Judging.. Judges, the Trump effect..

[Moonglow]

Is there any doubt that Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor are left wing activists.

Yes, yes and yes. Is there any doubt that you're butthurt that we are not an Ein Partei Staat?
Tough titty. It's how the world works.

 

[Lumpy 1]

So according to many Democrats and Republicans, the media talking heads and whomever is interested, it seems questioning a judges race motivations, integrity, political affiliations, judgements, etc. is unacceptable because judges are far superior to the common man and a protected class..

Me .. I call bullshit, they're just as loony as the rest of us.

Point is, do minorities or women want trump appointing the next supreme Court justices? The answer is **** no. Now I understand wanting him over kasich Cruz jeb rubio Christie huckabee Paul carson or fiorino but he honestly shouldn't be president

Nope the point is, Judges deserve just as much scrutiny as anyone else in power, they are human, make mistakes and can be corrupted in their judgements.

and .. of course left wing activist don't want Trump appointing judges .. currently they're active in promoting their traditional Democratic Socialist Party race card and lyin Hillary women's card.

 

[SwimExpert]

he turns around and hands the case to law firms who have given the Clintons hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The **** are you talking about?

 

[Moonglow]

Then his lawyers should have done their job and filed for a new judge, before the suit began...

 

[Moonglow]

he turns around and hands the case to law firms who have given the Clintons hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The **** are you talking about?

I guess she thinks that NYC contracts out their prosecuting attorney positions..

 

[Pogo]

So according to many Democrats and Republicans, the media talking heads and whomever is interested, it seems questioning a judges race motivations, integrity, political affiliations, judgements, etc. is unacceptable because judges are far superior to the common man and a protected class..

Me .. I call bullshit, they're just as loony as the rest of us.

Point is, do minorities or women want trump appointing the next supreme Court justices? The answer is **** no. Now I understand wanting him over kasich Cruz jeb rubio Christie huckabee Paul carson or fiorino but he honestly shouldn't be president

Nope the point is, Judges deserve just as much scrutiny as anyone else in power, they are human, make mistakes and can be corrupted in their judgements.

and .. of course left wing activist don't want Trump appointing judges .. currently they're active in promoting their traditional Democratic Socialist Party race card and lyin Hillary women's card.

NOOO, the point is you don't make a point by going "waaah, the judge has Mexican ancestry" just because he says yes, the fraud suit against you can proceed as the legal process prescribes. Period.

That's exactly why I noted at the beginning that you haven't made a point here. Not that that's anything new.

Slow thread day....

 

[SwimExpert]

he turns around and hands the case to law firms who have given the Clintons hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The **** are you talking about?

I guess she thinks that NYC contracts out their prosecuting attorney positions..

That would make even less sense, because Curiel is the judge in the CA case. The CA case was brought by former customers of Trump U.

 

[Pogo]

The democrat party has a history of appointing fringe intellects and radical activists to judgeships. FDR appointed a "former" member of the KKK to the supreme court because the democrat party needed the KKK to keep upity Blacks and Papists in line. Justice Black in turn justified FDR's incarceration of Japanese American citizens. Today the democrats have dropped their affiliation with the KKK but the influx of illegal aliens poses a potential voting block so membership by appointed Hispanic judges to the racially motivated "La Raza" organization is seen as a positive thing and defended by the democrat party..

You posted the same drivel earlier today and I made you look ridiculous then too. You must be a masochist. As you wish, here it is again....

The KKK was anti-black, anti-Jew, anti-Catholic, anti-immigrant and anti-labor union. ALL of those are Democratic (not "democrat") Party constituents. How much of a moron do you have to be to imagine an organization deliberately suppressing its own support base?

The Klan had no "political affiliation". When it dabbled at all it did so through whatever party worked for the occasion --- such as here .....

​

Next time you run this mythology it'll sting more. Of course, that seems to be what you want...

See my signature...OCDPogo just doesn't learn a lesson when it comes to the KKK!

Your signature is a completely fraudulent fake quote. I wiped the floor with your sorry trenchcoat-flasher ass and I'll do it again.

