Judge who halted Trump muslim ban caught in HUGE LIE.

[ShootSpeeders]

Just your typical corrupt federal judge who does whatever the illegal alien lobby tells him to do. Judge Robart should be impeached and removed from office for this.

Did The Judges Lie: New Report Finds 72 Terrorists Came From Countries Covered By Trump Ban | Zero Hedge

feb 11 2017 The federal judge who halted President Donald Trump's travel ban was wrong in stating that no one from the seven countries targeted in Trump's order has been arrested for extremism in the United States since the 2001 terrorist attacks. In fact, as a new report finds, 72 individuals from the seven 'mostly Muslim countries' covered by President Trump's "extreme vetting" executive order have been convicted of terrorism since 9/11.

As AP first reported, during a hearing in Seattle last week, Judge Robart asked a Justice Department lawyer how many arrests of foreign nationals from the countries have occurred since 9/11. When the lawyer said she didn't know, Robart answered his own question:

"Let me tell, you, the answer to that is none, as best I can tell. You're here arguing on behalf of someone that says we have to protect the United States from these individuals coming from these countries and there's no support for that."

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Is there one honest judge in america?

 

[Desperado]

Is there one honest judge in america?

Not anymore. Money is their God as well as their guide.

 

[Timmy]

Hey stupid . It's the attorneys who argue the cases who provide evidence . Not the judge .

So take your fake news sight elsewhere .

 

[saveliberty]

Hey stupid . It's the attorneys who argue the cases who provide evidence . Not the judge .

So take your fake news sight elsewhere .

So the judge accepted something as fact that was not and repeated it along with used it as a basis for his decision. How is that better?

 

[Rob37]

Hey stupid . It's the attorneys who argue the cases who provide evidence . Not the judge .

So take your fake news sight elsewhere .

Sounds like a lie to me. Sounds like the Judge asserted the number, not the lawyers.

Of course, giving the judge the benefit of the doubt, it may not be a lie. It may have just been a mistake if fact.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Hey stupid . It's the attorneys who argue the cases who provide evidence . Not the judge .

So take your fake news sight elsewhere .

Yep.

Besides, according to the trumpkins, under the Twitler regime, lies are the new truth.

 

[Timmy]

Hey stupid . It's the attorneys who argue the cases who provide evidence . Not the judge .

So take your fake news sight elsewhere .

So the judge accepted something as fact that was not and repeated it along with used it as a basis for his decision. How is that better?

This thread takes the link to some hack website as "fact"!

Let's say it's true . Then it's further proof that trumps lawyers were unprepared idiots .

 

[Freewill]

Hey stupid . It's the attorneys who argue the cases who provide evidence . Not the judge .

So take your fake news sight elsewhere .

You really ought to read the articles and become even a little educated before placing your foot into your mouth:

As AP first reported, during a hearing in Seattle last week, Judge Robartasked a Justice Department lawyer how many arrests of foreign nationals from the countries have occurred since 9/11. When the lawyer said she didn't know, Robart answered his own question:

"Let me tell, you, the answer to that is none, as best I can tell. You're here arguing on behalf of someone that says we have to protect the United States from these individuals coming from these countries and there's no support for that."

So as you can plainly see and wantonly ignore, it was the JUDGE who provided that information.

Oh, since you like to attack the source, here is the AP reporting the very EXACT thing.

AP FACT CHECK: No arrests from 7 nations in travel ban? Nope

 

[ColonelAngus]

Hey stupid . It's the attorneys who argue the cases who provide evidence . Not the judge .

So take your fake news sight elsewhere .

Hey stupid, The judge made his own conclusion without evidence.

The judge said that NOT ONE TERRORISM ARREST HAD BEEN MADE FROM IMMIGRANTS FROM THOSE COUNTRIES.

He was wrong.

Where did the judge get his information?

You're a fucking dipshit if you think that in Federal Appeals court regarding Constitutionality of an executive EO, the judge is limited to ONLY what attorneys TELL THEM. It's not criminal court, jackass.

 

[Rob37]

Hey stupid . It's the attorneys who argue the cases who provide evidence . Not the judge .

So take your fake news sight elsewhere .

So the judge accepted something as fact that was not and repeated it along with used it as a basis for his decision. How is that better?

This thread takes the link to some hack website as "fact"!

Let's say it's true . Then it's further proof that trumps lawyers were unprepared idiots .

