The skank issue came up in court through Arias, so it wasn't something influenced by media. If it was a question that the judge decided wouldn't be used then it boggles the mind why, she, herself, would ask it.
I wasn't talking about the skank question in particular being influenced by the media. I was just saying in general if some of the jurors were influenced by the media and asked questions because of it then it could be a problem even if they weren't in deliberations. The skank question IMO had no actual value in the trial and was just smart assy, I remember wondering why it was allowed in the first place when it was read. Apparently there were over 400 questions that were not read, can you imagine how long that would have taken. Its possible the question was mixed in there and with so many other questions not allowed she may not have remembered or something who knows. I'm interested to know what else wasn't allowed.
As an aside, I do like the idea of jury questions, the skank thing notwithstanding. It really does get the trial closer to a search for the truth rather than manipulation via either side's narrative, and really, isn't that what we want, real justice? Not having people being locked up or released because one side or the other was craftier, but rather because they are actually guilty or innocent, appeals to me.