attempt to destroy Donald Trump is finally going to get full scrutiny. This is in addition to the investigation into her miraculous rise in net worth through crooked real estate deals. :popcorn:

 
Let's go!!! Justice is coming for AG James. Her Stalinist attempt to destroy Donald Trump is finally going to get full scrutiny. This is in addition to the investigation into her miraculous rise in net worth through crooked real estate deals. :popcorn:

If Trump were guilty of something egregious the world could accept accountability demanded on his part.

What he faced was in my opinion, and I stated so at the time; was an insulting, dangerous and alarming abuse of power and violation of his civil rights. To go after him with the courts for taking a loan from a bank that has unlimited funds to confirm the value of the collateral, independent of even the lender making a claim, has to be a violation of his rights and suitable for some judicial recourse.

Just because he is worth billions and is a well known figure doesn't mean he should be treated unfairly by the state. Justice must be blind and not vexation in nature. The lender didn't complain and even profited from the loan (not something they can't always say in lending).

Appraisal of any asset is always as much of an art as a science. Owner goes high, lender/buyer goes low, you generally meet at some number. If the bank had any questions in their confidence in the value they loaned against there is no way in hell they would give him a loan. At worst, they might knowingly accept a higher risk due to the property or client but ultimately it is THEIR business to know what risk is acceptable. It's certainly not criminal or in the purview of an AG in a state to intervene in this private transaction.

He didn't do anything wrong and nor did the lender. This was a private loan between two entities and Trump paid it back with interest. The fine leveled against him was right out of the Soviet playbook.

If you ever wanted to tell the world that "New York is not a place you want to invest your capital", by definition this case illustrated such a declaration.

I know what's it's like to be persecuted but I'm accustomed to it living in this country, it's been going on for decades. To have your rights so publicly violated and so many American cowards unwilling to say "this is wrong what they are doing to this man" is a real damn shame. That's not the America I grew up knowing of and respecting from afar.
 
Last edited:
If Trump were guilty of something egregious the world could accept accountability demanded on his part.

What he faced was in my opinion, and I stated so at the time; was an insulting, dangerous and alarming abuse of power and violation of his civil rights. To go after him with the courts for taking a loan from a bank that has unlimited funds to confirm the value of the collateral, independent of even the lender making a claim, has to be a violation of his rights and suitable for some judicial recourse.

Just because he is worth billions and is a well known figure doesn't mean he should be treated unfairly by the state. Justice must be blind and not vexation in nature. The lender didn't complain and even profited from the loan (not something they can't always say in lending).

Appraisal of any asset is always as much of an art as a science. Owner goes high, lender/buyer goes low, you generally meet at some number. If the bank had any questions in their confidence in the value they loaned against there is no way in hell they would give him a loan. At worst, they might knowingly accept a higher risk due to the property or client but ultimately it is THEIR business to know what risk is acceptable. It's certainly not criminal orin the purview of an AG in a state to intervene in this private transaction.

He didn't do anything wrong and nor did the lender. This was a private loan between two entities and Trump paid it back with interest. The fine leveled against him was right out of the Soviet playbook.

If you ever wanted to tell the world that "New York is not a place you want to invest your capital", by definition this case illustrated such a declaration.

I know what's it's like to be persecuted but I'm accustomed to it living in this country, it's been going on for decades. To have your rights so publicly violated and so many America cowards unwilling to say "this is wrong what they are doing to this man" is a real damn shame. That's not the America I grew up knowing of and respecting from afar.
It wasn't just James, that creepy Trump hating judge Engeron should be disbarred for his absurd judgment against Trump.
 
It wasn't just James, that creepy Trump hating judge Engeron should be disbarred for his absurd judgment against Trump.
No, he should be imprisoned for life without the possibility of parole.

And E Jean Carroll should be put in an Asylum for the rest of her diseased life. Better yet, under it.

She is quite literally, insane. Like that matteres to the dimocrap scum 'judge'
 
Is he the shirtless poser sending emails to females in his gym?
That's the guy. He also bears a striking resemblance to the evil Preacher in "Poltergeist".