It pains me to agree with Timmy on anything since he clearly is a degenerate piece of shit, but from the audio I heard of the arguments made to the 9th Circuit, the gov lawyer did a shit-sorry job in stating the law and arguing it. The 9th Cir. Judges are political hacks. It should be easy for a seasoned lawyer to run circles around their questions and hypotheticals.

 

[danielpalos]

Just your typical corrupt federal judge who does whatever the illegal alien lobby tells him to do. Judge Robart should be impeached and removed from office for this.

Did The Judges Lie: New Report Finds 72 Terrorists Came From Countries Covered By Trump Ban | Zero Hedge

feb 11 2017 The federal judge who halted President Donald Trump's travel ban was wrong in stating that no one from the seven countries targeted in Trump's order has been arrested for extremism in the United States since the 2001 terrorist attacks. In fact, as a new report finds, 72 individuals from the seven 'mostly Muslim countries' covered by President Trump's "extreme vetting" executive order have been convicted of terrorism since 9/11.

As AP first reported, during a hearing in Seattle last week, Judge Robart asked a Justice Department lawyer how many arrests of foreign nationals from the countries have occurred since 9/11. When the lawyer said she didn't know, Robart answered his own question:

"Let me tell, you, the answer to that is none, as best I can tell. You're here arguing on behalf of someone that says we have to protect the United States from these individuals coming from these countries and there's no support for that."

23 percent of Muslim Americans involved with extremist plots since Sept. 11 had family backgrounds from the seven countries.

Does that mean, that 77 percent came from countries not on that extreme vetting list?

Less than one quarter compared to "three quarters"; it gives the "perception" of conflicts of interest.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Judges ONLY know what attorneys tell them....according to Timmy.

Funny, the judge asked the WASHINGTON attorney how many Muslims WORLDWIDE are affected by the ban.

The attorney replied, "I haven't done the math."

The judge replied, 'Well, I have, and it's less than 13%".

According to snowflake DIPSHIT Timmy, the judge should not have any knowledge of anything outside of what the attorneys tell them, so the judge should not gave done this math on his own.

Jesus Christ, where do you idiots come up with this shit?

 

[saveliberty]

Interesting that the countries listed were on Obama's list with no outrage. Trump uses the same list to actually make the US safer and liberals along with this judge throw a fit.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Who were the govt lawyers and what is their background.

 

[saveliberty]

This thread takes the link to some hack website as "fact"!

Let's say it's true . Then it's further proof that trumps lawyers were unprepared idiots .

I don't think Trump understood the impact activist judges have. This was a good thing, as you can bet he will pick Supreme Court Justices who will not do this ever. The clowns of Ninth District will be in trouble soon enough.

 

[Timmy]

Judges ONLY know what attorneys tell them....according to Timmy.

Funny, the judge asked the WASHINGTON attorney how many Muslims WORLDWIDE are affected by the ban.

The attorney replied, "I haven't done the math."

The judge replied, 'Well, I have, and it's less than 13%".

According to snowflake DIPSHIT Timmy, the judge should not have any knowledge of anything outside of what the attorneys tell them, so the judge should not gave done this math on his own.

Jesus Christ, where do you idiots come up with this shit?

Hey jackass . They read the briefs before they have the hearing . So they take what they are given. He probably "did the math" from an argument that was made . Probably by the trump side since they are claiming it's not a Muslim ban.

 

[Timmy]

This thread takes the link to some hack website as "fact"!

Let's say it's true . Then it's further proof that trumps lawyers were unprepared idiots .

I don't think Trump understood the impact activist judges have. This was a good thing, as you can bet he will pick Supreme Court Justices who will not do this ever. The clowns of Ninth District will be in trouble soon enough.

You contradict yourself. Are fed judges activists or not?

 

[miketx]

Hey stupid . It's the attorneys who argue the cases who provide evidence . Not the judge .

So take your fake news sight elsewhere .

So the judge accepted something as fact that was not and repeated it along with used it as a basis for his decision. How is that better?

Timmies all for criminals coming in.

 

[Timmy]

Interesting that the countries listed were on Obama's list with no outrage. Trump uses the same list to actually make the US safer and liberals along with this judge throw a fit.

Well they ain't exactly our best buddies on that list . That's more on the governments and not the people .

My question, why did Trunp use that list and not just make his own?