Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Clear headed?....She's bat shit crazy. She would have been a disaster as governor. And it's telling that you keep coming back to the same weak argument that attendance at rallies and social media likes translate into voting victories.Is your position really that weak, Jack, that all you got left to try to run from and avoid discussion of another obviously illegal and improper election fraud is to try to throw labels at the victims of it? Lake is one of the most solid and down to earth clear-headed people to hit politics in years and there isn't a single thing you can hang on her as "bat-shit crazy." Especially when the lion's share of the state agrees with her, she lead Hobbs by 11 points and Hobbs has a paltry 1000 follows compared to a MILLION by Lake!
Another "miraculous" election where a democrat puts a dollar into the change machine then gets back change for a $20 bill!
But your response might get you a bronze star if used in the CCP regime! Good, solid, party loyalty!
Really? How so? By fixing elections to work better with more transparency? Just which policy(s) of hers were crazy? Name them. And what about having a governor like Hobbs who essentially ran her own election controlling her own ballot counting making sure it ended with herself in office? Honest people make a point to steer clear of any conflict in interest. And if she was so crazy, then why did she hold an 11-point lead over Hobbs going into the election? Lemme guess Jack-- -- it was all those millions of batshit crazy people in Arizona, right?Clear headed?....She's bat shit crazy. She would have been a disaster as governor.
Sure Jack. Can you provide one instance where a person getting 95-99% of all of the public support and voter turnout at rallies and on social media turned around and was beaten in the 11th hour by someone who didn't even show her face and refused to debate? If that is such a weak argument, then you ought to be able to give instances!And it's telling that you keep coming back to the same weak argument that attendance at rallies and social media likes translate into voting victories. Same old, same old.
Nothing needs "fixing". Turnout at rallies and social media are not an indicator of voting numbers.Really? How so? By fixing elections to work better with more transparency? Just which policy(s) of hers were crazy? Name them. And what about having a governor like Hobbs who essentially ran her own election controlling her own ballot counting making sure it ended with herself in office? Honest people make a point to steer clear of any conflict in interest. And if she was so crazy, then why did she hold an 11-point lead over Hobbs going into the election? Lemme guess Jack-- -- it was all those millions of batshit crazy people in Arizona, right?
Sure Jack. Can you provide one instance where a person getting 95-99% of all of the public support and voter turnout at rallies and on social media turned around and was beaten in the 11th hour by someone who didn't even show her face and refused to debate? If that is such a weak argument, then you ought to be able to give instances!
If Lake was so batshit crazy then why didn't Hobbs avail herself of going before the camera pointing out one-by-one the failings of all her views so voters didn't vote for her?
Another unsubstantiated claim? I see once again you duck and run when asked to back up a single "batshit" crazy thing Lake believes in! Not to mention the conflict of interest in controlling your own voting. No answer there either, eh, Jack? No answers either to what happened to Lake's 11 point lead? And naturally, you can't even produce a single instance where before a couple years ago, a person running had 99% of all public support yet still lost badly at the ballot! Jack, can you even prove your not just a chinese bot???Nothing needs "fixing".
Another empty claim with no evidence substantiating it. Funny how you believe so many things Jack that you can't offer any evidence in support of!!!Turnout at rallies and social media are not an indicator of voting numbers.
Just to give the VOTERS what they are entitled to, to see and hear the candidates and where they stand on their issues in contrast to their opponent! Likely the only opportunity many voters had to really see and compare who they were supposed to vote for! People in open, fair elections in free countries tend to do that, Jack.Also, no reason to give Lake an audience.
Funny, I would have thought that if you were any good at all that you couldn't help but look good next to someone so batshit crazy! If you can't look good there, then where? Jack? Hello?Because, there's no looking good next to crazy.
Not likely ever.Lake lost. Just like her mentor did two years ago. Move on.
