Journalists fired! Time to learn to code.

[JoeB131]

You keep pretending that your parasitism and anti-Americanism isn't a thing. Unfortunately, this can't be skirted with a simple "whatever".

Uh, guy, i was in the army for 11 years... as far as I'm concerned, the Country still owes me a few...

Recognizing our society's faults isn't "anti-Americanism". It's valid self-examination.

A country that can allow a buffoon like Trump to be president because he is famous, has serious issues. That's the kind of asshattery you see in the third world, not here.

 

[JoeB131]

And yet these fake news organizations obsess about Trump having two sips of water. Even worse, two cones of ice cream.

Too much time on their hands. This can only mean, it's time to learn to code.

Okay, I know you guys need to pretend that Trump's craziness isn't a thing, and he's the victim. Whatever.

Oh! Look in the back left row! All the way to the left!

View attachment 243394

Wow, you spent time putting that together... that's kind of... sad.

 

[Marion Morrison]

And yet these fake news organizations obsess about Trump having two sips of water. Even worse, two cones of ice cream.

Too much time on their hands. This can only mean, it's time to learn to code.

Okay, I know you guys need to pretend that Trump's craziness isn't a thing, and he's the victim. Whatever.

Oh! Look in the back left row! All the way to the left!

View attachment 243394

Wow, you spent time putting that together... that's kind of... sad.

 

[Marion Morrison]

You keep pretending that your parasitism and anti-Americanism isn't a thing. Unfortunately, this can't be skirted with a simple "whatever".

Uh, guy, i was in the army for 11 years... as far as I'm concerned, the Country still owes me a few...

Recognizing our society's faults isn't "anti-Americanism". It's valid self-examination.

A country that can allow a buffoon like Trump to be president because he is famous, has serious issues. That's the kind of asshattery you see in the third world, not here.

Moar Orange Man Bad butthurt! LMAO!

 

[JoeB131]

Naw, dude,t hat was pathetic... Have that many people butt-hurt you here that you need to make a list? And I didn't even make the front row... I need to try harder.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Naw, dude,t hat was pathetic... Have that many people butt-hurt you here that you need to make a list? And I didn't even make the front row... I need to try harder.

You're so inept, you were an afterthought.

 

[JoeB131]

You're so inept, you were an afterthought.

Oh, really? So that's why you start flame zone threads about me, because I don't occupy space in your head rent free?

 

[Marion Morrison]

You're so inept, you were an afterthought.

Oh, really? So that's why you start flame zone threads about me, because I don't occupy space in your head rent free?

That's why you're too ***** to show?

 

[Ame®icano]

HuffPost and BuzzFeed are yellow press that in between fake stories, spam the internet with rumors and "who said what" on Twitter.

Um, yeah.. What Trump says on Twitter is news.. Sorry.

The way you act when he tweets, it is.

Actually, we could eliminate coal usage in a year or two... it's pretty much eliminating itself. But even when coal usage hit it's peak, the number of coal miners was still declining long before because they automated the process to the point where they just didn't need to send guys to dig for it.

What you are proposing is the worst kind of socialism... continuing to do something just to make work for people.

I don't remember proposing anything. That's your interpretation.

I stated that we still need coal and coal miners, not just for energy, but for steel industry as well.

And coal miner is not just a guy with the shovel digging coal in some hole.

 

[Theowl32]

What do American patriots call the events?

A good start.

When American steel workers were getting fired as these journalists advanced globalism and the manufacturing industry being shipped to elsewhere, their response was to "cry more" and "learn to code".

Well that's it. Time to pick up the computers HuffPo feminists. I for one would seriously, seriously like to see these clueless morons attempt any logical activity - their brains will probably explode.

Here's the thing.. steelworkers lost their jobs because the processes became more automated.

I'm not sure i want "automated" journalism, even though we are there. One person writes the story and everyone else just copies his work verbatim? How does that advance the flow of information.

But you probably can't see beyond , "Journalists are better educated than I am, and they say mein Trumpenfuhrer bad! MAGA!!!!"

Was the process of exporting their jobs to China automated?

JoeB, it's time to learn to code. Trump waved the magic wand and suddenly the jobs are back.


Journalists do not even have an education, I have several master's degrees. Try again.

your constant bashing of my former profession is annoying.

no education? enemy of the people? waved a magic wand? exported jobs to china?

man, you "sensationalize" headlines and statements as much as *they* do anymore.

The language you are responding to may be hyperbolic, but if you were an actual journalist, you should be the first to criticize the leftist media that works so deceptively to craft opinion instead of reporting as objectively as possible.

THe days of Walter Cronkite and Huntley/Brinkley are gone.

Left wing journalism has been going since Cronkite. They pushed the propaganda that still effects our psyche to this day about the Vietnam War.

