Leo123
Diamond Member
- Aug 26, 2017
- 31,691
- 24,502
- 2,915
Fake dossier for one. The FBI claimed under oath to the court it was verified when it was not. It was all hearsay and lies.Exam
Example?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fake dossier for one. The FBI claimed under oath to the court it was verified when it was not. It was all hearsay and lies.Exam
Example?
Because they don't serve Miss Piggy's purposes.Why weren't they invited instead of the hearsay lady?
You have no point.Because he's doing so intentionally.
Because he was trying to manipulate her testimony?Why? Because the MSM has been going after Trump ever since 2016. They hate the fact that Trump nailed them as fake news. Nothing in her testimony matters because it went unchallenged in that committee. There is not one eye witness.
Another interesting factoid:
"Before the hearings began on June 6th, Hutchinson changed her lawyer. She was previously represented by Stefan Passantino, who is well connected with Trump’s circle and served as a White House ethics lawyer from 2016-2018."
Witness: Cassidy Hutchinson | January 6th
Who is Cassidy Hutchinson and why she was called to testify in front of the January 6th Committee.www.jan-6.com
Why would she do this?
Liberals never want proof nor solutions. They craft endless causes formed from fake.People in this thread asking for "proof": are you really interested in the proof or some way to justify your biases?
OR her current lawyers are trying to manipulate her testimony? But, then again, her testimony IS all hearsay anyway.Because he was trying to manipulate her testimony?
There was plenty of evidence backing up the more serious testimony.Nothing in her testimony matters because it went unchallenged in that committee. There is not one eye witness.
Guns are legal in America. Look up the 2nd amendment. Texts and emails from who or whom? But wait!! What about all those emails from Hillary and Hunter Biden? Do you stand by those too?There was plenty of evidence backing up the more serious testimony.
Maybe you missed the SS audio noting guns were found?
There text messages and e-mails as well
Why don't you ask about it from your committee? They are the ones suppressing the information. Better yet ask MSNBC who has the testimony in hand.
Point being that there were guns at the rally and at the CapitolGuns are legal in America. Look up the 2nd amendment. Texts and emails from who or whom?
It has been asserted hundreds of times by occupants of Trumpworld........the collusion hoax. It comes up in all manner of contexts. Most recently as a way to dismiss the 1/6 committee's work. Let's see what the facts say.You want me to research your posts in that era..................You swallowed the Mueller thing whole self loathing person
Every single one of you who's crying hearsay should really learn about the difference between a congressional hearing and a trial.OR her current lawyers are trying to manipulate her testimony? But, then again, her testimony IS all hearsay anyway.
.......after being told there were people in possession of guns identified by police.Point being that Trump wanted metal detectors removed
I'm sorry to tell you but I don't believe you know what proof is.Liberals never want proof nor solutions. They craft endless causes formed from fake.
Every single one of you who's crying hearsay should really learn about the difference between a congressional hearing and a trial.
Every single one of you who's crying hearsay should really, REALLY learn what hearsay actually is.
But in the interest of fairness. The problem with hearsay is that it is unreliable right? So I'm guessing you guys wouldn't object to all the people that Hutchinson named appearing before the committee and testifying right? If she's lying they will confirm that under oath and you all can "own the libs"? win, win?
Your nitpicking about hearings versus trials is bullshitEvery single one of you who's crying hearsay should really learn about the difference between a congressional hearing and a trial.
Every single one of you who's crying hearsay should really, REALLY learn what hearsay actually is.
But in the interest of fairness. The problem with hearsay is that it is unreliable right? So I'm guessing you guys wouldn't object to all the people that Hutchinson named appearing before the committee and testifying right? If she's lying they will confirm that under oath and you all can "own the libs"? win, win?
Nope.Fake dossier for one. The FBI claimed under oath to the court it was verified when it was not. It was all hearsay and lies.
That’s your problem. You consider you beliefs and feelings to be fact and reality.I'm sorry to tell you but I don't believe you know what proof is.
Wrong Sloppy . Muller did not deliver your goods so you lie and say he did .Nope.
That is more of your FAKE NEWS.
It was not "all heresay and lies.
The link between the Trump campaign and Russia were in fact very real.
The Mueller Report clearly shows a dangerous pattern of the Trump campaign's contact with the SAME hostile foreign adversary (coincidentally) at the SAME time this enemy of the U.S. was attacking our election with the goal of putting Trump in power AND at the same time Trump and his campaign lackeys were publicly LYING about having no contact with Russia.
But I doubt you've even read The Mueller Report....have you?
You just like to talk out your ass quoting what other people have told you it does or does not say.
Right Skippy?