So far this only stands as a reminder that the cover-up of any info in an attempt to protect yourself is usually what gets you into trouble, not the accusation itself.
So far what I have read, like the other several cases, there is no 'smoking gun' / no solid evidence.
Ramirez, for example, admitted that she was highly intoxicated at the party she attended, where she claims Kavanaugh exposed himself to her.
"In the New Yorker story outlining the event, Ramirez makes some careful distinctions, saying she remembers “a penis being in front of [her] face,” that Kavanaugh was next to her, and that he pulled up his pants. She acknowledged she was heavily drunk at the time and admits to having gaps in her memory."
A total of 4 people were named as having been involved / connected to what happened and/or who were reportedly 'there':
1. Unnamed classmate: 2nd-Hand Knowledge -
'Heard About The Allegation'
2. Richard Oh: " Oh remembers a tearful female student telling a friend about an incident involving
a fake penis gag and then a student exposing himself." - A friend was told of an incident....
3rd-Hand knowledge about a 'gag'
3. James Roche: Says "Kavanaugh was a “notably heavy drinker” at the time and that “he became aggressive and belligerent when he was very drunk.” 'Heavy Drinker' is not evidence of the incident, witnessed nothing.
4. Ramirez’s mother and sister: Ramirez says she told them about a 'disturbing incident' but gave no specific details.
ZERO EVIDENCE, like Ford.
Like Ford, again, it is a
'She Said - He Said'.
Like with Ford, this would never hold up in an official trail / courtroom, which means the only court in which the Democrats have a chance of finding Kavanaugh 'Guilty' is the 'Court Of Public Opinion', which is why they will do their best to 'try' this in public ... and drag it out for as long as possible while claiming 'Kavanaugh is 'Guilty until proven innocent' - the 'burden of proof is on the accused'.
Everything we know about the allegations against Kavanaugh
.