Ketanji Brown Jackson sharply condemns Trump's attacks on judges

[C_Clayton_Jones]

‘Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson forcefully condemned attacks by President Donald Trump and his allies on judges who have blocked Trump administration policies, warning Thursday that the increasingly hostile rhetoric poses a dire threat to the country’s political fabric.

“The attacks are not random. They seem designed to intimidate those of us who serve in this critical capacity,” Jackson told a judges’ conference in Puerto Rico. “The threats and harassment are attacks on our democracy, on our system of government. And they ultimately risk undermining our Constitution and the rule of law.”’

Loading…

www.politico.com

Justice Brown Jackson is of course correct – Trump’s lawless, criminal attack on the judiciary is in fact a threat to democracy.

As usual, Trump and his supporters are on the wrong side of history.

 

[Pastelli]

This [kbj] is the judge that couldn't define what a woman is..

 

[excalibur]

This [kbj] is the judge that couldn't define what a woman is..

What, judges cannot be criticized?

Then we had Chuck Schumer, who tried to whip up violence against several Supreme Court Justices.
Did this mediocrity in a dirty black robe say anything back then? No? She is a 100% political hack.

 

[Pastelli]

What, judges cannot be criticized?

Of course they can be criticized

 

[toobfreak]

‘Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson forcefully condemned attacks by President Donald Trump and his allies on judges who have blocked Trump administration policies, warning Thursday that the increasingly hostile rhetoric poses a dire threat to the country’s political fabric.

And of course, the judge's actions are not the problem at all. Well, at least Jackson has aired her prejudice against Trump now where she had no business opening her mouth so is now forever removed from any possibility of being able to render any sort of neutral and objective opinion.

Justice Brown Jackson is of course correct –

Right. This skunk bait who cannot even say what a woman is (being a woman herself!) has an opinion you take seriously because she tells you what you want to hear. Me, I tend to dismiss such louts as having any worthwhile opinion when they can't even define what a woman is!

Trump’s lawless, criminal attack on the judiciary is in fact a threat to democracy.

Lawless? Name the law he broke?
Criminal attack? Name what crime he committed.
Of course you can answer neither which is why you should just shut up and not remove all doubt that you are an idiot.

 

[excalibur]

Justice Brown Jackson is of course correct – Trump’s lawless, criminal attack on the judiciary is in fact a threat to democracy.

The OP calls criticizing judges lawless, criminal, that is such a fascistic thing to say.

But hey, Dems/the left have now said judges should be allowed to break the law.

 

[struth]

‘Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson forcefully condemned attacks by President Donald Trump and his allies on judges who have blocked Trump administration policies, warning Thursday that the increasingly hostile rhetoric poses a dire threat to the country’s political fabric.

“The attacks are not random. They seem designed to intimidate those of us who serve in this critical capacity,” Jackson told a judges’ conference in Puerto Rico. “The threats and harassment are attacks on our democracy, on our system of government. And they ultimately risk undermining our Constitution and the rule of law.”’

Loading…

www.politico.com

Justice Brown Jackson is of course correct – Trump’s lawless, criminal attack on the judiciary is in fact a threat to democracy.

As usual, Trump and his supporters are on the wrong side of history.

What’s the lawless attack? It’s not like they are threatening to harm the judges like Chucky S

 

[toobfreak]

The OP calls criticizing judges lawless, criminal, that is such a fascistic thing to say.

Last I checked, an authority figure above question, reproach or criticism--- isn't that the definition of a dictator?

So here are democrats trying to /create/ a dictatorship under the promise of /PROTECTING/ us from one!

How typically Democrat--- always doing the very thing they claim to be against.

 

[1srelluc]

Jackson told a judges’ conference in Puerto Rico.

I wonder what that trip cost the taxpayer?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

And of course, the judge's actions are not the problem at all. Well, at least Jackson has aired her prejudice against Trump now where she had no business opening her mouth so is now forever removed from any possibility of being able to render any sort of neutral and objective opinion.

Ubangi Jackson forfeited all credibility when she accepted her nomination on the basis of gender and race.

 

[Concerned American]

‘Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson forcefully condemned attacks by President Donald Trump and his allies on judges who have blocked Trump administration policies, warning Thursday that the increasingly hostile rhetoric poses a dire threat to the country’s political fabric.

“The attacks are not random. They seem designed to intimidate those of us who serve in this critical capacity,” Jackson told a judges’ conference in Puerto Rico. “The threats and harassment are attacks on our democracy, on our system of government. And they ultimately risk undermining our Constitution and the rule of law.”’

Loading…

www.politico.com

Justice Brown Jackson is of course correct – Trump’s lawless, criminal attack on the judiciary is in fact a threat to democracy.

As usual, Trump and his supporters are on the wrong side of history.

I guess the fact that the court is in session doesn't mean anything to her while she is off gallivanting around the Caribbean politicking. Seems she should be in DC tending to what she is getting paid for.

 

[Concerned American]

Jackson told a judges’ conference in Puerto Rico.

I wonder what that trip cost the taxpayer?

While the court is in session.

 

[WEATHER53]

Speaking not about a case but rather about your feelings displays bias

 

[ThisIsMe]

‘Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson forcefully condemned attacks by President Donald Trump and his allies on judges who have blocked Trump administration policies, warning Thursday that the increasingly hostile rhetoric poses a dire threat to the country’s political fabric.

“The attacks are not random. They seem designed to intimidate those of us who serve in this critical capacity,” Jackson told a judges’ conference in Puerto Rico. “The threats and harassment are attacks on our democracy, on our system of government. And they ultimately risk undermining our Constitution and the rule of law.”’

Loading…

www.politico.com

Justice Brown Jackson is of course correct – Trump’s lawless, criminal attack on the judiciary is in fact a threat to democracy.

As usual, Trump and his supporters are on the wrong side of history.

Hmm, she just showed bias against trump. Does this mean she has to recuse herself on every case involving a trump policy?

 

[TheGreatSatan]

This [kbj] is the judge that couldn't define what a woman is..

Did she ever talk to a biologist?

Democrats = perverted freaks

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Did she ever talk to a biologist?

She thinks that’s someone who studies bisexuality.

 

[excalibur]

Hmm, she just showed bias against trump. Does this mean she has to recuse herself on every case involving a trump policy?

Oh, yeah.

 

[excalibur]

 

[Godboy]

‘Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson forcefully condemned attacks by President Donald Trump and his allies on judges who have blocked Trump administration policies, warning Thursday that the increasingly hostile rhetoric poses a dire threat to the country’s political fabric.

“The attacks are not random. They seem designed to intimidate those of us who serve in this critical capacity,” Jackson told a judges’ conference in Puerto Rico. “The threats and harassment are attacks on our democracy, on our system of government. And they ultimately risk undermining our Constitution and the rule of law.”’

Loading…

www.politico.com

Justice Brown Jackson is of course correct – Trump’s lawless, criminal attack on the judiciary is in fact a threat to democracy.

As usual, Trump and his supporters are on the wrong side of history.

No one cares about "DEI Jackson's" thoughts on law. She didnt get the job based on her knowledge.

 

[Concerned American]

Hmm, she just showed bias against trump. Does this mean she has to recuse herself on every case involving a trump policy?

I guess we can't expect impartiality from a DEI hire.