Lara Trump is building an army of ‘100,000 poll watchers and over 500 lawyers’ to ‘deploy’ across America in November

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This one goes out to the Doomers.

And the Leftist communists.

Enjoy your total loss.

Delicious.

Lara Trump is building an army of ‘100,000 poll watchers and over 500 lawyers’ to ‘deploy’ across America in November

Republican National Committee co-chair Lara Trump announced Friday that she and the RNC are working to raise a veritable army of “over 100,000 poll watchers and over 500 lawyers.”

nypost.com

This time, we're bringin' the HEAT.

I will be here on November 5th.

All us MAGA will be luxuriating in your anti-American howls of pain and loss.

And the realization:

THAT DONALD TRUMP IS ONCE AGAIN PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

Enjoy.

Of course, Lara Trump did jack shit but fool a bunch of gullible cultists into donating to trump's legal defense fund.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Hilarious

And again, thanks for the daily fuckup finger.

You ARE the daily fuck up! Dishonest as the day is long. LOL

 

[otto105]

You ARE the daily fuck up! Dishonest as the day is long. LOL

Hilarious


Can you try again to explain the graph in your avatar fuckup.

I need a laugh.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Hilarious


Can you try again to explain the graph in your avatar fuckup.

I need a laugh.

You're kidding right? You really are this stupid!

 

[otto105]

You're kidding right? You really are this stupid!

No, I love hai you can’t explain it.

 

[Blisterfinger]

No, I love hai you can’t explain it.

You said the graph works in your favor and I said it's a symbol of your dishonesty. What about that don't you understand?

 

[otto105]

You said the graph works in your favor and I said it's a symbol of your dishonesty. What about that don't you understand?

Hilarious


So, you can’t explain your own graph.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Hilarious


So, you can’t explain your own graph.

Well of course.

The talking point relies on people being too dumb to get it.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Hilarious


So, you can’t explain your own graph.

I've already explained it. We've been talking about this for months LOL it's a symbol of your dishonesty, congratulations, now go back to your puddle of piss

 

[otto105]

I've already explained it. We've been talking about this for months LOL it's a symbol of your dishonesty, congratulations, now go back to your puddle of piss

You have never explained it it since you don’t understand it.

You think it represents a impossibly, which it doesn’t.

 

[Blisterfinger]

You have never explained it it since you don’t understand it.

You think it represents a impossibly, which it doesn’t.

It is a symbol for your dishonesty. I know it's difficult and painful for you but it's really simple

 

[otto105]

It is a symbol for your dishonesty. I know it's difficult and painful for you but it's really simple

Dude, can you explain why you think the graph in your avatar is wrong or not.

Because it mostly shows Fat Elvis’ 2020 election loss.

 

[Arlette]

The army of poll watchers and lawyers doesn't exist. Mexico wouldn't pay for it.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Dude, can you explain why you think the graph in your avatar is wrong or not.

Because it mostly shows Fat Elvis’ 2020 election loss.

I've already explained it to you. You're just playing a game, a dishonest one. Who is fat Elvis?

 

[otto105]

I've already explained it to you. You're just playing a game, a dishonest one. Who is fat Elvis?

Explained it?

You asser that it is statistically impossible, yet never explain how that fits with facts certified by the state and three reviews of the election.

Can you do that now.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Explained it?

You asser that it is statistically impossible, yet never explain how that fits with facts certified by the state and three reviews of the election.

Can you do that now.

It is statistically impossible. Looks like it happened more than once as well. That pretty much explains it, a symbol of your dishonesty. Get it? You can slink away now to your puddle of piss

 

[otto105]

It is statistically impossible. Looks like it happened more than once as well. That pretty much explains it, a symbol of your dishonesty. Get it? You can slink away now to your puddle of pissView attachment 1025661

You keep posting that it’s statistically impossible, but facts inform us all different.

https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN27Q304/

 

[Blisterfinger]

You keep posting that it’s statistically impossible, but facts inform us all different.

https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN27Q304/

Statistically impossible happening multiple times. Right. It's a symbol of your dishonesty

 

[otto105]

Statistically impossible happening multiple times. Right. It's a symbol of your dishonestyView attachment 1025703

You haven’t proved any evidence to convince anyone this is statistically impossible. I have provided factual information of the reporting of mail in ballots.

When do you think you will provide that evidence.

 

[Blisterfinger]

You haven’t proved any evidence to convince anyone this is statistically impossible. I have provided factual information of the reporting of mail in ballots.

When do you think you will provide that evidence.

I read your article and it didn't prove that it was possible. Keep trying though. I have the symbol of your dishonesty and I will keep shoving it in your face, congratulations