PREACHER.webp
 

Justice Dept. Subpoenas Office of Letitia James, Who Sued Trump for Fraud​

The Justice Department has opened an investigation into one of President Trump’s longtime adversaries, Attorney General Letitia James of New York, examining whether her office violated his civil rights in its successful fraud suit against him, according to three people with knowledge of the matter.

The acting U.S. attorney in Albany sent Ms. James’s office two subpoenas, one of which was related to the civil fraud case, which led to Mr. Trump being penalized more than half a billion dollars.

The second subpoena is related to the office’s long-running case against the National Rifle Association, the people said. Ms. James sued the organization in 2020, winning the ouster of its longtime leader, Wayne LaPierre, and sharply diminishing its power.

Two of the people familiar with the matter said that the new subpoenas were part of a broader investigation to determine whether the office violated Mr. Trump’s rights or those of others. It is a highly unusual use of a civil rights law more typically used to investigate potential racial, religious or sex discrimination, among other categories.


.........goes beyond the undeniable weaponization of the DoJ by trump and Bondi. The explanation also includes the unprecedented fact that the POTUS is a convicted criminal. At no time in our history has a prez had such a compliant AG willing to enable retribution against members of the justice system who sought to hold the prez accountable for his crimes.

James is far from the only one. There was another round of terminations among FBI officials yesterday.

More heads roll at FBI​

The Trump administration has launched another purge at the FBI, forcing out three law enforcement veterans including a former head of the agency, according to two people familiar with the developments.

Former acting director Brian Driscoll, Assistant Director in Charge of the Washington Field Office Steven Jensen, and Washington-based Special Agent Walter Giardina were informed they are being fired, according to the two people, who were not authorized to discuss the matter. Formal paperwork is expected to be issued Friday.


Then there's Jack Smith.

About that Jack Smith investigation​

JACK SMITH’s time has finally come.

The U.S. Office of Special Counsel last week launched an investigation into the man who brought two federal criminal cases against DONALD TRUMP in 2023.

But the investigation appears to be a thinly veiled political stunt aimed at placating the president, who has promised to seek retribution against the former Justice Department special counsel.

The probe focuses on whether Smith used his position as a federal government employee to engage in political activities in violation of the Hatch Act. It comes after Senate Intelligence Chair TOM COTTON (R-Ark.) requested that OSC investigate Smith for “unprecedented interference in the 2024 election.” The office, an independent agency in the executive branch, investigates whistleblower complaints and alleged violations of civil service laws. It is separate from DOJ special counsels who are appointed by the attorney general to handle politically sensitive cases.

The inquiry raises a number of questions, including: what conduct, if any, by Smith might be considered political; how the OSC could even punish him; and what Trump’s ultimate aim could be.


The conditioned response by trump's defenders is invariably to invoke specious whataboutisms. Making accusations about things Biden or Obama did wholly lacking supporting evidence. Essentially, a recitation of lies and fallacious right wing talking points that are gospel inside the parallel universe existing outside the realm of reality. The comfort they provide keeping trump fans from feeling the need to address the here and now. Perhaps because the here and now is indefensible.
 
It's on now with these fraud political lawyers who colluded with the Biden administration

This will be awesome. She can force Trump officials and NRA officials to bear witness and rehash why they lost. When they all start pleading the Fifth it will look like a circus. She could run for higher office on this. Awesomesauce!
 
15th post
It's on now with these fraud political lawyers who colluded with the Biden administration

so when Dims want to prosecute Rs for political reasons, it is legit

But when Rs want to prosecute real crimes against Ds, it is a "revenge" thing.

And they think Americans don't see the hypocrisy
 
This will be awesome. She can force Trump officials and NRA officials to bear witness and rehash why they lost. When they all start pleading the Fifth it will look like a circus. She could run for higher office on this. Awesomesauce!
Can you imagine her calling Wayne "I paid for my escort's apartment out of NRA funds" LaPierre to the stand. Juicy!
 
It's on now with these fraud political lawyers who colluded with the Biden administration

Now THIS is ACTUAL lawfare.

Hey. I have a 30,000 square foot apartment in Trump Tower to sell you. Cheap.


.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom