Judge denies releasing the Epstein clint list to the public

Votto

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
68,734
Reaction score
77,339
Points
3,605

As I suspected, what has transpired is that the victims of Epstein went to court to prosecute their abusers and settled out of court with them, provided the court records would be sealed.

Shrug. The victims favored monetary compensation over justice, allowing their abusers to continue to abuse other children.

These are the same judges that have tried to stop Trump at every turn from doing his job.
 

As I suspected, what has transpired is that the victims of Epstein went to court to prosecute their abusers and settled out of court with them, provided the court records would be sealed.

Shrug. The victims favored monetary compensation over justice, allowing their abusers to continue to abuse other children.

These are the same judges that have tried to stop Trump at every turn from doing his job.
~~~~~~~
So in the end the evidence and names have been sealed and Democrats are once again playing their game.
 

As I suspected, what has transpired is that the victims of Epstein went to court to prosecute their abusers and settled out of court with them, provided the court records would be sealed.

Shrug. The victims favored monetary compensation over justice, allowing their abusers to continue to abuse other children.

These are the same judges that have tried to stop Trump at every turn from doing his job.
Clint Epstein? Check your thread title! :abgg2q.jpg:
 
~~~~~~~
So in the end the evidence and names have been sealed and Democrats are once again playing their game.
Yep, the dems are happy with a talking point. Problem is, Trump is not on the ballot in 2026 or 2028, and the dems are still toxic at a 19% approval, so Epstein isn't helping them.
 
The demented LEFT once AGAIN step on another rake in their face. Their "Epstein crisis" DISTRACTION is going NOWHERE, but let's subpoena the Clinton's anyway.
Haha.
:777:
 

As I suspected, what has transpired is that the victims of Epstein went to court to prosecute their abusers and settled out of court with them, provided the court records would be sealed.

Shrug. The victims favored monetary compensation over justice, allowing their abusers to continue to abuse other children.

These are the same judges that have tried to stop Trump at every turn from doing his job.
The grand jury testimony isn’t the client list. MAGA lies.
 
~~~~~~~
So in the end the evidence and names have been sealed and Democrats are once again playing their game.
Untrue, the client list and grand jury testimony are separate items. Trump wants to pretend he’s “protecting the innocent”, when he’s just trying to hide the truth of his culpability.
 
Yep, the dems are happy with a talking point. Problem is, Trump is not on the ballot in 2026 or 2028, and the dems are still toxic at a 19% approval, so Epstein isn't helping them.
Even by the midterms he'll be old news.
 

As I suspected, what has transpired is that the victims of Epstein went to court to prosecute their abusers and settled out of court with them, provided the court records would be sealed.

Shrug. The victims favored monetary compensation over justice, allowing their abusers to continue to abuse other children.

These are the same judges that have tried to stop Trump at every turn from doing his job.
I don't see the problem.

Can what was done to them be changed by punishing somebody? Anybody?

Let the victims live in the protection of their anonymity and some cash to help them through life.

Or, are the feelings of those uninvolved in the case more important than the victims?

Epstein is dead. Ghislaine is in prison. Leave it be
 
I don't see the problem.

Can what was done to them be changed by punishing somebody? Anybody?

Let the victims live in the protection of their anonymity and some cash to help them through life.

Or, are the feelings of those uninvolved in the case more important than the victims?

Epstein is dead. Ghislaine is in prison. Leave it be
Trump is free and “concern for the victims” is just a dodge. Trump didn’t care about them then and doesn’t care about them now.
 
Only if Trump has resigned and gone into disgraced retirement, like Nixon.
The average voter will be saying, "Jeffrey who?". We saw the same thing in 2024 leading up to the election when the average voter saw the persecution and asked, "Why am I supposed to hate this guy so much? A book-keeping error doesn't seem like a legit felony target."
 
I don't see the problem.

Can what was done to them be changed by punishing somebody? Anybody?

Let the victims live in the protection of their anonymity and some cash to help them through life.

Or, are the feelings of those uninvolved in the case more important than the victims?

Epstein is dead. Ghislaine is in prison. Leave it be
Depends. If children were abused and their abusers are walking around free, justice is far from served.
 
Depends. If children were abused and their abusers are walking around free, justice is far from served.
Didn't say anything about 'Justice'.

I'm talking about the victims. 'Justice' is a purely social construct, anyway. In Goat-FuckerLand, what those Pervs did would be just another Thursday Night out with the boys. I'm more concerend with keeping the names, the identities of the victims private.

What good does it do to direct the scrutiny of the DISGUSTING FILTH toward them? And you know they would find out and smear their Pics all over their filthy headlines.

If the Vics got some money and want to be left alone, leave them alone.
 
The average voter will be saying, "Jeffrey who?". We saw the same thing in 2024 leading up to the election when the average voter saw the persecution and asked, "Why am I supposed to hate this guy so much? A book-keeping error doesn't seem like a legit felony target."
MAGA needs to quit pretending they care about the victims.
 
The grand jury testimony isn’t the client list. MAGA lies.
Why won't the Obama appointed Judge release the files if it's all about the democracy? Why not before the election? they had the info and just had to protect the democracy :auiqs.jpg: They are playing politics for power again to subject us to their communist ideals
 
15th post
Why won't the Obama appointed Judge release the files if it's all about the democracy? Why not before the election? they had the info and just had to protect the democracy :auiqs.jpg: They are playing politics for power again to subject us to their communist ideals
The judge doesn’t have files; he has grand jury testimony. Trump is doing a sleight of hand by equating the two and hiding the real files. Why won’t he release them, if they implicate Dems?
 
Trump is free and “concern for the victims” is just a dodge. Trump didn’t care about them then and doesn’t care about them now.
How about the "victims" preferred the huge cash "confidentiality" bonus to filing "statutory rape" complaints against some creeps?
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom