Joe Biden To Sit Down With George Stephanopoulos After Debate Debacle

[iamwhatiseem]

It is live or it ain't real.
Already announced it will be taped.
Also - carefully constructing the time and place to put Biden in the best circumstances for his condition.
We shall see where the long-long time Democrat supporter George take it.
Will he so obviously "save" Biden like Tapper did when he stumbles? When he falters, and he will - what will George do?

 

[theHawk]

Couple of months ago Joe had a one minute prerecorded talk to the camera.

Seven edit cuts.

I’m glad they are doing it. The left will see this edited and scripted “interview” and he will sound and look lively, might be enough to get them to stick with him.

 

[Weatherman2020]

I’m glad they are doing it. The left will see this edited and scripted “interview” and he will sound and look lively, might be enough to get them to stick with him.

I’m thinking a lot of AI and CGI will be used.

 

[Independent thinker]

It is going to be taped, then edited, then aired.
Why don't they use holograms and AI, like the Elvis show now playing in London? It will be just as "live."

If they want to convince us of his competency, release the Hur tapes.

Since you brought it up, ABC is taping the interview with Biden Fri morning, claims they will release the transcripts of the interview, then will heavily edit the interview to put Biden in his best light to play during prime time Fri night. Something tells me the transcripts will not show Biden looking around aimlessly with his mouth open or talking incoherently, which is why Garland won't release the Hur audio tapes, because they won't match the transcripts. They aren't going to transcript a bunch of incoherent words and sentences, only what they can actually understand.

 

[Independent thinker]

It’s all going to be:
“January 6th, January 6th”
“Insurrection, insurrection”
“Threat to democracy, threat to democracy”

And don't forget the Supreme Court will allow Trump to break any law he wishes.

 

[Independent thinker]

It is live or it ain't real.
Already announced it will be taped.
Also - carefully constructing the time and place to put Biden in the best circumstances for his condition.
We shall see where the long-long time Democrat supporter George take it.
Will he so obviously "save" Biden like Tapper did when he stumbles? When he falters, and he will - what will George do?

Edit, edit, edit.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Good move.

 

[Independent thinker]

I’m glad they are doing it. The left will see this edited and scripted “interview” and he will sound and look lively, might be enough to get them to stick with him.

This all might be working out too well for Trump and the right. I don't want Biden replaced but it is probably too late for that. The writing is on the wall. While I'm sure Trump can also beat the others, I'd like Biden to continue. Why take any chances with someone who is actually coherent?

 

[Markle]

And don't forget the Supreme Court will allow Trump to break any law he wishes.

That's just goofy. IF what you are trying to infer is true, then it goes for President Biden too.

 

[Independent thinker]

That's just goofy. IF what you are trying to infer is true, then it goes for President Biden too.

You misunderstood me. I was replying to a post listing all of the things ABC would do with the interview including saying Trump was a threat to democracy and I added that ABC would also let Biden say that the SC would let Trump break any laws he wishes

 

[Markle]

You misunderstood me. I was replying to a post listing all of the things ABC would do with the interview including saying Trump was a threat to democracy and I added that ABC would also let Biden say that the SC would let Trump break any laws he wishes

My mistake! Sorry.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

And don't forget the Supreme Court will allow Trump to break any law he wishes.

Markle That's just goofy. IF what you are trying to infer is true, then it goes for President Biden too.

John Edgar Slow Horses 100% Correct. But the ruling does give far too much power to the President.

Defeat Trump, then place nine justices on SCOTUS by presidential fiat as part of his core constitutional power,

 

[Independent thinker]

Markle That's just goofy. IF what you are trying to infer is true, then it goes for President Biden too.

John Edgar Slow Horses 100% Correct. But the ruling does give far too much power to the President.

Defeat Trump, then place nine justices on SCOTUS by presidential fiat as part of his core constitutional power,

The ruling didn't change one damn thing. Presidents had a high level but not total level of immunity last month and they still have the same level today. Democrats wanted to change that but failed.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Independentthinker is either stupid or a stone-cold liar. No Democrat ever wanted to give the President total immunity, which is all MAGA.

 

[Markle]

Independentthinker is either stupid or a stone-cold liar. No Democrat ever wanted to give the President total immunity, which is all MAGA.

Why lie? As you know, there is no total immunity, nothing has changed. Grow up.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Why lie? As you know, there is no total immunity, nothing has changed. Grow up.

You said "Democrats wanted to change that but failed." No, MAGA wanted the power.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Markle and Independentthinker are powermad MAGA.

Stop that shit and celebrate something important, or go join the defeated Tories in the United Kingdom today,

 

[Weatherman2020]

Markle That's just goofy. IF what you are trying to infer is true, then it goes for President Biden too.

John Edgar Slow Horses 100% Correct. But the ruling does give far too much power to the President.

Defeat Trump, then place nine justices on SCOTUS by presidential fiat as part of his core constitutional power,

Good to know you think it’s within Trumps scope to assassinate all his political opponents. Looking forward to next year.

 

[Independent thinker]

Independentthinker is either stupid or a stone-cold liar. No Democrat ever wanted to give the President total immunity, which is all MAGA.

It doesn't matter what anyone wants. It's what is. Presidents have always had substantial immunity to most decisions they make. That has not changed. Nothing has changed. The SC only affirmed what we have always had. It is democrats who wanted to change the status quo to presidents have no immunity.

 

[Independent thinker]

Good to know you think it’s within Trumps scope to assassinate all his political opponents. Looking forward to next year.

Chris Matthews said we should be very afraid of Trump lining up everyone who ever wronged him in front of the firing squad. Once in a while he actually comes up with a good idea.