otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 51,582
- 17,360
- 2,165
Again, there was no evidence presented to the courts fuckup.There were no evidentiary hearings dumbass
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again, there was no evidence presented to the courts fuckup.There were no evidentiary hearings dumbass
Court decides if they want to have hearings where the sides present evidence. That didn't happen in this case. Courts just didn't want to get involved with politicsAgain, there was no evidence presented to the courts fuckup.
You have to have evidence to support a evidentiary hearing.Court decides if they want to have hearings where the sides present evidence. That didn't happen in this case. Courts just didn't want to get involved with politics
What is an evidentiary hearing for?You have to have evidence to support a evidentiary hearing.
What is an evidentiary hearing for?
Do you even know what an evidentiary hearing is fuckup.What is an evidentiary hearing for?
I just asked you dumbass!Do you even know what an evidentiary hearing is fuckup.
I just asked you dumbass!
HilariousI just asked you dumbass!
Where did it happen the first time?Hopefully they can stop voter fraud from happening again.
Where did it happen the first time?
HilariousYou literally still have an avatar of the guy who won his Senatorial election, is more popular than ever, and isn't up for re-election til 2028.
Said otherwise?
"RESIGN!" is about as likely as you getting laid in the next decade.
Thanks for that moron, let's explore furtherHilarious
That you think an evidentiary hearing is the court looking for evidence as opposed to using evidence provided to the court for review.
Idiot
Hilarious
More Ron Johnson has never been popular in WI.
Again, your fraudsters didn’t present any evidence. You tried to ask the court to look for it.Thanks for that moron, let's explore further
Whenever there’s a legal case – either civil or criminal – the possibility exists that the court will schedule an evidentiary hearing. By definition, an evidentiary hearing is any court proceeding that involves witnesses giving testimony under oath before a judge and in some cases, presenting documentary evidence.
HilariousHe's so unpopular that he keeps winning elections.
It's truly uncanny.
Kinda like your inability to produce a single coherent thought.
We asked for a hearing. None was granted. You are so dishonest, you disgust meAgain, your fraudsters didn’t present any evidence. You tried to ask the court to look for it.
you disgust me
You have to have evidence to get a judge to grant an evidentiary hearing fuckup.We asked for a hearing. None was granted. You are so dishonest, you disgust me