Judge sets Trump's sentencing in hush money case for Jan. 10, but signals no jail time

You overestimate the size.of your cult.
You underestimate the annoyance the country has with woke sycophants like you and your fellow libs

IMG_3261.webp
 
The American people have supported all of it.

The election of Trump is separate from the public supporting the trials.

What you can say is that it is sad the public would elect a felon over Biden.
You’re incorrect

This will backfire and many a business will continue to leave NY.
 
The orange subhuman turd will still enter office as the fist POTUS in history who's a convicted felon. :banana:

And of course the orange subhuman criminal scumbag felon is ranting & raving about it.

Making MAGA idiots proud.

No one cares expect about 10% of lost liberals.

I mean no one
 
Trump went to great lengths to broadcast his lack of respect for biased judges like Juan Merchon and biased DA's like Alvin Bragg, Tish James, Jack Smith and Fahni Willis.
Translation; successful prosecutions against trump make grand juries, juries, DA's, and judges biased. Just as election losses for trump make elections full of voter fraud.

See a pattern?
 
Translation; successful prosecutions against trump make grand juries, juries, DA's, and judges biased. Just as election losses for trump make elections full of voter fraud.

See a pattern?
Pattern is you putting those who disagree with you on ignore. Trump has broken you
 
ALAN DERSHOWITZ reveals the exact courtroom moment he knew Trump was doomed to a guilty verdict

When the evidence was introduced?
 
DonGlock26

The opinion of two lawyers. There exist opposing opinions by other lawyers and former prosecutors, both state and federal. This being a state case I'll go with the lawyers who know and have practiced in state courts. Specifically New York State courts. And even there one could find opposing opinions.

The problem with you and people like you here is that you all keep putting forth opinions as self-evident, undeniable facts.
 
DonGlock26

The opinion of two lawyers. There exist opposing opinions by other lawyers and former prosecutors, both state and federal. This being a state case I'll go with the lawyers who know and have practiced in state courts. Specifically New York State courts. And even there one could find opposing opinions.

The problem with you and people like you here is that you all keep putting forth opinions as self-evident, undeniable facts.
This will be appealed and overturned.
 
This will be appealed and overturned.
Of course it will be appealed. We all know how often Trump's arguments before courts rarely hold any water. The idea that an online TROLL like you posts that they actually know with conviction[pun], how something unknown will turn out, is a hilarious joy when entering an afternoon view of online comedy.
 
Of course it will be appealed. We all know how often Trump's arguments before courts rarely hold any water. The idea that an online TROLL like you posts that they actually know with conviction[pun], how something unknown will turn out, is a hilarious joy when entering an afternoon view of online comedy.
Want to bet? Name your price. How about life? That’s how confident I am.
 
DonGlock26

The opinion of two lawyers. There exist opposing opinions by other lawyers and former prosecutors, both state and federal. This being a state case I'll go with the lawyers who know and have practiced in state courts. Specifically New York State courts. And even there one could find opposing opinions.

The problem with you and people like you here is that you all keep putting forth opinions as self-evident, undeniable facts.

I believe they are both famous law professors.
 
I believe they are both famous law professors.
Being famous doesn't make one great. I know Trump believes that to be so, but he also believes he is a genius. And there exist accomplished law professors that have disagreed with both men.

You are replying to:
The opinion of two lawyers. There exist opposing opinions by other lawyers and former prosecutors, both state and federal. This being a state case I'll go with the lawyers who know and have practiced in state courts. Specifically New York State courts. And even there one could find opposing opinions.

The problem with you and people like you here is that you all keep putting forth opinions as self-evident, undeniable facts
.

How do you believe your reply is actually to what you are responding to?
 
Being famous doesn't make one great. I know Trump believes that to be so, but he also believes he is a genius. And there exist accomplished law professors that have disagreed with both men.

You are replying to:
The opinion of two lawyers. There exist opposing opinions by other lawyers and former prosecutors, both state and federal. This being a state case I'll go with the lawyers who know and have practiced in state courts. Specifically New York State courts. And even there one could find opposing opinions.

The problem with you and people like you here is that you all keep putting forth opinions as self-evident, undeniable facts
.

How do you believe your reply is actually to what you are responding to?

You can ignore their opinions, if you wish.
 
It doesn't matter, it's an illegitimate sham case run by Liars. Trump is your president and you are just a disgruntled little piece of shit.
Heil Shitler! isn’t my president.

I’m not in a cult.
 
Back
Top Bottom