Jan 6 Committee SUBORNED PERJURY.. Stunning Information of Closed-Door Testimony Revealed.

[jc456]

People in this thread asking for "proof": are you really interested in the proof or some way to justify your biases?

The question is what is the truth. Hearsay or agents there.

 

[TemplarKormac]

The question is what is the truth. Hearsay or agents there.

I should have directed that question specifically at the liberals/leftists on this thread.

 

[Lesh]

You know how I know the story was fabricated. All Trump would have needed to do is say, take me to the capitol and they would have taken him. But hey, you seem happy swallowing commie propaganda, so enjoy. LMAO

.

Hey dummy...they testified that they refused his request

 

[MagicMike]

The Agency speaks for the agents. The Committee won't let them come testify.

FAKE NEWS!!!

 

[Smokin' OP]

I should have directed that question specifically at the liberals/leftists on this thread.

So, what DID the agents say?

 

[jc456]

Hey dummy...they testified that they refused his request

You saw the private interviews? Interesting, why only you?

 

[jc456]

So, what DID the agents say?

Ask Peloser

 

[Billy_Bob]

Hey dummy...they testified that they refused his request

You missed that the agents in question were questioned in closed door session.\?

 

[jc456]

You missed that the agents in question were questioned in closed door session.\?

That only he’s privie to.

 

[jc456]

FAKE NEWS!!!

More magic

 

[TemplarKormac]

So, what DID the agents say?

The question should be:

What AREN'T they saying? Are they confirming your preferred accounting of events? If not, you, and Hutchinson, are both wrong.

Given that Bongino has intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the USSS, he would be right to ask for the long forms or logs supposedly suggesting Trump engaged in aggressive behavior toward any of the agents. So far, not even the committee has produced any such documents.

 

[OKTexas]

Hey dummy...they testified that they refused his request

Who is, they?

.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Who is, they?

.

The SS agents.

Even still, they are obligated to obey his directives. To do so would render them as nothing but a Praetorian guard.

 

[Smokin' OP]

Ask Peloser

WTF?
Why can't you answer the question?

Could it be you don't know the answer.

 

[MagicMike]

Remember when no one could question agents? Now one can’t trust them. It is surely odd

I should have directed that question specifically at the liberals/leftists on this thread.

"Trump and his allies have seized on media reports of unnamed Secret Service sources rejecting those statements to paint Hutchinson’s sworn testimony as unreliable. So far, though, none of the people who have disputed Hutchinson’s story have done so under oath."

The campaign to discredit Cassidy Hutchinson has begun

The former Trump White House aide who spoke to the Jan. 6 committee Tuesday is under fire. Defenders say her critics should testify under oath.

www.latimes.com

 

[jc456]

"Trump and his allies have seized on media reports of unnamed Secret Service sources rejecting those statements to paint Hutchinson’s sworn testimony as unreliable. So far, though, none of the people who have disputed Hutchinson’s story have done so under oath."

The campaign to discredit Cassidy Hutchinson has begun

The former Trump White House aide who spoke to the Jan. 6 committee Tuesday is under fire. Defenders say her critics should testify under oath.

www.latimes.com

Show the paperwork

 

[TemplarKormac]

"Trump and his allies have seized on media reports of unnamed Secret Service sources rejecting those statements to paint Hutchinson’s sworn testimony as unreliable. So far, though, none of the people who have disputed Hutchinson’s story have done so under oath."

The campaign to discredit Cassidy Hutchinson has begun

The former Trump White House aide who spoke to the Jan. 6 committee Tuesday is under fire. Defenders say her critics should testify under oath.

www.latimes.com

Why would a committee, with an obviously politically driven purpose, ever summon people to testify with information that would so obviously undermine their narrative?

Think, Mike, THINK!

 

[MagicMike]

So, what DID the agents sa

Show the paperwork

What paperwork Trumptard?

 

[Smokin' OP]

The question should be:

What AREN'T they saying? Are they confirming your preferred accounting of events? If not, you, and Hutchinson, are both wrong.

WTF?
The question should be, why aren't they testifying.............under oath?

Given that Bongino has intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the USSS, he would be right to ask for the long forms or logs supposedly suggesting Trump engaged in aggressive behavior toward any of the agents.

Bongo's a RWNJ, he got to keep his grift going, just like Trump , take suckers $$$,
For his OPNION.

So far, not even the committee has produced any such documents.

No shit.
The accusations just came out.

 

[Billy_Bob]

15 pages of leftist trying to make this into something they cannot...

Matters of fact.
* The committee had firsthand evidence to the contrary of Ms. Hutchinson's statements, from previous under oath testimony.
* The committee having these facts, choose to put forth a provably FALSE narrative, of a 3rd hand HEARSAY witness, they viewed as more 'credible' (politically more advantageous) than firsthand witnesses.

Even a first-year law student could close this case. Political motive can be assigned from the previous behaviors of the committee. No accountability is forthcoming due to congressional protections that are being misused too politically persecute Trump and those who voted for him.

The Committee is suborning perjury for political gain. Every one of these persons needs to be brought up on ethics charges and expelled from congress. This is a gross abuse of power and position.