(/offtopic)

OCDPogo, I DO have the hyperlink to the entire topic, makes you look like the you are!

So do I -- from every time I've obliterated this mythology, and I can combine 'em all.

Don't like the ass whupping? Then don't traffic in mythmaking.

 

[Lumpy 1]

The democrat party has a history of appointing fringe intellects and radical activists to judgeships. FDR appointed a "former" member of the KKK to the supreme court because the democrat party needed the KKK to keep upity Blacks and Papists in line. Justice Black in turn justified FDR's incarceration of Japanese American citizens. Today the democrats have dropped their affiliation with the KKK but the influx of illegal aliens poses a potential voting block so membership by appointed Hispanic judges to the racially motivated "La Raza" organization is seen as a positive thing and defended by the democrat party..

Start again, there is no democrat party

Yes indeed the official title is, "Democratic Socialist Party Freeloaders and Lemmings"....

Nope, try again..

I don't wanna, I'm happy with my response...

Of course you are. All you do is post stupid inane shit and then when called on it pretend it was all a "joke".

It's tired, Lumpster.

You'd make a perfect (bought off) liberal judge and have your diaper changed, you're cranky...

 

[Moonglow]

he turns around and hands the case to law firms who have given the Clintons hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The **** are you talking about?

I guess she thinks that NYC contracts out their prosecuting attorney positions..

That would make even less sense, because Curiel is the judge in the CA case. The CA case was brought by former customers of Trump U.

Well shut my mouf....

 

[Pogo]

he turns around and hands the case to law firms who have given the Clintons hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The **** are you talking about?

PWI methinks.

 

[Pogo]

Start again, there is no democrat party

Yes indeed the official title is, "Democratic Socialist Party Freeloaders and Lemmings"....

Nope, try again..

I don't wanna, I'm happy with my response...

Of course you are. All you do is post stupid inane shit and then when called on it pretend it was all a "joke".

It's tired, Lumpster.

You'd make a perfect liberal judge and have your diaper changed, you're cranky...

See what I mean? Run away as usual, wimpy.

 

[Vigilante]

The democrat party has a history of appointing fringe intellects and radical activists to judgeships. FDR appointed a "former" member of the KKK to the supreme court because the democrat party needed the KKK to keep upity Blacks and Papists in line. Justice Black in turn justified FDR's incarceration of Japanese American citizens. Today the democrats have dropped their affiliation with the KKK but the influx of illegal aliens poses a potential voting block so membership by appointed Hispanic judges to the racially motivated "La Raza" organization is seen as a positive thing and defended by the democrat party..

You posted the same drivel earlier today and I made you look ridiculous then too. You must be a masochist. As you wish, here it is again....

The KKK was anti-black, anti-Jew, anti-Catholic, anti-immigrant and anti-labor union. ALL of those are Democratic (not "democrat") Party constituents. How much of a moron do you have to be to imagine an organization deliberately suppressing its own support base?

The Klan had no "political affiliation". When it dabbled at all it did so through whatever party worked for the occasion --- such as here .....

​

Next time you run this mythology it'll sting more. Of course, that seems to be what you want...

See my signature...OCDPogo just doesn't learn a lesson when it comes to the KKK!

Your signature is a completely fraudulent fake quote. I wiped the floor with your sorry trenchcoat-flasher ass and I'll do it again.

(/offtopic)

OCDPogo, I DO have the hyperlink to the entire topic, makes you look like the you are!

So do I -- from every time I've obliterated this mythology, and I can combine 'em all.

Don't like the ass whupping? Then don't traffic in mythmaking.

Click on the little arrow on my signature and read the whole thing from April 1, 2014...I've been ***** slapping you that long....Oh, what about your million dollar bet you lost...I have that and a few others, because you are such a ******* moron!

 

[Pogo]

Then his lawyers should have done their job and filed for a new judge, before the suit began...

And before the petulant man-child decided to melt down with yet another spoiled-brat moment because --horrors-- he didn't get his way.

