Jihadist Ritual Murder & Mutilation at the Mall

[Hoffstra]

And the inhabitants were called 'PHilistines' , not Palestinians. Philistines were NOT Arabs

In Hebrew the word for Philistines and Palestinians, is the same.

 

[Roudy]

That sounds more like reality to me. You have various sources confirming same account.

Yea, various sources quoting the same unknown sources. .

Nope. Pay attention, once again, they are all telling you the sources, the govt. officials and doctors, and forensics experts, all these various independent news organizations had conversations with. And they all reached the same conclusion, independent of each other. But for their safety from the harm Islamic jihadist animals could do to them, they have asked their names be withheld. Makes perfect sense.

You just can't handle the truth about what your brethren is capable of, in the name of Islam.

 

[Roudy]

And the inhabitants were called 'PHilistines' , not Palestinians. Philistines were NOT Arabs

In Hebrew the word for Philistines and Palestinians, is the same.

Be clear, what are you saying, are the Arabs who call themselves today Palestinians, descendants of the Philistines? Hmmmmm......? Someone should keep stats on the ever changing ancestry of Palestinians. Ha ha ha.

 

[Hoffstra]

Be clear, what are you saying, are the Arabs who call themselves today Palestinians, descendants of the Philistines? Hmmmmm......? Someone should keep stats on the ever changing ancestry of Palestinians. Ha ha ha.

The Hebrew word for Palestinians and Phillistines, is the same.

 

[Sunni Man]

That sounds more like reality to me. You have various sources confirming same account.

Yea, various sources quoting the same unknown sources. .

Nope. Pay attention, once again, they are all telling you the sources, the govt. officials and doctors, and forensics experts, all these various independent news organizations had conversations with. And they all reached the same conclusion, independent of each other.

So all of the unnamed and unknown sources reached the same independent unknown source conclusion.

LOL.......the zionist version of reality is a laugh riot. ..

 

[whitehall]

Interesting angle by the NY Times when they open the article. The "militants" (the NY Times refuses to call them terrorists) were only identified by the color of their shirts after the mall was recaptured. The NY Times casually mentions that video cameras indicate that "wounded civilians were executed" but the article is careful to point out that "there is no evidence of torture"...on the video cameras. The Times does not speculate on victim testimony.

 

[Jroc]

So is it all "conspiracy" the account of doctors, soldiers and victims?

‘You find people with hooks hanging from the roof,’ said one Kenyan doctor.

They removed eyes, ears, noses.

A soldier, who took pictures at a bread counter and at the ArtCaffe, said he was so traumatised by what he saw he has had to seek counselling."


Is it all lies? is it all their imagination? were they making stories up just for the fun of it? are all of these fabricated witness accounts?

Please. give me a break.




Kenya mall attack torture claims emerge from soldiers: 'Eyes gouged out, bodies on hooks, fingers removed' | Mail Online

I'ts only a conspriacy for people like Coyote

 

[Connery]

According to respected news sources:

LOL.......by who exactly are they so respected?? .

What a joke.

Neither article you posted had any first hand accounts.

And both referred to unnamed sources for their information.

Lame.........

Try again bud....They are secondary sources which should be treated with the same respect as any other secondary source even one that would support your position. That is what discussion is all about.

 

[Jroc]

Similar acts of torture, rape, beheading and mutilation regularly occur in South America, Mexico, Africa (Charles Taylor, the Congo). These tactics have nothing to do with "religion". They are intended to intimidate and terrorize civilians.

A young man appears held down by masked men. His head is pulled back, with a knife to his throat. He does not struggle and appears resigned to his fate. Speaking in Arabic, the background speaker, or “narrator,” chants a number of Muslim prayers and supplications, mostly condemning Christianity, which, because of the Trinity, is referred to as a polytheistic faith: “Let Allah be avenged on the polytheist apostate”; “Allah empower your religion, make it victorious against the polytheists”; “Allah, defeat the infidels at the hands of the Muslims”; “There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger.”

Then, to cries of “Allahu Akbar!”—or, “God is great!”—the man holding the knife to the apostate’s throat begins to slice away, even as the victim appears calmly mouthing a prayer. It takes nearly two minutes of graphic knife-carving to sever the Christian’s head, which is then held aloft to more Islamic cries and slogans of victory.

Clash DailyGRAPHIC: MUSLIMS CUT OFF CHRISTIAN'S HEAD FOR NOT RENOUNCING CHRIST - Clash Daily

 

[Jroc]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6F-EESY_JlA]horror Muslims terror murderess Islamist Terrorists Extremists Cut Girls Nose - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Sunni Man]

According to respected news sources:

LOL.......by who exactly are they so respected?? .

