Funny how liberals have no issue using the welfare state to force their morality on you, but squeal like stuck pigs if someone tries to force their morality on them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
A great post because i always talk to the operators at my company and once again the subject of what I make comes up.and my answer is always the sameThats exactly it. Ask the libs here if they'd favor a 100% income tax on incomes over $100k and I guarantee every one will be for it. Because they've never made 100k in their lives so they conceive of anyone needing more than that.Its the classic problem of democracy: the have nots are more numerous and figure out they can help themselves to what the haves have. This is why early states imposed a land owner or freehold requirement on voting. It's a shame we did away with it.I dont think anyone questioned whether someone had the right to do that. The question was whether it wasnt hypocritical of libs to force others to support programs that they want.The People have the right to decide to use the government to help the poor.
That's the problem. Many of those doing the deciding aren't funding the things on which they decide. On top of that, many receiving are the ones deciding that others should be forced to help them.
They don't have a problem with whatever percentage of taxes is taken to fund the programs they support. It could be 10% or 100%. If they pay 0%, it doesn't affect them.
Ask the libs here if they'd favor a 100% income tax on incomes over $100k and I guarantee every one will be for it.
You know that was just a Hypothetically questionAsk the libs here if they'd favor a 100% income tax on incomes over $100k and I guarantee every one will be for it.
Go ahead and ask them then. It will be fun to watch you learn you are dead wrong.
You know that was just a hypoleticalAsk the libs here if they'd favor a 100% income tax on incomes over $100k and I guarantee every one will be for it.
Go ahead and ask them then. It will be fun to watch you learn you are dead wrong.
Rabbi: DO you favor a 100% income tax over 100k?I am looking forward to seeing a reverse reflex labeling by Rabbi. Up to now, one is labeled a "liberal" if one disagrees with a far right winger.
It will be fun to watch this exchange:
RABBI: Do you favor a 100% income tax on incomes over $100k?
LIBERAL: No way.
RABBI: You must not be a liberal then.
Lol kind of funnyI am looking forward to seeing a reverse reflex labeling by Rabbi. Up to now, one is labeled a "liberal" if one disagrees with a far right winger.
It will be fun to watch this exchange:
RABBI: Do you favor a 100% income tax on incomes over $100k?
LIBERAL: No way.
RABBI: You must not be a liberal then.
Rabbi: DO you favor a 100% income tax over 100k?I am looking forward to seeing a reverse reflex labeling by Rabbi. Up to now, one is labeled a "liberal" if one disagrees with a far right winger.
It will be fun to watch this exchange:
RABBI: Do you favor a 100% income tax on incomes over $100k?
LIBERAL: No way.
RABBI: You must not be a liberal then.
Liberal: No, but I'd favor one over 250k
G5000: See, you're wrong!
YupYou know that was just a hypoleticalAsk the libs here if they'd favor a 100% income tax on incomes over $100k and I guarantee every one will be for it.
Go ahead and ask them then. It will be fun to watch you learn you are dead wrong.
Is "hypoletical" a portmanteau of hyperbole and theoretical?
So if one self-described liberal says the rate should be 99% instead of 100% then you are correct?Rabbi: DO you favor a 100% income tax over 100k?I am looking forward to seeing a reverse reflex labeling by Rabbi. Up to now, one is labeled a "liberal" if one disagrees with a far right winger.
It will be fun to watch this exchange:
RABBI: Do you favor a 100% income tax on incomes over $100k?
LIBERAL: No way.
RABBI: You must not be a liberal then.
Liberal: No, but I'd favor one over 250k
G5000: See, you're wrong!
One liberal who thinks there should be a 100 percent top tax rate is not "every one".
You made the claim.So if one self-described liberal says the rate should be 99% instead of 100% then you are correct?Rabbi: DO you favor a 100% income tax over 100k?I am looking forward to seeing a reverse reflex labeling by Rabbi. Up to now, one is labeled a "liberal" if one disagrees with a far right winger.
It will be fun to watch this exchange:
RABBI: Do you favor a 100% income tax on incomes over $100k?
LIBERAL: No way.
RABBI: You must not be a liberal then.
Liberal: No, but I'd favor one over 250k
G5000: See, you're wrong!
One liberal who thinks there should be a 100 percent top tax rate is not "every one".
You are crab walkign from this challenge so fast my head is spinning. You havent even lost yet.
Not bragging much, don't know about you, but been giving to my favorite charity saint judes hospital once a month for the past 10 years or so, they have my credit card On file, never paid attention. I know it's not much but I know they get something from me.And in the Wonderful Land of Conservatopia, everything happens by magic.