woodwork201
Diamond Member
- Mar 2, 2021
- 4,631
- 2,848
- 1,938
They definitely violate the 2nd Amendment.So the gun laws in Chicago and nyc boston are just A figment of the imagination?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They definitely violate the 2nd Amendment.So the gun laws in Chicago and nyc boston are just A figment of the imagination?
Bull crap. Get behind protection outside and use a bullhorn. Most no-knock warrants, though, are not arrest warrants, they're search warrants. The fear that someone will flush a bag of weed before the cops get inside leads to the deaths of innocent bystanders, wrong houses, and dead cops. There's no reason at all for a no-knock warrant - EVER.Basically, you can't ban no-knock warrants entirely. What if the police are going to arrest an armed member of some violent gang? But the use of that should be restricted and regulated.
Do you know of any police department or judge that wouldn't tell you today that they use extreme caution? And even if they tightened up for a while, they'll slip into the current ways because that's human nature.I don't know that I'd support an outright ban on no-knock warrants. But they certainly need to be used with extreme caution, with the awareness that they create a very real risk that either a police officer or an innocent citizen, will wind up dead as a result of one being carried out. Before a no-knock warrant is issued, there needs to be a very high standard of determining that the risk posed by the subject of such a warrant is so great as to justify the risk to innocent life, and that there is no less risky alternative. And judges who are careless in issuing such warrants, and officers who are careless in carrying them out, need to be held criminally responsible when this carelessness results in innocent deaths.
Serious reform is outlawing no knock warrants.Yes, but this also has disadvantages. Passers by, a suspect not being confined by the walls etc.
In any case, you can't just outlaw no-knock warrants without some serious reform, because sometimes the police are going to arrest really bad guys and they should be able to protect their lives.
Hopefully, you're being facetious and aren't that goofy.Bull crap. Get behind protection outside and use a bullhorn. Most no-knock warrants, though, are not arrest warrants, they're search warrants. The fear that someone will flush a bag of weed before the cops get inside leads to the deaths of innocent bystanders, wrong houses, and dead cops. There's no reason at all for a no-knock warrant - EVER.
I'm very serious. There is no need for Rambo-style policing, bursting in doors and guns-a-blazing. Just because it makes for good theater and TV does not mean it's appropriate in real life in a free country.Hopefully, you're being facetious and aren't that goofy.
I realize you're just trolling, looking for an argument but really, what good does it serve for you to intentionally look foolish?
Shoot first, ask questions later
I already said in this thread that no-knock warrants came along with the war on drugs, or more correctly, were considered as a tool of it. Basically, you can't just get rid of these warrants without rethinking the war on drugs policy.Bull crap. Get behind protection outside and use a bullhorn. Most no-knock warrants, though, are not arrest warrants, they're search warrants. The fear that someone will flush a bag of weed before the cops get inside leads to the deaths of innocent bystanders, wrong houses, and dead cops. There's no reason at all for a no-knock warrant - EVER.
No, you're not serious, you're just trolling.I'm very serious. There is no need for Rambo-style policing, bursting in doors and guns-a-blazing. Just because it makes for good theater and TV does not mean it's appropriate in real life in a free country.
If you have the right to defend yourself in your home but the police can legally kill you for doing it then you have no right to defend yourself even from burglars because you have to wait to make sure they're not police before you defend yourself. By that time, they have the upper hand and are in control of the situation.
This is not supposed to be a police state but the war on drugs and the no-knock warrants that came from them have turned us into one. It needs to end.
I already said in this thread that no-knock warrants came along with the war on drugs, or more correctly, were considered as a tool of it. Basically, you can't just get rid of these warrants without rethinking the war on drugs policy.
I've never been arrested for anything, including drugs.No, you're not serious, you're just trolling.
You're advocating that police notify a wanted felon, in this case, someone wanted for murder. The police should go door to door and evacuate dozens of neighbors putting the wanted person on alert. So now you have alerted someone capable of murder, in a residence, with unknown weapons and unknown hostages.
Yeah, what a plan!
As opposed to surprising the criminal with a massive force and takedown before the person has a chance to react.
You're got a few drug busts on your record, don't you? Otherwise, why in the heck would you demand police and private citizens be put at great risk of injury or death?
We are blessed that you are not in any position of authority.
No it’s not. If the police have a need to interact with you in this way, you’re already sub-human scum. If you fail to follow their commands, even more so. He deserved what he got.
No, you're not serious, you're just trolling.
You're advocating that police notify a wanted felon, in this case, someone wanted for murder. The police should go door to door and evacuate dozens of neighbors putting the wanted person on alert. So now you have alerted someone capable of murder, in a residence, with unknown weapons and unknown hostages.
Yeah, what a plan!
As opposed to surprising the criminal with a massive force and takedown before the person has a chance to react.
You're got a few drug busts on your record, don't you? Otherwise, why in the heck would you demand police and private citizens be put at great risk of injury or death?
We are blessed that you are not in any position of authority.
I can think of one.Bull crap. Get behind protection outside and use a bullhorn. Most no-knock warrants, though, are not arrest warrants, they're search warrants. The fear that someone will flush a bag of weed before the cops get inside leads to the deaths of innocent bystanders, wrong houses, and dead cops. There's no reason at all for a no-knock warrant - EVER.
No it’s not. If the police have a need to interact with you in this way, you’re already sub-human scum. If you fail to follow their commands, even more so. He deserved what he got.
That attitude shows me why Black Lives Matter had so much support.No it’s not. If the police have a need to interact with you in this way, you’re already sub-human scum. If you fail to follow their commands, even more so. He deserved what he got.
So you should always do as the police say?
Sounds a little fascist... oh wait, it's you.... no surprises there then.
There will always be bad people in every profession. It’s better to stay alive, and fight the issue out in court afterwards than have “He was Right” engraved on your tombstone.Riiiiight......because corrupt cops do not exist......
And the politicians controlling them are always great, honest and wonderful people!
Got it!!
What a statist bitch you must be.
YES. If I have an issue with it I take it up with the proper people after the fact.So you should always do as the police say?
Authoritarian; and proud of it.Sounds a little fascist... oh wait, it's you.... no surprises there then.
Oh? Care to share your revelation with the rest of the class.That attitude shows me why Black Lives Matter had so much support