What a joke.

Neither article you posted had any first hand accounts.

And both referred to unnamed sources for their information.

Lame.........

Try again bud....They are secondary sources which should be treated with the same respect as any other secondary source even one that would support your position. That is what discussion is all about.

A fake secondary source is still a fake source.

True story.............

 

[Jroc]

LOL.......by who exactly are they so respected?? .

What a joke.

Neither article you posted had any first hand accounts.

And both referred to unnamed sources for their information.

Lame.........

Try again bud....They are secondary sources which should be treated with the same respect as any other secondary source even one that would support your position. That is what discussion is all about.

A fake secondary source is still a fake source.

True story.............

All you haft to do is look around Sunni boy. no one needs to lie or make up anything.

 

[Connery]

LOL.......by who exactly are they so respected?? .

What a joke.

Neither article you posted had any first hand accounts.

And both referred to unnamed sources for their information.

Lame.........

Try again bud....They are secondary sources which should be treated with the same respect as any other secondary source even one that would support your position. That is what discussion is all about.

A fake secondary source is still a fake source.

True story.............

Try again that is why we discuss these issues. We find out what is true and what is not. You are drawing conclusions without any supportive evidence.

 

[Sunni Man]

Try again bud....They are secondary sources which should be treated with the same respect as any other secondary source even one that would support your position. That is what discussion is all about.

A fake secondary source is still a fake source.

True story.............

Try again

What's there to 'try again'?

A story with zero evidence backed by zero facts isn't credible by anyone's measure..

Although, maybe it is to zionist jews and their supporters.

But not to anyone with a brain........

 

[Roudy]

Be clear, what are you saying, are the Arabs who call themselves today Palestinians, descendants of the Philistines? Hmmmmm......? Someone should keep stats on the ever changing ancestry of Palestinians. Ha ha ha.

The Hebrew word for Palestinians and Phillistines, is the same.

They sound the same but don't mean the same. Israelis usually refer to Palestinians as "Arabs" which is exactly what they are. Nice duck, I'll take that as an admission.

 

[Roudy]

LOL.......by who exactly are they so respected?? .

What a joke.

Neither article you posted had any first hand accounts.

And both referred to unnamed sources for their information.

Lame.........

Try again bud....They are secondary sources which should be treated with the same respect as any other secondary source even one that would support your position. That is what discussion is all about.

A fake secondary source is still a fake source.

True story.............

Dumb as a doorknob is incapable of rational thought and logical thinking. He thinks just because the sources that spoke to all these independent news agencies requested that their names remain anonymous, it means the sources don't exist and therefore all these legitimate news agencies are lying.

 

[irosie91]

And the inhabitants were called 'PHilistines' , not Palestinians. Philistines were NOT Arabs

In Hebrew the word for Philistines and Palestinians, is the same.

No it isn't -----Philistines are the people who lived for a fairly short
time in and around Ashkelon ----biblical times of "judges"----and
they were NOT ARABS From where do you get your information
Hoffstra and why do you focus on silly things like "well ---they were named
in a similar manner" ------they have no cultural or familial link whatsoever.
They had a written language sorta close to PHONECIAN -----and a religion --
and a national identity

 

[Hoffstra]

No it isn't -----Philistines are the people who lived for a fairly short
time in and around Ashkelon ----biblical times of "judges"----and
they were NOT ARABS From where do you get your information
Hoffstra and why do you focus on silly things like "well ---they were named
in a similar manner" ------they have no cultural or familial link whatsoever.
They had a written language sorta close to PHONECIAN -----and a religion --
and a national identity

Philistine and Phoenician are completely different, you idiot.

 

[Jroc]

No it isn't -----Philistines are the people who lived for a fairly short
time in and around Ashkelon ----biblical times of "judges"----and
they were NOT ARABS From where do you get your information
Hoffstra and why do you focus on silly things like "well ---they were named
in a similar manner" ------they have no cultural or familial link whatsoever.
They had a written language sorta close to PHONECIAN -----and a religion --
and a national identity

Philistine and Phoenician are completely different, you idiot.

And both people no longer exist idiot, as well as the Canaanites, Moabites, Hittites ect...

 

[Roudy]

As usual Haffbrain never has a point. Walk and Wok sound the same. So do bare and bear. OK so? Here, you want a cookie for that discovery? What a friggin nitwit. Ha ha ha.