John Kiriakou- former CIA agent who did time for allegedly exposing CIA torture program. Does he deserve a pardon?

shockedcanadian

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
43,909
Reaction score
42,954
Points
3,605
I listen to many former CIA agents on youtube, the odd former FBI agent from time to time. I take their stories with a grain of salt, all of them are good story tellers, John one of the best. I realize that memories are often skewed and sometimes full of holes they fill in themselves. Others might have an agenda or influencing their viewers, who knows.

John has taken the smart approach of being on every podcast, large or small to tell his story, even Tucker Carlson. It seems clear to me he's decided "I'm going to be an open book now".

He has been against torture from the beginning. This is an important stance especially at the most difficult time immediately after 9/11 where everyone, including regular citizens like myself wanted revenge and justice for what happened, by any means necessary as far as I am concerned. I won't forget the transit ride home that day from work, where I just looked around and wanted to scream at people "how in the F can we sit here quietly when so many died from these animals"!

The bottom line is that blood were in the eyes of everyone, especially intelligence agencies I'm sure and I was very supportive of Bush and America striking back to whomever was involved. I digress...

The bottom line is that John was charged, really he was overcharged until he accepted a plea for far less than they tried to unfairly push, basically for discussing the CIA torture program. Most after hearing his story would say he was treated unfairly, seemed to be a circumstance of "make an example out of him", which is not how the law should work and John was unfairly treated. This was done under the Obama administration also, so, Trump could feel he is not only protecting the Constitution, but also going against Obamas DOJ really.

Should he have been fired? Perhaps. Reprimanded within the agency? Absolutely. He should at least be able to speak about WHY he has taken a position. The entire post-9/11 actions did great harm to U.S reputation around the globe.

Torture doesn't work. Rarely has. Not only is it morally wrong and illegal but the CIA themselves know IT IS NOT EFFECTIVE. People will say whatever they must to stop the suffering. It's what lowly, unsophisticated dirty cops with shyte for brains engage in, not what are supposed to be effective agencies, be it the CIA or FBI.

If any of you know his story, the core question I ask, is should Trump pardon John?

I am in the camp that it's probably time. It would also appeal Trump once again to a broader population because support for this guy is clearly fairly high and Trump will remind everyone he is not an ideologue. You should correct a wrong. He paid a steep price, as many of us who blow the whistle have (though I'm not in the same class he is in).
 
Last edited:
I'd like to consider that question.

What was the exact crime of which he was convicted, and what sentence did he get? Is he currently incarcerated?
 
I'd like to consider that question.

What was the exact crime of which he was convicted, and what sentence did he get? Is he currently incarcerated?
He was charged with multiple allegations because in an interview he mentioned that torture was occurring. They tried to stockpile excessive crimes and even tried to entrap him.

He did 23 months, lost all of his wealth and his marriage. In effect, the government piled on him and he is very popular in Europe and other nations.
 
He was charged with multiple allegations because in an interview he mentioned that torture was occurring. They tried to stockpile excessive crimes and even tried to entrap him.

He did 23 months, lost all of his wealth and his marriage. In effect, the government piled on him and he is very popular in Europe and other nations.
Then I will say about him what I say about a controversial group of recent pardon recipients:

He broke the law, and he was punished for it. Punished out of proportion to the seriousness of his actions. Pardon him now, so he can get on with his life, but the pardon should not be taken as an edorsement of what he did.
 
Then I will say about him what I say about a controversial group of recent pardon recipients:

He broke the law, and he was punished for it. Punished out of proportion to the seriousness of his actions. Pardon him now, so he can get on with his life, but the pardon should not be taken as an edorsement of what he did.
Well in fairness, he was speaking out against those in his agency who were in fact, breaking the law. Really in a broad sense, it lead to Obamas election victory in my opinion.
 
I listen to many former CIA agents on youtube, the odd former FBI agent from time to time. I take their stories with a grain of salt, all of them are good story tellers, John one of the best. I realize that memories are often skewed and sometimes full of holes they fill in themselves. Others might have an agenda or influencing their viewers, who knows.

John has taken the smart approach of being on every podcast, large or small to tell his story, even Tucker Carlson. It seems clear to me he's decided "I'm going to be an open book now".

He has been against torture from the beginning. This is an important stance especially at the most difficult time immediately after 9/11 where everyone, including regular citizens like myself wanted revenge and justice for what happened, by any means necessary as far as I am concerned. I won't forget the transit ride home that day from work, where I just looked around and wanted to scream at people "how in the F can we sit here quietly when so many died from these animals"!

The bottom line is that blood were in the eyes of everyone, especially intelligence agencies I'm sure and I was very supportive of Bush and America striking back to whomever was involved. I digress...

The bottom line is that John was charged, really he was overcharged until he accepted a plea for far less than they tried to unfairly push, basically for discussing the CIA torture program. Most after hearing his story would say he was treated unfairly, seemed to be a circumstance of "make an example out of him", which is not how the law should work and John was unfairly treated. This was done under the Obama administration also, so, Trump could feel he is not only protecting the Constitution, but also going against Obamas DOJ really.

Should he have been fired? Perhaps. Reprimanded within the agency? Absolutely. He should at least be able to speak about WHY he has taken a position. The entire post-9/11 actions did great harm to U.S reputation around the globe.

Torture doesn't work. Rarely has. Not only is it morally wrong and illegal but the CIA themselves know IT IS NOT EFFECTIVE. People will say whatever they must to stop the suffering. It's what lowly, unsophisticated dirty cops with shyte for brains engage in, not what are supposed to be effective agencies, be it the CIA or FBI.

If any of you know his story, the core question I ask, is should Trump pardon John?

I am in the camp that it's probably time. It would also appeal Trump once again to a broader population because support for this guy is clearly fairly high and Trump will remind everyone he is not an ideologue. You should correct a wrong. He paid a steep price, as many of us who blow the whistle have (though I'm not in the same class he is in).
Are you/he talking about waterboarding? Waterboarding was considered an interrogation technique until the definition of torture was changed to include it. Apparently, it was a very effective method of getting information from Sheik Khalid about the 9/11 attacks.
 
Are you/he talking about waterboarding? Waterboarding was considered an interrogation technique until the definition of torture was changed to include it. Apparently, it was a very effective method of getting information from Sheik Khalid about the 9/11 attacks.
Apparently it was not effective and the movie Zero Dark 30 was an extreme exaggeration as no credible, high level intelligence was collected via torture.

This has been known for 100 years by the way. Suddenly some determined agents were going to change what is already known?

It really hurt the U.S reputation and to this day China, Russia and others refer to it for propaganda purposes.
 
Apparently it was not effective and the movie Zero Dark 30 was an extreme exaggeration as no credible, high level intelligence was collected via torture.

This has been known for 100 years by the way. Suddenly some determined agents were going to change what is already known?

It really hurt the U.S reputation and to this day China, Russia and others refer to it for propaganda purposes.
So is waterboarding torture or merely ineffective? Does it need both to warrant your condemnation?

I don't pay attention to Chinese or Russian propaganda.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom