Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 68,371
- 34,026
- 2,300
They gave an opinion and stated it was such.No, it appears they lied, and you are a cultist.
That by definition cannot BE a lie
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They gave an opinion and stated it was such.No, it appears they lied, and you are a cultist.
Experts that never even looked at the laptop. Yeah, call it what you want. We all know better.They gave an opinion and stated it was such.
That by definition cannot BE a lie
The fact that you turn a blind eye to the mountain of evidence that has already been found already (without the help of the FBI), shows your hand. You are terrified that they are going to prove what you and i already know. He accepted bribes. We all know it. Its just a matter of whether or not they can prove it.I have seen endless bullshit allegations.
But then we see that constantly from you folks so… nope.
No evidence
Claiming the tapes exist means nothing in court. You and i both agree on that. The problem is, if we do end up hearing those tapes, you will STILL deny it and push back on all evidence that is presented.
Why do you require a taped confession in the first place? How often do you think federal prosecutors have a god damn tape of the accused? Its rare as fuck! They generally just use banks records to get a conviction.Try me. Produce the tapes. But it may just be your latest "Hey,look over there" like the whack-a-Whistleblower.
Why do you require a taped confession in the first place? How often do you think federal prosecutors have a god damn tape of the accused? Its rare as fuck! They generally just use banks records to get a conviction.
Allegations ain’t evidenceThe fact that you turn a blind eye to the mountain of evidence that has already been found already (without the help of the FBI), shows your hand. You are terrified that they are going to prove what you and i already know. He accepted bribes. We all know it. Its just a matter of whether or not they can prove it.
Call it an OPINION. Because that’s what it wasExperts that never even looked at the laptop. Yeah, call it what you want. We all know better.
That’s funny. You take every bullshit ALLEGATION against Trump and claim it’s the gospel LUSH. Too funny.....Allegations ain’t evidence
Good ol' Senator Grassley has some dirt on dirty Joe, the kid sniffing walking stick figure.
"Jun 12, 2023
In a shocking revelation, Senator Grassley claims that a foreign national possesses secret audio recordings of him bribing Joe and Hunter Biden. This breaking news sends shockwaves through the political sphere, raising questions about the corruption and illicit dealings involving the Bidens. Where is the DOJ?"
Why do you require a taped confession in the first place?
the press said the 51 experts concluded it was Russian disinformation.Call it an OPINION. Because that’s what it was
Soon. Patience is a virtue.So when do we get to hear the tapes?
How about the Dems? Are THEY saying the bank records are a lie?Because you people lie.
How about the Dems? Are THEY saying the bank records are a lie?
What is "embarrassing" about investigating obvious bribery?Just keep harping. The cat is already out of the bag about what the MAGAts are doing. It's embarrassing.
How about the Dems? Are THEY saying the bank records are a lie?
What is "embarrassing" about investigating obvious bribery?
If neither side is denying the bank records exist, why would anyone question whether or not they exist?You seem to have the misunderstanding that "you people" referred to Republicans or Trumplings. I'm talking about partisans on both sides.
there are 17 recordings ... 15 with the bag man and 2 for the big guy .