And P.S. Have ANY of the Biden Family members who got a share of the $10 million bribery money funneled through shell companies gotten on TV and explained what work they did for that share of the money?
Judge Warns "Mr. Trump" Not Commit Any Offenses Or Have Release Revoked
- Thread starter skews13
- Start date
wamose
Diamond Member
I'd love to hear Trump's private conversations about the woman named Moxila Upadhyaya telling him to be a good boy. I'm sure it would be hilariously insensitive.
What kind of weird name is that? Let me guess. Another leftist woman of color out to get Trump.
Emily Post disagrees with you
Either way is acceptable. Hu
- Banned
- #265
If look at the data on illegal immigration, it was Biden and the Dems / Marxists who broke a system thus facilitating and encouraging the flood of illegals.
Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #266
- Banned
- #267
I’m hoping Congress will step up if Sloppy Joe tries to further enrich the Chinese by draining what is left of the Strategic Reserves.
Energy Sec Had Secret Conversation With CCP Official Before SPR Release
And there's a Hunter Biden connection - because of course there is.
redstate.com
Borillar
Platinum Member
Why? Obama isn’t on trial, fat Donny is.
0311
Diamond Member
DOJ Prosecutors Request Protective Order After Trump Arraignment, Citing Social Media Threats.
thehill.com
Editor’s Note: This story has been updated to reflect that the strict order preventing the former president from mentioning details and evidence from the case against him in public is a protective order.
Justice Department Special counsel Jack Smith appealed to the federal judge overseeing former President Trump’s election fraud case Friday evening to issue a protective order for evidence, citing social media threats.
"IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!” the former president posted earlier on Truth Social — a move which has already drawn criticism with a former spokesperson for Trump calling it “chilling” and “witness intimidation.”
Smith argued that Trump’s case needs a strict order preventing Trump from mentioning details from discovery documents and evidence in public.
DOJ prosecutors request protective order after Trump arraignment, citing social media threats
Editor’s Note: This story has been updated to reflect that the strict order preventing the former president from mentioning details and evidence from the case against him in public is a prote…
thehill.com
Editor’s Note: This story has been updated to reflect that the strict order preventing the former president from mentioning details and evidence from the case against him in public is a protective order.
Justice Department Special counsel Jack Smith appealed to the federal judge overseeing former President Trump’s election fraud case Friday evening to issue a protective order for evidence, citing social media threats.
"IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!” the former president posted earlier on Truth Social — a move which has already drawn criticism with a former spokesperson for Trump calling it “chilling” and “witness intimidation.”
Smith argued that Trump’s case needs a strict order preventing Trump from mentioning details from discovery documents and evidence in public.
Cougarbear
Gold Member
- Jan 29, 2022
- 12,216
- 5,899
- 208
Why should they? He’s innocent. So, life as usual. Biden will have Obama there trying to look innocent when it’s his turn.
tahuyaman
Platinum Member
- Aug 21, 2012
- 8,441
- 4,928
- 928
Why would they attend?
0311
Diamond Member
Showing support for a family member.
tahuyaman
Platinum Member
- Aug 21, 2012
- 8,441
- 4,928
- 928
That would just create a media feeding frenzy. None of them want that.
How do you disagree with a question which draws no conclusion?
I knew he couldn't keep his mouth shut. Guess he wants to go into protective custody.DOJ Prosecutors Request Protective Order After Trump Arraignment, Citing Social Media Threats.
DOJ prosecutors request protective order after Trump arraignment, citing social media threats
Editor’s Note: This story has been updated to reflect that the strict order preventing the former president from mentioning details and evidence from the case against him in public is a prote…
Editor’s Note: This story has been updated to reflect that the strict order preventing the former president from mentioning details and evidence from the case against him in public is a protective order.
Justice Department Special counsel Jack Smith appealed to the federal judge overseeing former President Trump’s election fraud case Friday evening to issue a protective order for evidence, citing social media threats.
"IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!” the former president posted earlier on Truth Social — a move which has already drawn criticism with a former spokesperson for Trump calling it “chilling” and “witness intimidation.”
Smith argued that Trump’s case needs a strict order preventing Trump from mentioning details from discovery documents and evidence in public.
tahuyaman
Platinum Member
- Aug 21, 2012
- 8,441
- 4,928
- 928
It’s not protective custody you nit-wit.
They did that by appearing on TV interviews to defend him against the weaponized DOJ.
No matter what it's called It's protecting him from himself.
0311
Diamond Member
Maybe he thinks the judge was just making noise. She wasn't.
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 65,087
- 59,277
- 3,600
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Granting Illegal Aliens a Pre Deportation Hearing TRANSGRESSES Upon the Constitution's Preamble- Started by Contumacious
- Replies: 1
-
-
Zone1 Pope LeoXIV's Inauguration MassToday- Started by OhPleaseJustQuit
- Replies: 0
-
The ridiculous background of pallyweid "gaza genocide[sic]" wikipedia page.- Started by Sayaras
- Replies: 1
-
Inside China's Multi Million Dollar Tofu Buildings, the Horrifying Scenes Unfold- Started by Mac-7
- Replies: 5