Yes, the actual crime to the leftists during those days (and now for that matter) is the US having the gall to prevent the spread of communism. That, is the real crime to them .

Plenty of propaganda pushed and stating how all of that was "American imperialism." Hollywood naturally got involved. Movie after movie. Message after message.

Journalists giving away troop movements. Delightfully doing it.

Been going on longer than we know. Today, admittedly it has gotten too absurd to contemplate.

 

[miketx]

Sorry not pressing your click bait...

But lets point out that you are proposing InfoWars over actual real Journalism... So you prefer to be lied and fed your ego rather than actually face the truth..

Pretty sad life you lead...

Sez the CNN parrot.

 

[JoeB131]

That's why you're too ***** to show?

Naw, just nothing there to discuss. I occupy space in your head rent free... Heh, heh, heh....

I stated that we still need coal and coal miners, not just for energy, but for steel industry as well.

And coal miner is not just a guy with the shovel digging coal in some hole.

Well, you can state that, but it's just not true. We could get rid of most coal usage... and we'd be better off for it.

 

[Marion Morrison]

That's why you're too ***** to show?

Naw, just nothing there to discuss. I occupy space in your head rent free... Heh, heh, heh....

I stated that we still need coal and coal miners, not just for energy, but for steel industry as well.

And coal miner is not just a guy with the shovel digging coal in some hole.

Well, you can state that, but it's just not true. We could get rid of most coal usage... and we'd be better off for it.

Only in LaLa land, dumbass.

 

[Ame®icano]

That's why you're too ***** to show?

Naw, just nothing there to discuss. I occupy space in your head rent free... Heh, heh, heh....

I stated that we still need coal and coal miners, not just for energy, but for steel industry as well.

And coal miner is not just a guy with the shovel digging coal in some hole.

Well, you can state that, but it's just not true. We could get rid of most coal usage... and we'd be better off for it.

You saying something is not true, doesn't make it not true.

The steel production, and cement production are heavily dependent on coal. Sure, heat can be generated also by natural gas, which is easier to transport and burn, but technology for consistent combustion is not there yet.

The steel and cement production require higher radiative heat transfer that coal provides. Natural gas simply doesn't have that because of sharper burning characteristics and also lacks dissipation of heat.

I do automation and process control, and I've been involved with numerous projects of setting out automotive ovens, air supply houses, steel heat treatment processes, with experience that got me to one of four test projects (that are offered and I know of) in attempts to convert coal to natural gas. None of them proved consistent trend in production and went back to design table.

But hey, what do I know, you... the expert, are saying it's not true.

 

[Marion Morrison]

That's why you're too ***** to show?

Naw, just nothing there to discuss. I occupy space in your head rent free... Heh, heh, heh....

I stated that we still need coal and coal miners, not just for energy, but for steel industry as well.

And coal miner is not just a guy with the shovel digging coal in some hole.

Well, you can state that, but it's just not true. We could get rid of most coal usage... and we'd be better off for it.

You saying something is not true, doesn't make it not true.

The steel production, and cement production is heavily dependent on coal. Sure, heat can be generated also by natural gas, which is easier to transport and burn, but technology for consistent combustion is not there yet.

The steel and cement production require higher radiative heat transfer that coal provides. Natural gas simply doesn't have that because of sharper burning characteristics and also lacks dissipation of heat.

I do automation and process control, and I've been involved with numerous projects of setting out automotive ovens, air supply houses, steel heat treatment processes, with experience that got me to one of four test projects (that are offered and I know of) in attempts to convert coal to natural gas. None of them proved consistent trend in production and wend back to design table.

But hey, what do I know, you... the expert, are saying it's not true.

How hot is needed for cement again? 30K degrees? Boy! Was I off, ..only 2700 degrees is needed.

 

[Ame®icano]

That's why you're too ***** to show?

Naw, just nothing there to discuss. I occupy space in your head rent free... Heh, heh, heh....

I stated that we still need coal and coal miners, not just for energy, but for steel industry as well.

And coal miner is not just a guy with the shovel digging coal in some hole.

Well, you can state that, but it's just not true. We could get rid of most coal usage... and we'd be better off for it.

You saying something is not true, doesn't make it not true.

The steel production, and cement production is heavily dependent on coal. Sure, heat can be generated also by natural gas, which is easier to transport and burn, but technology for consistent combustion is not there yet.

The steel and cement production require higher radiative heat transfer that coal provides. Natural gas simply doesn't have that because of sharper burning characteristics and also lacks dissipation of heat.

I do automation and process control, and I've been involved with numerous projects of setting out automotive ovens, air supply houses, steel heat treatment processes, with experience that got me to one of four test projects (that are offered and I know of) in attempts to convert coal to natural gas. None of them proved consistent trend in production and wend back to design table.

But hey, what do I know, you... the expert, are saying it's not true.

How hot is needed for cement again? 30K degrees?

I am not chemistry guy, I am an engineer.

Our goal was to provide heat consistency on 3000 deg Celsius, but I think kiln require to be heated to about half of that.

 

[Marion Morrison]

That's why you're too ***** to show?

Naw, just nothing there to discuss. I occupy space in your head rent free... Heh, heh, heh....

I stated that we still need coal and coal miners, not just for energy, but for steel industry as well.

And coal miner is not just a guy with the shovel digging coal in some hole.

Well, you can state that, but it's just not true. We could get rid of most coal usage... and we'd be better off for it.

You saying something is not true, doesn't make it not true.

The steel production, and cement production is heavily dependent on coal. Sure, heat can be generated also by natural gas, which is easier to transport and burn, but technology for consistent combustion is not there yet.

The steel and cement production require higher radiative heat transfer that coal provides. Natural gas simply doesn't have that because of sharper burning characteristics and also lacks dissipation of heat.

I do automation and process control, and I've been involved with numerous projects of setting out automotive ovens, air supply houses, steel heat treatment processes, with experience that got me to one of four test projects (that are offered and I know of) in attempts to convert coal to natural gas. None of them proved consistent trend in production and wend back to design table.

But hey, what do I know, you... the expert, are saying it's not true.

How hot is needed for cement again? 30K degrees?

I am not chemistry guy, I am an engineer.

Our goal was to provide heat consistency on 3000 deg Celsius, but I think kiln require to be heated to about half of that.

I just read 2700, but I think they go to 3000 here, makes it stronger.

 

[Ame®icano]

That's why you're too ***** to show?

Naw, just nothing there to discuss. I occupy space in your head rent free... Heh, heh, heh....

I stated that we still need coal and coal miners, not just for energy, but for steel industry as well.

And coal miner is not just a guy with the shovel digging coal in some hole.

Well, you can state that, but it's just not true. We could get rid of most coal usage... and we'd be better off for it.

You saying something is not true, doesn't make it not true.

The steel production, and cement production is heavily dependent on coal. Sure, heat can be generated also by natural gas, which is easier to transport and burn, but technology for consistent combustion is not there yet.

The steel and cement production require higher radiative heat transfer that coal provides. Natural gas simply doesn't have that because of sharper burning characteristics and also lacks dissipation of heat.

I do automation and process control, and I've been involved with numerous projects of setting out automotive ovens, air supply houses, steel heat treatment processes, with experience that got me to one of four test projects (that are offered and I know of) in attempts to convert coal to natural gas. None of them proved consistent trend in production and wend back to design table.

But hey, what do I know, you... the expert, are saying it's not true.

How hot is needed for cement again? 30K degrees?

I am not chemistry guy, I am an engineer.

Our goal was to provide heat consistency on 3000 deg Celsius, but I think kiln require to be heated to about half of that.

I just read 2700, but I think they go to 3000 here, makes it stronger.

Thats about right, 3000 C is around 5400 F, take half from it...

 

[Marion Morrison]

Naw, just nothing there to discuss. I occupy space in your head rent free... Heh, heh, heh....

Well, you can state that, but it's just not true. We could get rid of most coal usage... and we'd be better off for it.

You saying something is not true, doesn't make it not true.

The steel production, and cement production is heavily dependent on coal. Sure, heat can be generated also by natural gas, which is easier to transport and burn, but technology for consistent combustion is not there yet.

The steel and cement production require higher radiative heat transfer that coal provides. Natural gas simply doesn't have that because of sharper burning characteristics and also lacks dissipation of heat.

I do automation and process control, and I've been involved with numerous projects of setting out automotive ovens, air supply houses, steel heat treatment processes, with experience that got me to one of four test projects (that are offered and I know of) in attempts to convert coal to natural gas. None of them proved consistent trend in production and wend back to design table.

But hey, what do I know, you... the expert, are saying it's not true.

How hot is needed for cement again? 30K degrees?

I am not chemistry guy, I am an engineer.

Our goal was to provide heat consistency on 3000 deg Celsius, but I think kiln require to be heated to about half of that.

I just read 2700, but I think they go to 3000 here, makes it stronger.

Thats about right, 3000 C is around 5400 F, take half from it...

The hotter the kiln, the stronger the bond.

 

[Deno]

Sorry not pressing your click bait...

But lets point out that you are proposing InfoWars over actual real Journalism... So you prefer to be lied and fed your ego rather than actually face the truth..

Pretty sad life you lead...

This coming from a tard that laps up

TOTAL BULL SHIT from the likes of

cnn and msnbc like a cat with warm milk……