Judge in Hunter Biden's tax case accepts pardon despite calling it 'unconstitutional'

[struth]

There was a chance of Nixon facing charges. He was likely going to be impeached. He resigned on the agreement that Ford would Pardon him.

There was no agreement Ford would issue a pardon

 

[NetJedi]

Why? Trump was convicted of an unspecified felony according to the airheads in NY!

Uh-huh, how does that negate the fact that pardoning someone for unspecified crimes is perversion of the original intent of Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of The Constitution?

Just because the Democrats took a dump on the scales of justice once, doesn't mean we have to ignore it every time they do it in the future.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Uh-huh, how does that negate the fact that pardoning someone for unspecified crimes is perversion of the original intent of Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of The Constitution?

Just because the Democrats took a dump on the scales of justice once, doesn't mean we have to ignore it every time they do it in the future.

How do you know what the original intent was? Were you there? Is it addressed in the Federalist Papers? How do you know?

 

[NetJedi]

How do you know what the original intent was? Were you there? Is it addressed in the Federalist Papers? How do you know?

Federalist 74.

 

[jc456]

Judge in Hunter Biden's tax case accepts pardon despite calling it 'unconstitutional'

Two days after President Joe Biden issued a blanket pardon to his son Hunter Biden, the federal judge overseeing the younger Biden's tax charges in California slammed the president's characterization of the case as an improper attempt to "rewrite history." U.S. Judge Mark Scarsi -- who was...

www.yahoo.com

Two days after President Joe Biden issued a blanket pardon to his son Hunter Biden, the federal judge overseeing the younger Biden's tax charges in California slammed the president's characterization of the case as an improper attempt to "rewrite history."

U.S. Judge Mark Scarsi -- who was appointed by Donald Trump -- took aim at President Biden's suggestion that "no reasonable person" would find the charging decisions against his son fair, noting that the "president's own attorney general and Department of Justice" oversaw the case.

"In the President's estimation," Scarsi continued, "this legion of federal civil servants, the undersigned included, are unreasonable people."

"The Constitution provides the President with broad authority to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States … but nowhere does the Constitution give the President the authority to rewrite history," Scarsi said.

To be a democrat is to trample the Constitution and American voter with impunity

Nothing they do is ever wrong, or against the law, or if it is, they pardon each other.

Cult defined to a T

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Federalist 74.

The intent of the pardon was mentioned regarding political purposes, but not relating to this topic in regards to limitations.

So what else have you got?

 

[postman]

Judge in Hunter Biden's tax case accepts pardon despite calling it 'unconstitutional'

Two days after President Joe Biden issued a blanket pardon to his son Hunter Biden, the federal judge overseeing the younger Biden's tax charges in California slammed the president's characterization of the case as an improper attempt to "rewrite history." U.S. Judge Mark Scarsi -- who was...

www.yahoo.com

Two days after President Joe Biden issued a blanket pardon to his son Hunter Biden, the federal judge overseeing the younger Biden's tax charges in California slammed the president's characterization of the case as an improper attempt to "rewrite history."

U.S. Judge Mark Scarsi -- who was appointed by Donald Trump -- took aim at President Biden's suggestion that "no reasonable person" would find the charging decisions against his son fair, noting that the "president's own attorney general and Department of Justice" oversaw the case.

You forget. It was a Trump appointed US Attorney that went after Hunter Biden, Not the Biden DOJ.
And while Biden's DOJ had oversight of the case, Garland took a total hands off approach. Letting the Trump picked US Attorney do whatever he wanted.

And we saw how he abused his power by charging someone who had already paid his taxes in full.

 

[postman]

Tell it to the judge half wit

Now you and your minions will be forced to destroy the reputation of the judge.

If the judge thinks a presidential pardon is unconstitutional, he didn't bother to read the constitution, and is unqualified for his position.

 

[postman]

Tell it to the judge half wit

Now you and your minions will be forced to destroy the reputation of the judge.

Actually the judge needs to read the latest decision from the US Supreme Court.
The one that grants absolute immunity for all official presidential acts.

Which effectively said that a president can use his power, or even abuse his power, and never worry about criminal prosecution.

And where there is no punishment, there is no crime.

 

[struth]

You forget. It was a Trump appointed US Attorney that went after Hunter Biden, Not the Biden DOJ.
And while Biden's DOJ had oversight of the case, Garland took a total hands off approach. Letting the Trump picked US Attorney do whatever he wanted.

And we saw how he abused his power by charging someone who had already paid his taxes in full.

hahah he was reappoined by Xiden....and worked for Xiden's DOJ. Xiden could of fired him at any time. And he didn't even get the Special Prosecutor title, until after the unprecedented sweet heart deal was rejected by the Court.


hahaha, you dembots....are just silly.

 

[struth]

Actually the judge needs to read the latest decision from the US Supreme Court.
The one that grants absolute immunity for all official presidential acts.

