Judge orders Trump administration to admit roughly 12,000 refugees

EvilEyeFleegle

Dogpatch USA
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
18,447
Reaction score
11,401
Points
1,280
Location
Twin Falls Idaho
Yet another court blocking yet another Trump order no doubt leading to yet another appeal.
...and the beat goes on~


A judge on Monday ordered the Trump administration to admit some 12,000 refugees into the United States under a court order partially blocking the president’s efforts to suspend the nation’s refugee admissions program.

The order from U.S. District Judge Jamal Whitehead followed arguments from the Justice Department and refugee resettlement agencies over how to interpret a federal appeals court ruling that significantly narrowed an earlier decision from Whitehead.

During a hearing last week, the administration said it should only have to process 160 refugees into the country and that it would likely appeal any order requiring it to admit thousands. But the judge dismissed the government’s analysis, saying it required “not just reading between the lines” of the 9th Circuit’s ruling, “but hallucinating new text that simply is not there.”


“This Court will not entertain the Government’s result-oriented rewriting of a judicial order that clearly says what it says,” Whitehead wrote Monday. “The Government is free, of course, to seek further clarification from the Ninth Circuit. But the Government is not free to disobey statutory and constitutional law — and the direct orders of this Court and the Ninth Circuit — while it seeks such clarification.”
Whitehead ordered the administration within the next seven days to instruct agency offices and staff, including U.S. embassies, to resume processing the cases of refugees who are protected by the court order. He also told the government to immediately take steps to facilitate admission to the U.S. for those refugees whose clearances, including medical and security authorizations, have not yet lapsed.
 
But the Government is not free to disobey statutory and constitutional law
Trump is a criminal and convicted felon, he has contempt for the law and Constitution, and he'll illegally defy both.

Trump’s immigration agenda is motivated by racism, bigotry, and hate.
 
Trump is a criminal and convicted felon, he has contempt for the law and Constitution, and he'll illegally defy both.

Trump’s immigration agenda is motivated by racism, bigotry, and hate.
jones what about your agenda of bigotry and hate?...should i wait for your spokes person to answer?...
 
Biden appointed Seattle district court judge?

What are there snow mexicans trying to get in?

"judge" Jamal can **** right off and stay in his lane.

300px-Jamal_Whitehead.jpg


Congress needs to put these district court judges back in their lane.
 
U.S. District Judge Jamal Whitehead
Not hard to guess why he was picked for the job.

From your own link:

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals largely put Whitehead’s decision on hold in March, finding that the administration was likely to win the case given the president’s broad authority to determine who is allowed to enter the country.

If the 9th Circuitd did not add "DUH!" that was very kind of them.


But the appeals court also said the government should continue processing those who had already been approved for travel to the U.S., some of whom had upended their lives abroad by selling property or quitting their jobs. Such people had relied on promises made by the federal government that they would be admitted, the court found.

If they had property and jobs, WTF were they refugees from?

"Relied on promises that they would be admitted?" Is the judge trying to make Democratic promises to foreigners into contract law?
 
Last edited:
Not hard to guess why he was picked for the job.

From your own link:

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals largely put Whitehead’s decision on hold in March, finding that the administration was likely to win the case given the president’s broad authority to determine who is allowed to enter the country.

If the 9th Circuitd did not add "DUH!" that was very kind of them.


But the appeals court also said the government should continue processing those who had already been approved for travel to the U.S., some of whom had upended their lives abroad by selling property or quitting their jobs. Such people had relied on promises made by the federal government that they would be admitted, the court found.

If they had property and jobs, WTF were they refugees from?

"Relied on promises that they would be admitted?" Is the judge trying to make Democratic promises to foreigners into contract law?
Promises made by the US government.
The party is irrelevant...to those who accepted those promises in good faith.
I understand you simply don't understand that.
The judge is telling the US that they must keep their word..a concept foreign to Trump and his ilk~
 
Promises made by the US government.
The party is irrelevant...to those who accepted those promises in good faith.
I understand you simply don't understand that.
The judge is telling the US that they must keep their word..a concept foreign to Trump and his ilk~
Then why did even the ultra liberal 9th circuit say Trump will likely win this case?
 
Promises made by the US government.
You mean like all of the promises made to the American Indians? :lmao:

The judge is telling the US that they must keep their word.
That judge is in no position to dictate U.S. policy. We are simply not interested in those people, mark my words, they will never enter. There is nothing about accepting them into this country that is beneficial to the United States.

Maybe after Trump kicks out 24,000 MS13 bums, he might consider taking in some of those people. The USA is no longer the world's rescue wagon and life support. Americans are tired of putting everyone else ahead of our own interests.
 
Maybe after Trump kicks out 24,000 MS13 bums, he might consider taking in some of those people. The USA is no longer the world's rescue wagon and life support. Americans are tired of putting everyone else ahead of our own interests.
That may be the worst legacy of the Biden administration for would-be immigrants. His pretense of giving "assylum" to anyone who mouthed the words will mean that assylum has to be tightened up, and genuinely imperriled people will not be able to escape their persecutors.
 
15th post
/——/ Hey, Slow Brain, here’s your precious TdA on a stroll through Times Square.

All I can say is that as usual, I see a small group of juvenile gang thugs and an entire block full of adults all standing around with their dicks in their hands doing nothing.

Had some of those people lifted a finger, those kids would all be in jail. New Yorkers get what they deserve.
 
You can't change law, after the fact.

Under the law (E/O), people were given this permission to enter as asylum seeker refugees, if they followed the parameters and guidelines the govt gave them...medical check up, shots, papers, reason for asylum met etc etc etc...

These people were following the process and applied prior to Trump writing a new E/O CHANGING the law.

Therefore they are "grandfathered" so to say, because they entered the parole/refugee asylum program when it was law, and before Trump changed the law.

It's really pretty simple, and normal, common sense practice....imo.
 
Last edited:
All I can say is that as usual, I see a small group of juvenile gang thugs and an entire block full of adults all standing around with their dicks in their hands doing nothing.

Had some of those people lifted a finger, those kids would all be in jail. New Yorkers get what they deserve.
/----/ Easier said than done. Not everyone is physically fit and trained to get into a brawl.
 
Back
Top Bottom