Kristol: No one of relevance is talking impeachment

ClosedCaption

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
53,233
Reaction score
6,732
Points
1,830
[ame=http://youtu.be/RbXOHrI0Qiw]Bill Kristol Ana Navarro on Sarah Palin Obama Impeachment - Nobody of Relevance Talking Impeachment - YouTube[/ame]

Only Irrelevant attention whores are talking about it. No one with power, responsibility or brains
 
So, is he insinuating that Sarah Palin is a buffoon? It takes one to know one.
 
i seriously dont care what this neo-con wants to say.
 
So there's an hierarchy and pecking order in Washington? Who knew? :dunno:

I suppose that means citizens don't have a relevant voice either.
 
I do not have any confidence in the GOP to do anything, much less successfully articulate the case for impeachment to the American people. I think Obama would like for the Republicans to impeach him, and think his lawless actions are, along with the actual goals of furthering his political agenda, are intended to provoke such actions from the GOP.
 
I do not have any confidence in the GOP to do anything, much less successfully articulate the case for impeachment to the American people. I think Obama would like for the Republicans to impeach him, and think his lawless actions are, along with the actual goals of furthering his political agenda, are intended to provoke such actions from the GOP.

that's because THERE IS NO CASE FOR IMPEACHMENT

if you feel there is, set forth those violations which rise to high crimes and misdemeanors with specific sites to the sections of the law claimed to be violated.

good luck with that. :cuckoo:
 
Palin is only a US Citizen. Since when does she have a say in government?
 
Kristol is why we need to deStarkify the Republican Party
 
Two-Thirds Of Republicans Think Impeaching Obama Would Be Justified

So, apparently Sarah Palin isn't the only rightwing loon calling for impeachment.

Thinking it would be justified, and believing it should happen and is what is best for the country are two different things.

This administration has lost the vast majority of cases brought against its policies. This administration has increased the power of the executive more than any in modern history. This president has set the precedent of reform through selective enforcement of the law. It is a precedent that I think will have dangerous consequences, and one I know you will be decrying during a future GOP administration. What would happen if a future Republican president simply ordered the Commissioner of the IRS and Secretary of Health and Human Services to not enforce provisions of the ACA? How is that different than Obama directing ICE And Homeland Security from not enforcing current immigration laws?
 
Back
Top Bottom