Which effectively said that a president can use his power, or even abuse his power, and never worry about criminal prosecution.

And where there is no punishment, there is no crime.

no it didn't....abusing your power is NOT acting with in your official capacity you dumb shit.

 

[postman]

no it didn't....abusing your power is NOT acting with in your official capacity you dumb shit.

Actually abusing your power is acting within your official capacity.

It's an official presidential act. It's a power enumerated in the constitution. It's just what the supreme court said the president has absolute immunity from prosecution.

Justices rule Trump has some immunity from prosecution - SCOTUSblog

This article was updated on July 1 at 3:32 p.m. In a historic decision, a divided Supreme Court on Monday ruled that former presidents can never be prosecuted for actions relating to the core powers of their office, and that there is at least a presumption that they have immunity for their offici

www.scotusblog.com

In a historic decision, a divided Supreme Court on Monday ruled that former presidents can never be prosecuted for actions relating to the core powers of their office, and that there is at least a presumption that they have immunity for their official acts more broadly.

As an initial matter, Roberts explained in his 43-page ruling, presidents have absolute immunity for their official acts when those acts relate to the core powers granted to them by the Constitution – for example, the power to issue pardons, veto legislation, recognize ambassadors, and make appointments.

 

[Lesh]

Pardons are not unconstitutional, dipshit.

And if the judge does not know that, he should be unbenched promptly.

“Trump appointed judge..”

 

[struth]

Actually abusing your power is acting within your official capacity.

It's an official presidential act. It's a power enumerated in the constitution. It's just what the supreme court said the president has absolute immunity from prosecution.

Justices rule Trump has some immunity from prosecution - SCOTUSblog

This article was updated on July 1 at 3:32 p.m. In a historic decision, a divided Supreme Court on Monday ruled that former presidents can never be prosecuted for actions relating to the core powers of their office, and that there is at least a presumption that they have immunity for their offici

www.scotusblog.com

In a historic decision, a divided Supreme Court on Monday ruled that former presidents can never be prosecuted for actions relating to the core powers of their office, and that there is at least a presumption that they have immunity for their official acts more broadly.

As an initial matter, Roberts explained in his 43-page ruling, presidents have absolute immunity for their official acts when those acts relate to the core powers granted to them by the Constitution – for example, the power to issue pardons, veto legislation, recognize ambassadors, and make appointments.

The Court didn't say a President has absolute immunity, where in the Constitution is abusing your office an enumerated power? hahah

seriously, why are you all so stupid?

 

[berg80]

Judge in Hunter Biden's tax case accepts pardon despite calling it 'unconstitutional'

Two days after President Joe Biden issued a blanket pardon to his son Hunter Biden, the federal judge overseeing the younger Biden's tax charges in California slammed the president's characterization of the case as an improper attempt to "rewrite history." U.S. Judge Mark Scarsi -- who was...

www.yahoo.com

Two days after President Joe Biden issued a blanket pardon to his son Hunter Biden, the federal judge overseeing the younger Biden's tax charges in California slammed the president's characterization of the case as an improper attempt to "rewrite history."

U.S. Judge Mark Scarsi -- who was appointed by Donald Trump -- took aim at President Biden's suggestion that "no reasonable person" would find the charging decisions against his son fair, noting that the "president's own attorney general and Department of Justice" oversaw the case.

"In the President's estimation," Scarsi continued, "this legion of federal civil servants, the undersigned included, are unreasonable people."

"The Constitution provides the President with broad authority to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States … but nowhere does the Constitution give the President the authority to rewrite history," Scarsi said.

To be a democrat is to trample the Constitution and American voter with impunity

Nothing they do is ever wrong, or against the law, or if it is, they pardon each other.

U.S. Judge Mark Scarsi -- who was appointed by Donald Trump

Enough said. No doubt Mark will be a willing participant in trump's attempt to corrupt our system of justice.

 

[struth]

U.S. Judge Mark Scarsi -- who was appointed by Donald Trump

Enough said. No doubt Mark will be a willing participant in trump's attempt to corrupt our system of justice.

One of the first things the National Socialist did in Germany was undermine their judicial system. I am not at all surprised to see the Demafacsit brownshirts do the same here

 

[Blisterfinger]

Cultists believe all sorts of weird shit

You are in a cult of the belief that we are in a cult LOL

 

[Lesh]

One of the first things the National Socialist did in Germany was undermine their judicial system. I am not at all surprised to see the Demafacsit brownshirts do the same here

That’s exactly what these Trump appointed judges and Justices are doing

 

[struth]

That’s exactly what these Trump appointed judges and Justices are doing

haha no, they were appointed and confirmed to sit in the US Judicial system.

They aren't firebombing Court houses...that's dembot brownshirts.

 

[Lesh]

haha no, they were appointed and confirmed to sit in the US Judicial system.

They aren't firebombing Court houses...that's dembot brownshirts.

lol.

You lost track of the post you made what… 19 minutes ago?