Ketanji Should Be Disqualified

[The Original Tree]

No god wrote either of them.

God’s Word was inspired by God. One of Jesus’ Titles is The Word of God. The entire Bible Old Testament and New is about Him and what He has done to call all men back to Him and what He did to save their souls.

 

[MaryL]

That is truly pathetic.

Yes, yes it is. Being that this person is primarily nominated as a "woman". So what is a woman? Would there be so much ambiguity if SHE was asked "what is a black person"? I am sure there isn't any ambivalence on that.

 

[otto105]

God’s Word was inspired by God. One of Jesus Titles is The Word of God. The entire Bi or Old Testament and new is about Him and what He has done to call all men back to Him and what He did to save their souls.

So, god didn't write them.

Some brown skinned people 200+ after he supposedly walked the earth wrote something...

 

[Rigby5]

That is complete bullshit. There have been homosexuals in every civilization. They have always been accepted but considered aberrant as they should have been. Hell, today we have very popular and famous homosexuals. No one is persecuting them. No, this whole 'acceptance' of homosexuals is for child grooming purposes based on a false allegory that heterosexual individuals have some kind of hate for homosexuals. According to radical leftists, not agreeing with their radical points of view is called being bigoted or homophobic.

Depends on the time and place.
Like the Knights Templar were massacred due to allegations of homosexuality.
The US was pretty judgmental until the 1970s or so.

 

[Rigby5]

Yes, yes it is. Being that this person is primarily nominated as a "woman". So what is a woman? Would there be so much ambiguity if SHE was asked "what is a black person"? I am sure there isn't any ambivalence on that.

No there would be just as much ambiguity over "what is a Black person".
That is because actually whites, Asians, native Americans, etc., actually are all Blacks really, as far as chromosomes go.
The "Eve out of Africa" research proved that all races existed in and came from Africa, less than 100,000 years ago, which is not enough time for mutations to evolve.
So we are all just Africans, and we have inbred enough to bring out long existing recessive traits.
Another reason it is ambiguous is that instead of 51% Black being Black and 49% Black being white, it seem that any % Black was historically then considered Black.

 

[Rigby5]

If you’re talking Title IX but gender can’t be established then no case can be brought. If the new female justice (named after two men, BTW) can’t determine gender then it would be impossible for her to judge on any Title IX case.
Simple logic.

Sure you can ESTABLISH gender, but you would NOT want the judge to instead use their own preconceptions.
You listen to testimony.

 

[The Original Tree]

No god wrote either of them.

That’s a lie. And lies have consequences. You are responsible for the lies you believe as well as the lies you tell.

Why would you worship the father of lies, Satan who hates you and wants to destroy you?

 

[Rigby5]

Now they pretend to be something they're not.

Some may be, but it would take lots of testing to determine the facts.

 

[MaryL]

No there would be just as much ambiguity over "what is a Black person".
That is because actually whites, Asians, native Americans, etc., actually are all Blacks really, as far as chromosomes go.
The "Eve out of Africa" research proved that all races existed in and came from Africa, less than 100,000 years ago, which is not enough time for mutations to evolve.
So we are all just Africans, and we have inbred enough to bring out long existing recessive traits.
Another reason it is ambiguous is that instead of 51% Black being Black and 49% Black being white, it seem that any % Black was historically then considered Black.

We are NOT obligated to accept anyone's delusions.

 

[Rigby5]

Mismatches are very rare.

Sure, but judicial decisions have to be absolutely perfect, to fit all people.

 

[otto105]

That’s a lie. And lies have consequences. You are responsible for the lies you believe as well as the lies you tell.

Why would you worship the father of lies, Satan who hates you and wants to destroy you?

I neither represent lies or tell them in regard to any god.

 

[Rigby5]

So? I never said rare conditions don't exist, we just don't pattern society on them. We recognize them as aberrant.

We are NOT talking about patterning society.
We are talking about judicial SCOTUS rulings with absolute implications.

 

[Rigby5]

One of God's laws is 'thou shalt not murder.' So, that doesn't apply to atheists?

Murder was wrong before there were any religions.

 

[Rigby5]

Homosexuals already have every right that everyone else has. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. They don't and shouldn't have 'special' rights.

Wrong.
Until very recently, and in some states still may not, gay spouses could not get in on employee health insurance, family plans.
That is a huge expense and imposition, that is very discriminatory.

 

[The Original Tree]

So, god didn't write them.

Some brown skinned people 200+ after he supposedly walked the earth wrote something...

Plenty of God Haters like you have tried to disprove The Bible. They end up becoming believers.

Did you know they just found Joshua’s Altar?
God wants to move all men towards Him as He is their father. Why would anyone be so foolish as to reject an eternity of happiness?

Only fools and those who are deceived would reject hope, and the wonderful promises of God.

You seemed like you are confused? Did Satan tell you that you cannot tell a man from a woman, that neither he nor God exists?

Satan is the author of confusion. Stop listening to him.

 

[Rigby5]

We are NOT obligated to accept anyone's delusions.

Nothing to do with "accepting".
We are talking about historic definitions that were forced upon people.

 

[The Original Tree]

Wrong.
Until very recently, and in some states still may not, gay spouses could not get in on employee health insurance, family plans.
That is a huge expense and imposition, that is very discriminatory.

They can always marry a woman, and live like heterosexuals.

 

[meaner gene]

Wrong.
Until very recently, and in some states still may not, gay spouses could not get in on employee health insurance, family plans.
That is a huge expense and imposition, that is very discriminatory.

On a minor note. Homosexuals don't have the same right to get a wedding cake of their choice, as heterosexuals enjoy.

 

[meaner gene]

They can always marry a woman, and live like heterosexuals.

So much for your claim they have the right to "the pursuit of happiness".

 

[MaryL]

Nothing to do with "accepting".
We are talking about historic definitions that were forced upon people.

What the hell does that even mean?