Leading candidate to take on Russiagate conspiracy case

[DonGlock26]

Of course.

The only one found to be deficient was the Carter Page warrant and after extensive investigation only one person could be prosecuted for making one fraudulent statement.

I believe there were 3 other warrants against associates of Trump (not Trump himself) that were fine. I don’t believe we were ever told exactly who they were against.

February 7, 2020 9:11 pm

FBI Director Christopher Wray agreed that the Justice Department and the FBI illegally surveilled Carter Page when they used British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s unverified dossier to obtain four Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants against the Trump campaign associate.

FBI director admits: Yes, surveillance of Carter Page was illegal - Washington Examiner

FBI Director Christopher Wray agreed that the Justice Department and the FBI illegally surveilled Carter Page when they used British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s unverified dossier to obtain four Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants against the Trump campaign associate. Wray made the...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

 

[struth]

Laughing at the stupidity.

Nothing will come out of this grand jury, it's just to mollify the infant.

Yeah. It was pretty stupid of you not to realize there already was one

 

[DonGlock26]

Yeah. It was pretty stupid of you not to realize there already was one

 

[JoeB131]

Yeah. It was pretty stupid of you not to realize there already was one

Naw, I don't pay attention to whatever they do to mollify the man-baby.

They don't have a case, or anywhere near one.

And I think the last thing Trump needs is to relitigate why he was showing our nuclear secrets to Kid Rock.

 

[buckeye]

That you don't appease a five-year-old throwing a tantrum.

There is leeway in where the Grand Jury is convened. It has nothing to do with tantrums.

Wow, you are vindictive in your defense of Mango Mussolini.

I didn't say a word about Trump. You people are obsessed with him. It's so weird.

 

[JoeB131]

There is leeway in where the Grand Jury is convened. It has nothing to do with tantrums.

No, grand juries should be convened where the offense happened. The "logic" that Blondi is using to desperately keep her job after jug-******* the Epstein issue is that somehow, trying to retreive the classified documents that Trump stole was part of a conspiracy to hide Russia Collusion.

 

[Mac1958]

He must be saving "Kid Rock" to run the Fed.

 

[struth]

No, grand juries should be convened where the offense happened. The "logic" that Blondi is using to desperately keep her job after jug-******* the Epstein issue is that somehow, trying to retreive the classified documents that Trump stole was part of a conspiracy to hide Russia Collusion.

The grand conspiracy took place numerous places

 

[JoeB131]

The grand conspiracy took place numerous places

Yeah, when you start getting into conspiracy theories, those are usually laughed out of court.

 

[struth]

Yeah, when you start getting into conspiracy theories, those are usually laughed out of court.

No, conspiracy to commit a crime, is in fact a seperate crime in and of itself.

 

[buckeye]

trying to retreive the classified documents that Trump stole was part of a conspiracy to hide Russia Collusion.

It was. The entire thing was related and part of the democrat conspiracy to prevent Trump from, first...being allowed to run his first presidency without the bullshit Russia, Russia, Russia!!!! weighing his first term down and second, the democrats tried to prevent Trump from running in 24.

It's all there, written down in emails, communications and documented. Plenty of whistleblowers, too. But you'll never understand it because you are brainwashed and don't care one bit how democrats lied, cheated and conspired against Trump.

 

[JoeB131]

It was. The entire thing was related and part of the democrat conspiracy to prevent Trump from, first...being allowed to run his first presidency without the bullshit Russia, Russia, Russia!!!! weighing his first term down and second, the democrats tried to prevent Trump from running in 24.

It's all there, written down in emails, communications and documented. Plenty of whistleblowers, too. But you'll never understand it because you are brainwashed and don't care one bit how democrats lied, cheated and conspired against Trump.

Wow, you guys really aren nuts, aren't you?

Trump had to commit crimes to find out about the supposed crimes committed against him because people did their jobs and followed up on reports of Russian Collusion.

I would be more worried if the FBI hadn't followed up on those reports.

 

[Lesh]

Wow, you guys really aren nuts, aren't you?

Trump had to commit crimes to find out about the supposed crimes committed against him because people did their jobs and followed up on reports of Russian Collusion.

I would be more worried if the FBI hadn't followed up on those reports.

They’ll say anything in defense of the Orange Clown

 

[struth]

Wow, you guys really aren nuts, aren't you?

Trump had to commit crimes to find out about the supposed crimes committed against him because people did their jobs and followed up on reports of Russian Collusion.

I would be more worried if the FBI hadn't followed up on those reports.

This doesn’t make sense

 

[IM2]

What civil rights was Trump denied? This is pretty absurd.

None.

 

[IM2]

Here begins another Durham investigation.

 

[Lesh]

Here begins another Durham investigation.

And the really funny part is that they base this all on the failed Durham investigation

 

[IM2]

And the really funny part is that they base this all on the failed Durham investigation

They sure are. I guess they believe everybody is as dumb as the MAGAS.

 

[JoeB131]

This doesn’t make sense

Only because you lack the brain power.

Let's say that Trump had gotten a report that the Chinese were funding Kamala's effort, or that people on Kamala's staff were cozy with Beijing?

Wouldn't you look into that, even if it turned out to ultimately not be true.

The problem was, if this was a dirty trick, as you say, the Steele Dossier would have been plastered on the front page of the NYT. Not something discussed in emails at the FBI.

 

[struth]

Only because you lack the brain power.

Let's say that Trump had gotten a report that the Chinese were funding Kamala's effort, or that people on Kamala's staff were cozy with Beijing?

Wouldn't you look into that, even if it turned out to ultimately not be true.

The problem was, if this was a dirty trick, as you say, the Steele Dossier would have been plastered on the front page of the NYT. Not something discussed in emails at the FBI.

It depends, if I knew the reports were made up paid for disinformation by the other campaign, no.

But obamagate gang did more then that, they didn’t just not look into it, they did Putin’s bidding and used that paid for disinformation and spread lies and propaganda to undermine the newly elected admin.