So Ellen Degeneres and Miley Cyrus are racists is that what you are saying?
I have said many times that I believe all white people are racist. I did not say all white people are evil. Or that all white people hate black people. I said that all white people are racist.
Do you believe that black slaves were breed by their slave masters to be dumb and strong and as a result the entire black race is actually
less intelligent and more athletic then whites, i.e. NBA nearly 75% black.. NFL nearly 70% black.
It must be remembered that the original story was that black people were inferior, body and brains.
In the 1936 Olympics Hitler was still confident that his Aryan athletes would dominate the Black American sprinters. Because Jessie Owens. That did not happen.
So the White Supremacists pretended that they had never believed that White people were physically superior to Black people and that their ideas had not been embarrassingly refuted. They just figured that brains were more important, so if Black people were to be sold to the world as inferior, it would have to be based on us being genetically stupid.In some sports whites don't have the system of white supremacy to help them.
The fact that 70% of the NFL is black or NBA is 75% means nothing.
Something as major as an additional pair of muscles would have required major evolutionary changes. Or a loss of a pair of muscles, since all humans evolved from a common ancestor. In order for black people to have "an extra muscle" from other human beings there would have to be fixed genetic differences between races.
Meaning a clear break
Indeed this seems like a speciation level difference to be frank, such as "Blacks" having a gene for X and no one else. This is absolutely clearly not the case. Not a shadow of a doubt.
I mean you say the NBA is 75% black
So what ? If black people are physically more capable of playing basketball then why don't blacks dominate volleyball the same way ?
You have to be tall and have great jumping ability in volleyball. Yeah sure you’ll find 75% of African Americans in the NBA but you won’t find many West Africans, who are certainly “blacker” and according to the theory, athleticism and blackness somehow run together.
Well in that case you'd expect West Africans to dominate the NBA and African teams to dominate international basketball competitions. Apart USA black basketball teams are countries representing black nations are very average
Or why aren't all championship high jumpers black ?
- Every player who has ever won an NHL scoring title is white.
- Every Olympic weightlifting record is held by a caucasian.
- All championship speed skaters are white.
- Every major league pitcher who has ever won 300 games is white.
- Almost all Olympic champions rowers and kayakers are white,
I don't believe for one instant the whites are physically advantaged in shooting, hockey pucks, lifting barbells, skating, or rowing, do you ?
There are actually very good reasons why track and field and boxing events are dominated the way they are; because that's who trains and competes in them. Boxing is generally for people who have limited opportunities. Racism limits your opportunities.
And yes Africans have been ahead of the rest of the world in long distance training methods for thirty years; it's no surprise they dominate the competitions.
Fact is people from a geographic region of Africa are the world's champion sprinters and a different group of people from a geographic region of Africa are the world's champion marathon runners and both are alleged to be part of some specific "race" you have just argued against sprinting or distance running as being a "racial" characteristic. Since the 2 groups you tried to put into one "race" have contradictory abilities.
Black people are well aware that system is against us. So that kinds steels an inner toughness within black people. Some one once said "It's not really a sport with black people" that's why when blk people come into sports, when it's an even playing field. We dominate. Not so much because that natural athletic ability stuff. More that the system of racism makes black men know they have to try harder.
This is Simone Maneul.
She is the fastest swimmer in the she's the current world and Olympic champion in 100m freestyle
Despite the fact that participation rates in swimming for black people are very low. When she received the gold medal the BBC showed it live while NBC showed a tape of Russian gymnasts.
White people just need to stay out of our way and watch more and more of us break your little records and set our own. Simone Biles crushed the white competition in a sport that is usually dominated by Eastern
Europeans and the Chinese.
You wouldn't even hear of Micheal Phelps if black ppl took swimming seriously but "
if it don't pay, we don't play" so black people generally don't go for minority sports like swimming.
Black people can do fine in any pursuit once even a single rusty hole appears in the steel obstacles put in our way.
Now as far as intelligence:
Around the world, the average IQ for East Asians centers around 106;
for Whites, about 100; and
for Blacks about 85 in the U.S. and 70 in sub-Saharan Africa.
Race differences in average IQ are largely genetic
Now people like you say the IQ tests are biased towards whites. Right. Reading/writing/math that's what most IQ tests have measured.
Does that sound biased in today's world? What would a unbiased IQ test be?
If you are trying to ground IQ as a genetic product of race the very first thing you need to do is offer up a genetic or biological definition of race, something no one has not done nor has any study.
Go on try, let me have a good laugh. But I’ll sit back, invite you to give me such a definition. Mainly because your fumbling attempts to define race point out just how subjective such definitions are. In close to a decade of debating race with guys like you.
I have yet to see any one of them -
No matter what their scientific credentials - offer up an acceptably neutral definition of race.
Which are those “races” then, purely scientifically speaking and in clear text ?
What are the precise genetic criteria for making this classification ?
Those questions can obviously only be answered in arbitrary dimensions which are man-made constructs according to human perception alone.
However you twist it, you will run in circles and eventually spiral back into concepts based on human perception alone.
Do you even know what a scientific fact is ?
A scientific fact is that rain water freezes at 0°C at a pressure of 1 bar.
There’s no human choice involved. It’s observable and reproducible anywhere by anybody in the exact same way. Now a scientific fact, peer-reviewed, confirmed and approved, can have political consequences. Using the simple water example, it means that public administration, set into function by politics, orders winter road service to get ready once the temperatures fall below 0°C and the roads are wet.
But yet you throw around concepts that have no constant repeatability everywhere you try to reproduce the experiment or apply the theoretical claim.
In natural science, only one single significant deviation is enough to render the claim at least disputable, at worst invalid.
The reality is that there is not only one but a multitude of deviations that those “scientists” choose to ignore.
In neurology no one takes IQ seriously. It is archaic and only really useful to social scientists. Neurologists who have a better understanding of how the brain works because they spend decades of their lives studying it have little to no use for it, but to the public at large it is so important.
Because the public is only concerned with what feels like it should be true rather than what is actually the case in reality