Judge denies releasing the Epstein clint list to the public

What does that have to do with Trump? Did he pay them off?
I don't know if he even diddled anyone. But if he did and paid her off that deal should probably stay sealed.
I have no clue what deals Epstein made, but the courts will let us know what we get to know.
Democrats were in coverup mode when Biden let 320,000 kids get sex trafficked.
Same with Biden showering (and diddling?) Ashley.
 

As I suspected, what has transpired is that the victims of Epstein went to court to prosecute their abusers and settled out of court with them, provided the court records would be sealed.

Shrug. The victims favored monetary compensation over justice, allowing their abusers to continue to abuse other children.

These are the same judges that have tried to stop Trump at every turn from doing his job.

Pedos do run the world! I had read that years ago on the forums but didn't believe it.


debt.gif
 
I don't know if he even diddled anyone. But if he did and paid her off that deal should probably stay sealed.
I have no clue what deals Epstein made, but the courts will let us know what we get to know.
Democrats were in coverup mode when Biden let 320,000 kids get sex trafficked.
Same with Biden showering (and diddling?) Ashley.
The courts can do as they please? That’s a quick turnaround! Only a few weeks ago they were “activist” and doing things contrary to our interests.
 
The courts can do as they please? That’s a quick turnaround! Only a few weeks ago they were “activist” and doing things contrary to our interests.
I don't have a dog in the Epstein fight.
I don't like when courts overstep, but deciding these types of cases is what they get paid to do.
Let the chips fall where they may.
 
I don't have a dog in the Epstein fight.
I don't like when courts overstep, but deciding these types of cases is what they get paid to do.
Let the chips fall where they may.
But the case is different from the files. Grand jury testimony is only what the victims said. They aren’t privy to any sort of list. That’s in the hands of the DOJ. MAGA likes to make a big deal out of why wasn’t it released by Biden, but never have a sa5isfactory for why Trump isn’t.
 
The courts can do as they please? That’s a quick turnaround! Only a few weeks ago they were “activist” and doing things contrary to our interests.
A court doing what it pleases can certainly be against our interest.
 
But the case is different from the files. Grand jury testimony is only what the victims said. They aren’t privy to any sort of list. That’s in the hands of the DOJ. MAGA likes to make a big deal out of why wasn’t it released by Biden, but never have a sa5isfactory for why Trump isn’t.
So, who cares who's name is on some sort of list, when they didn't do anything to have a victim.....f

Knowing someone, and that person having your name, isn't a crime.
 
I don't see the problem.

Can what was done to them be changed by punishing somebody? Anybody?

Let the victims live in the protection of their anonymity and some cash to help them through life.

Or, are the feelings of those uninvolved in the case more important than the victims?

Epstein is dead. Ghislaine is in prison. Leave
At the same time would it be such a bad thing to investigate who performed these disgusting acts against these kids? Just saying.
 
But the case is different from the files. Grand jury testimony is only what the victims said. They aren’t privy to any sort of list. That’s in the hands of the DOJ. MAGA likes to make a big deal out of why wasn’t it released by Biden, but never have a satisfactory for why Trump isn’t.
I don't know if the courts will allow any "list" to be released if there are confidentiality agreements in effect and the victims want to remain unknown. Would the "list" be victims or perps? Either way there may be reasons to keep it sealed. This is why I'm saying the courts need to make the call.
 
I don't know if the courts will allow any "list" to be released if there are confidentiality agreements in effect and the victims want to remain unknown. Would the "list" be victims or perps? Either way there may be reasons to keep it sealed. This is why I'm saying the courts need to make the call.
DOJ would have any list. The courts only have the testimony of victims. It’s two different things that Trump/MAGA are trying to say are the same.
 
So, who cares who's name is on some sort of list, when they didn't do anything to have a victim.....f

Knowing someone, and that person having your name, isn't a crime.
How do we know, if Trump hides all the evidence?
 
15th post
How do we know, if Trump hides all the evidence?
how did he hide the victims? You said the Grand Jury was for the vicitms

Are you suggesting Trump hide victims? Where? When?
 
how did he hide the victims? You said the Grand Jury was for the vicitms

Are you suggesting Trump hide victims? Where? When?
No, he’s hiding the list. That has nothing to do with the victims. They didn’t have the list.
 
DOJ would have any list. The courts only have the testimony of victims. It’s two different things that Trump/MAGA are trying to say are the same.
Again genius, if Biden had the list, and Merrick Garland had the list, and Democracy was at stake, (See civics 10 on how we aren't a democracy) why didn't they release the list I mean dang the world was going to end when Trump won why no release to protect us all 🤡
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom