What is that? To do whatever Trump tells you to.
Judges Order The Trump Administration To Use Contingency Funds For SNAP Payments During The Shutdown.
- Thread starter 0311
- Start date
Silent Warrior
Diamond Member
No, simply for them to obey actual law rather than try to legislate from the bench.
WEATHER53
Diamond Member
- Apr 13, 2017
- 39,324
- 27,956
- 2,915
This is about half way to being an actual question
Try reorganizing and completing it
- Sep 19, 2020
- 8,973
- 10,475
- 2,138
BOSTON -- Two federal judges ruled nearly simultaneously on Friday that President Donald Trump's administration must continue to fund SNAP, the nation's biggest food aid program, using contingency funds during the government shutdown.
Judges order the Trump administration to use contingency funds for SNAP payments during the shutdown
Two federal judges ruled nearly simultaneously on Friday that President Trump's administration must continue to fund SNAP, using contingency funds during the government shutdown.abc7ny.com
The rulings came a day before the U.S. Department of Agriculture planned to freeze payments to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program because it said it could no longer keep funding it due to the shutdown.
The program serves about 1 in 8 Americans and is a major piece of the nation's social safety net. Word in October that it would be a Nov. 1 casualty of the shutdown sent states, food banks and SNAP recipients scrambling to figure out how to secure food. Some states said they would spend their own funds to keep versions of the program going.
Once again we see laid bare, the supposedly "Pro-Family", Republican Party is more than willing to see families go without food in order to prove how little they really care those same families needing health care. Their values are transactional, they use them when it suits them and then when no longer needed ignore them.
Senate Democrats keep voting against the bill which would restore SNAP benefits.
What actual Law are they not obeying?
- Jun 22, 2020
- 23,178
- 26,374
- 2,288
Why did you capitalize the word “law”?
Because I want to, now run and tell that.
- Jun 22, 2020
- 23,178
- 26,374
- 2,288
Odd that someone would want to appear uneducated, but you do you.
Why would I run anywhere and tell "that"?
Because you are constantly running that DS telling everything else.
- Jun 22, 2020
- 23,178
- 26,374
- 2,288
You post like an imbecile. Try saying something coherent, boy.
- Jun 22, 2020
- 23,178
- 26,374
- 2,288
Maybe Stupidbadbrutha can help you out.
That's because I am talking to an imbecile, fk boy.
Come on Orangecunt.
Seymour Flops
Diamond Member
That's why the Trump Administration is asking for clarification.
This is unprecedented, like so many anti-Trump rulings that keep being flushed by the USSC.
The order is vague. Who exactly is Trump supposed to spend this money on? How will distribution be determined? By need, or by making sure each recipient gets the same amount of the very limited funds? Will that be done by families or by individuals?
All those are executive questions, guided by legislative regulations. So it is understandably confusing when a judge tries to put all that into a brief and vague "restraining order."
- Jun 22, 2020
- 23,178
- 26,374
- 2,288
Talking to yourself again?
Do you find yourself to be as stupid as everyone else who reads your drivel does?
- Jun 22, 2020
- 23,178
- 26,374
- 2,288
Good one, if you like nonsense. Learn to use commas, dipshit.
You wouldn't last a minute against me IRL, whiner.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Veterans Affairs to be part of new presidential task force targeting fraud .- Started by Superbadbrutha
- Replies: 2
-
-
FBI investigation of Joe Kent began before his "resignation"
- Started by Thethingsz
- Replies: 0
-
Guess what? Some nations have agreed to help keep the Strait open- Started by BackAgain
- Replies: 4