It's done. She lost. Move on.Another unsubstantiated claim? I see once again you duck and run when asked to back up a single "batshit" crazy thing Lake believes in! Not to mention the conflict of interest in controlling your own voting. No answer there either, eh, Jack? No answers either to what happened to Lake's 11 point lead? And naturally, you can't even produce a single instance where before a couple years ago, a person running had 99% of all public support yet still lost badly at the ballot! Jack, can you even prove your not just a chinese bot???
Another empty claim with no evidence substantiating it. Funny how you believe so many things Jack that you can't offer any evidence in support of!!!
Just to give the VOTERS what they are entitled to, to see and hear the candidates and where they stand on their issues in contrast to their opponent! Likely the only opportunity many voters had to really see and compare who they were supposed to vote for! People in open, fair elections in free countries tend to do that, Jack.
Funny, I would have thought that if you were any good at all that you couldn't help but look good next to someone so batshit crazy! If you can't look good there, then where? Jack? Hello?
Not likely ever.
www.cnn.com
Lake ain't going nowhere, buddy.It's done. She lost. Move on.
Getting lots of traction everywhere except up your ass where you apparently find worthless opinion pieces from a failing leftwing rag!You notice how the cries of "FRAUD!!" aren't getting any traction this year?
Elaborate on which items of her political platform you disagree with.Clear headed?....She's bat shit crazy. She would have been a disaster as governor. And it's telling that you keep coming back to the same weak argument that attendance at rallies and social media likes translate into voting victories.
Same old, same old.
Like your savior, she lost. I would just deal with it and move on.
Elaborate on which items of her political platform you disagree with.
On the grounds she's a whack job. Nothing required beyond that.Elaborate on which items of her political platform you disagree with.
I suppose Hobbs has learnt to not wrestle pigs in mud.If Lake was so batshit crazy then why didn't Hobbs avail herself of going before the camera pointing out one-by-one the failings of all her views so voters didn't vote for her?
On the grounds she's a whack job. Nothing required beyond that.
We all want election integrity.Now she wants to fight for election integrity, something all Americans should want.
You've had 2 years to prove fraud, and the BEST you got is............fight this to the bitter end until she exposes the problem to where it can no longer just be ignored and swept under the rug again like 2020.
Sure you do, by utterly deconstructing elections to where they are now a bigger mess than ever!We all want election integrity.
Yep, voting on election day and knowing the winner by bedtime election night like we did for 250 years sure would bring chaos.You appear to just want chaos.
She is relevant and will stay that way, she ain't going nowhere, believe me.Lakes denial is about staying relevant
Really? To who? What legal body is examining the issue, much less seriously? The courts gave Trump a mere SIX WEEKS not two years to gather and make cases across SIX STATES then told him he lacked standing to complain and should have filed BEFORE the election, cupcake.You've had 2 years to prove fraud
Name one thing about Trump's policies that wasn't good or pro-American.You've done an exceptional job of convincing yourself that ALL things trump are good and Pro-America.
Funny, you libs have been saying that since 2016 before he even took office!!!you have to move on from trump.
Running up the deficit by trillions upon trillions of dollars?Name one thing about Trump's policies that wasn't good or pro-American.
Thanks for admitting you’re an ignoramus.On the grounds she's a whack job. Nothing required beyond that.
Nuff said.
Thanks for continuously confirming for me that you are FOS.Thanks for admitting you’re an ignoramus.
The right's war on democracy continues.America needs more like her.
---“This case is not about money or gain,” Lake’s campaign spokesperson, Ross Trumble, told the news outlets in a statement. “It was essentially a public interest lawsuit seeking electoral integrity. It is very very rare to sanction a party in public interest suits. All in all this reads like an angry Obama appointee who wants to send a message. The message is if you lose shut up and don’t come to court. The message is not that you lost a case or acted in bad faith.”---
Kari Lake Responds to Judge Who Sanctioned Her Legal Team in Lawsuit
The campaign of Arizona Republican candidate Kari Lake responded to a district court imposing a fine on her lawyers after filing an election-related lawsuit earlier this year. Judge John Tuchi of the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, who rejected a Lake lawsuit earlier this year...www.ntd.com
