Judge bars 'warrantless' immigration enforcement raids at churches to protect 'religious freedom'

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
81,999
Reaction score
45,653
Points
2,605
Location
In a Republic, actually
‘The Trump administration has been barred from carrying out "warrantless" immigration enforcement operations in or "within 100 feet of the entrance" to various churches across the country.

In a 62-page memorandum and order, U.S. District Judge F. Dennis Saylor, a George W. Bush appointee, rejected the need for such efforts in all but the most limited of cases in the name of religious freedom.

"The prospect that a street-level law-enforcement agent—acting without a judicial warrant and with little or no supervisory control—could conduct a raid during a church service, or lie in wait to interrogate or seize congregants as they seek to enter a church, is profoundly troubling," the judge writes. "Indeed, according to the new policy, agents could conduct a raid, with weapons drawn, at any type of church proceeding—including a regular Sunday service, a wedding, a baptism, a christening, or a funeral—subject only to the exercise of their 'discretion' and 'common sense.'"

The 44-page lawsuit was filed in July 2025 against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) by an ecumenical coalition of churches, alleging violations of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), the First Amendment, and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).’


An abundance of irony.

Conservatives have long advanced the lie that they are ‘champions’ of ‘religious freedom,’ when in fact the Trump regime they support and defend violates religious freedom with its racist, bigoted anti-immigrant agenda.

Conservatives are infamous for their hypocrisy.
 
I thought libs were in favor of raiding churches, the way they defended Homoamerican activist Don Lemon a few weeks ago?
 
‘The Trump administration has been barred from carrying out "warrantless" immigration enforcement operations in or "within 100 feet of the entrance" to various churches across the country.

In a 62-page memorandum and order, U.S. District Judge F. Dennis Saylor, a George W. Bush appointee, rejected the need for such efforts in all but the most limited of cases in the name of religious freedom.

"The prospect that a street-level law-enforcement agent—acting without a judicial warrant and with little or no supervisory control—could conduct a raid during a church service, or lie in wait to interrogate or seize congregants as they seek to enter a church, is profoundly troubling," the judge writes. "Indeed, according to the new policy, agents could conduct a raid, with weapons drawn, at any type of church proceeding—including a regular Sunday service, a wedding, a baptism, a christening, or a funeral—subject only to the exercise of their 'discretion' and 'common sense.'"

The 44-page lawsuit was filed in July 2025 against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) by an ecumenical coalition of churches, alleging violations of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), the First Amendment, and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).’


An abundance of irony.

Conservatives have long advanced the lie that they are ‘champions’ of ‘religious freedom,’ when in fact the Trump regime they support and defend violates religious freedom with its racist, bigoted anti-immigrant agenda.

Conservatives are infamous for their hypocrisy.
so are you jones.....
 
Since when can unelected judges stop the president of the United States from enforcing immigration law?
 
Back
Top Bottom