 

[Vigilante]

Both Obama and Hillary have eviscerated public servants/judges when decisions did not got their way. REMEMBER THE SOTU ADDRESS WHERE HE ABUSED ALL THE SCOTUS OVER THE CITIZEN UNITED DECISION???THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT DONALD TRUMP SAID ABOUT THE JUDGE AND WHAT THE TWO ELECTED SAID ABOUT WHOMEVER...IS THAT OBAMA AND HILLARY ARE ELECTED...TRUMP IS A FREE CITIZEN BEHOLDEN TO NO ONE AND TRUMP HAS BEEN PROVEN 99% CORRECT IN HIS OUTSPOKENNESS...HE DOESN'T SEND IN OTHERS TO DO THE SPEAKING FOR HIM.

 

[Lumpy 1]

So according to many Democrats and Republicans, the media talking heads and whomever is interested, it seems questioning a judges race motivations, integrity, political affiliations, judgements, etc. is unacceptable because judges are far superior to the common man and a protected class..

Me .. I call bullshit, they're just as loony as the rest of us.

Point is, do minorities or women want trump appointing the next supreme Court justices? The answer is **** no. Now I understand wanting him over kasich Cruz jeb rubio Christie huckabee Paul carson or fiorino but he honestly shouldn't be president

Nope the point is, Judges deserve just as much scrutiny as anyone else in power, they are human, make mistakes and can be corrupted in their judgements.

and .. of course left wing activist don't want Trump appointing judges .. currently they're active in promoting their traditional Democratic Socialist Party race card and lyin Hillary women's card.

NOOO, the point is you don't make a point by going "waaah, the judge has Mexican ancestry" just because he says yes, the fraud suit against you can proceed as the legal process prescribes. Period.

That's exactly why I noted at the beginning that you haven't made a point here. Not that that's anything new.

Slow thread day....

It should be obvious to you by now that generally your judgements mean crap to me and most everyone else gifted with critical thought. Why waste our time with your needless drivel, Freakshow Pogo.

 

[NYcarbineer]

So according to many Democrats and Republicans, the media talking heads and whomever is interested, it seems questioning a judges race motivations, integrity, political affiliations, judgements, etc. is unacceptable because judges are far superior to the common man and a protected class..

Me .. I call bullshit, they're just as loony as the rest of us.

You can question them all you want.

 

[NYcarbineer]

So according to many Democrats and Republicans, the media talking heads and whomever is interested, it seems questioning a judges race motivations, integrity, political affiliations, judgements, etc. is unacceptable because judges are far superior to the common man and a protected class..

Me .. I call bullshit, they're just as loony as the rest of us.

Point is, do minorities or women want trump appointing the next supreme Court justices? The answer is **** no. Now I understand wanting him over kasich Cruz jeb rubio Christie huckabee Paul carson or fiorino but he honestly shouldn't be president

Nope the point is, Judges deserve just as much scrutiny as anyone else in power, they are human, make mistakes and can be corrupted in their judgements.

and .. of course left wing activist don't want Trump appointing judges .. currently they're active in promoting their traditional Democratic Socialist Party race card and lyin Hillary women's card.

NOOO, the point is you don't make a point by going "waaah, the judge has Mexican ancestry" just because he says yes, the fraud suit against you can proceed as the legal process prescribes. Period.

That's exactly why I noted at the beginning that you haven't made a point here. Not that that's anything new.

Slow thread day....

It should be obvious to you by now that generally your judgements mean crap to me and most everyone else gifted with critical thought. Why waste our time with your needless drivel, Freakshow Pogo.

You're not gifted, you're special. There's a big difference.

 

[NYcarbineer]

So according to many Democrats and Republicans, the media talking heads and whomever is interested, it seems questioning a judges race motivations, integrity, political affiliations, judgements, etc. is unacceptable because judges are far superior to the common man and a protected class..

Me .. I call bullshit, they're just as loony as the rest of us.

Do you really think every defendant is entitled to a judge with whom he agrees politically?

Seriously?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Not only is Curiel a member of the La Raza Lawyers of California but he turns around and hands the case to law firms who have given the Clintons hundreds of thousands of dollars.

What a freaking hit job!

Have Trump's lawyers filed suit to have the judge removed?