- Jul 27, 2021
- 61,594
- 73,838
- 3,488
.Yea, this ^^^^^ makes sense.
Perhaps you simply don't grasp good sense. I've been reading your posts for way over a year and have not encountered any good sense yet.
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.Yea, this ^^^^^ makes sense.
Thanks for proving me right yet again. Dismissal involved zero laughs.When you are done with your embarrassing daily tantrum, see if you can figure out what this means. You will probably fail, but we are here to help.:
View attachment 741765
Ask Giuliani and Powell. You know, your other heroes that likewise got laughed out of court.
.No luck yet, eh? For being a self styled expert on legal documents, you sure are having a hard time figuring this simple one out.
Hahaha, you poor guy. Cry it all out. Laughed right out of court.Thanks for proving me right yet again. Dismissal involved zero laughs.
.Hahaha, you poor guy. Cry it all out. Laughed right out of court.
Now, back to the part of the ruling I showed you... did you manage to squeeze that shriveled lump between your ears and figure out what it says?
Yep, that's about what I thought. Your boy BackAgain won't figure it out either..
"Ruling"
.
Your copy paste is unrelated to the thread and a childish temper-tantrum.This thread is unrelated to anything factual.
Another victory for democracy.When you are done with your embarrassing daily tantrum, see if you can figure out what this means. You will probably fail, but we are here to help.:
View attachment 741765
Ask Giuliani and Powell. You know, your other heroes that likewise got laughed out of court.
.Yep, that's about what I thought. Your boy BackAgain won't figure it out either.
Well, because you perceive me as being somehow 'lesser than you'. Correct.Perhaps you simply don't grasp good sense. I've been reading your posts for way over a year and have not encountered any good sense yet.
.Well, because you perceive me as being somehow 'lesser than you'. Correct.
If you believe that every vote was counted, under conditions that were 80% republican, I have a bridge to sell you.What would have been the point when every single vote was counted? The "expert" even conceded, on purpose or not every vote was going to get counted, so what's the point?
If you believe that every vote was counted, under conditions that were 80% republican, I have a bridge to sell you.
Yes, everyone outside the cult believes the votes were counted.If you believe that every vote was counted, under conditions that were 80% republican, I have a bridge to sell you.
It's from the case the idiot Lake just lost..
You must believe we are as stupid as you actually are if you think we're going to believe that your "ruling" is anything but a half-assed facsimile of an questionably legal document.
But I have to give you credit for .........................
On second thought, I don't have to give you credit for anything.
.
Repeating your lie leaves it still a lie, Fart Brain.Hahaha, you poor guy. Cry it all out. Laughed right out of court.
Now, back to the part of the ruling I showed you... did you manage to squeeze that shriveled lump between your ears and figure out what it says?
LIAR. She lost because a judge set the standard of proof so high that literally NO ONE could meet it. She had to convince HIM what the STATE OF MIND of her opponent was, despite clear proof of actual AZ laws being broken. You fu(kers would be burning it down if this was done to YOU. Scum.
The standards were the same as they were for anyone. But Lake had no evidence of her lies. Naturally.LIAR. She lost because a judge set the standard of proof so high that literally NO ONE could meet it. She had to convince HIM what the STATE OF MIND of her opponent was, despite clear proof of actual AZ laws being broken. You fu(kers would be burning it down if this was done to YOU. Scum.