Judge rules Trump policy to deport students over pro-Palestinian views is unconstitutional

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
82,044
Reaction score
45,742
Points
2,605
Location
In a Republic, actually
‘A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration’s policy to detain and deport foreign scholars over their pro-Palestinian views violates the US constitution and was designed to “intentionally” chill free speech rights.

The case was brought by the national American Association of University Professors (AAUP); its Harvard, Rutgers and New York University chapters; and the Middle East Studies Association (Mesa), following the arrest and detention of several noncitizen students and scholars who have spoken out on Palestinian rights.

In a 161-page ruling issued on Tuesday, the judge, William G Young, called the case “perhaps the most important ever to fall within the jurisdiction of this district court”.

“This case … squarely presents the issue whether noncitizens lawfully present here in United States actually have the same free speech rights as the rest of us,” Young wrote in the ruling. “The court answers this constitutional question unequivocally ‘yes, they do’.”’


The First Amendment protects the right of free speech of all persons in the United States, no matter how unpopular that speech might be.
 
The genocidal maniac neo-nazi Palestinians are a very important part of the Democrat Party's voter base.
 
‘A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration’s policy to detain and deport foreign scholars over their pro-Palestinian views violates the US constitution and was designed to “intentionally” chill free speech rights.

The case was brought by the national American Association of University Professors (AAUP); its Harvard, Rutgers and New York University chapters; and the Middle East Studies Association (Mesa), following the arrest and detention of several noncitizen students and scholars who have spoken out on Palestinian rights.

In a 161-page ruling issued on Tuesday, the judge, William G Young, called the case “perhaps the most important ever to fall within the jurisdiction of this district court”.

“This case … squarely presents the issue whether noncitizens lawfully present here in United States actually have the same free speech rights as the rest of us,” Young wrote in the ruling. “The court answers this constitutional question unequivocally ‘yes, they do’.”’


The First Amendment protects the right of free speech of all persons in the United States, no matter how unpopular that speech might be.
If the ruling came from a district court judge then the ruling is automatically null & void.
 
It’s not their view
It IS their actions
 
Last edited:
‘A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration’s policy to detain and deport foreign scholars over their pro-Palestinian views violates the US constitution and was designed to “intentionally” chill free speech rights.

The case was brought by the national American Association of University Professors (AAUP); its Harvard, Rutgers and New York University chapters; and the Middle East Studies Association (Mesa), following the arrest and detention of several noncitizen students and scholars who have spoken out on Palestinian rights.

In a 161-page ruling issued on Tuesday, the judge, William G Young, called the case “perhaps the most important ever to fall within the jurisdiction of this district court”.

“This case … squarely presents the issue whether noncitizens lawfully present here in United States actually have the same free speech rights as the rest of us,” Young wrote in the ruling. “The court answers this constitutional question unequivocally ‘yes, they do’.”’


The First Amendment protects the right of free speech of all persons in the United States, no matter how unpopular that speech might be.
Fine. Determine him to be a foreign terrorist and give him the Venezuelan drug boat treatment.

And the traitor judge too.
 
‘A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration’s policy to detain and deport foreign scholars over their pro-Palestinian views violates the US constitution and was designed to “intentionally” chill free speech rights.

The case was brought by the national American Association of University Professors (AAUP); its Harvard, Rutgers and New York University chapters; and the Middle East Studies Association (Mesa), following the arrest and detention of several noncitizen students and scholars who have spoken out on Palestinian rights.

In a 161-page ruling issued on Tuesday, the judge, William G Young, called the case “perhaps the most important ever to fall within the jurisdiction of this district court”.

“This case … squarely presents the issue whether noncitizens lawfully present here in United States actually have the same free speech rights as the rest of us,” Young wrote in the ruling. “The court answers this constitutional question unequivocally ‘yes, they do’.”’


The First Amendment protects the right of free speech of all persons in the United States, no matter how unpopular that speech might be.
The judge has no jurisdiction in this case. Aliens do not have the same protections as citizens
 
Students do not get deported for "pro-Palestinian" views. They get deported for advocating violence against Jewish students and genocide against Israel.

But these Democrat judges need to keep showing their true colors so that normal Americans are reminded why we never need another Democratic Party president, ever - no matter how much of a "moderate" they pretend to be.
 
Noem has made this an issue, that somehow


"supporting the cause of Zionist Fascism" is "necessary" to being " a good American."


The real truth is 180 degrees in the opposite direction. Noem is another one who should be out the door...
 
They get deported for advocating violence against Jewish students and genocide against Israel.


That standard is fine, but it is not the one Kristi uses. That Georgetown professor did not advocate violence. Kristi went after him because he wasn't in compliance with her definition, that you must support Zionist Fascism.
 
That standard is fine, but it is not the one Kristi uses. That Georgetown professor did not advocate violence. Kristi went after him because he wasn't in compliance with her definition, that you must support Zionist Fascism.
I'd love to see any evidence of that claim.
 
Masshole judge.



That's the "Spanberger Republican" right there, supporting Zionist Fascism is mandatory "commanded by GAWD" stuff, including voting as a "conservative" for Spanberger...
 
The First Amendment protects the right of free speech of all persons in the United States, no matter how unpopular that speech might be.
Gee......

The court system works.

Wasn't the case under Biden.

Then he appoints a freaking kangaroo to the SCOTUS.
 
15th post
I'd love to see any evidence of that claim.




According to multiple recent reports, a federal judge has ruled that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Secretary of State Marco Rubio unconstitutionally targeted a Georgetown professor and other non-citizens for deportation due to their pro-Palestinian speech







And that is what it is. Zionist Fascism supporters DO NOT SUPPORT

Freedom of speech
Freedom of thought
being asked to define the word CONSERVATIVE because THEY HAVE NO ******* CLUE WHAT IT MEANS
 


According to multiple recent reports, a federal judge has ruled that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Secretary of State Marco Rubio unconstitutionally targeted a Georgetown professor and other non-citizens for deportation due to their pro-Palestinian speech







And that is what it is. Zionist Fascism supporters DO NOT SUPPORT

Freedom of speech
Freedom of thought
being asked to define the word CONSERVATIVE because THEY HAVE NO ******* CLUE WHAT IT MEANS
That is not evidence of Kristi going after a professor because he did not support Zionism.

That is absurd.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom