James Carville: I want to punch 'piece of s--t' unvaccinated people in the face


mvan.png




Moreover, it has been recently reported that NTZ exhibited in vitro inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 at a small micromolar concentration. Additionally, NTZ suppresses the production of cytokines emphasizing its potential to manage COVID-19-induced cytokine storm. Furthermore, the reported efficacy of NTZ to bronchodilate the extremely contracted airways can be beneficial in alleviating COVID-19-associated symptoms.
 

mvan.png




Moreover, it has been recently reported that NTZ exhibited in vitro inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 at a small micromolar concentration. Additionally, NTZ suppresses the production of cytokines emphasizing its potential to manage COVID-19-induced cytokine storm. Furthermore, the reported efficacy of NTZ to bronchodilate the extremely contracted airways can be beneficial in alleviating COVID-19-associated symptoms.
Great, so let's do the clinical trials.

Hopefully they don't show it is bunk, like they did with HCQ and ivermectin.
 

Unfortunately, six months have elapsed until our paper revoking the original claims that led to the current NSAIDs situation has been eventually sent for peer review, accepted and published [33], yet until today, NSAIDs are avoided in many countries all over the world especially in the developing ones and, even in the most favorable situations, they are considered of second choice to manage COVID-19 after paracetamol that does not possess major peripheral antiinflammatory effects as compared to NSAIDs [50]. Ironically, our real-life experience using NSAIDs (ibuprofen, diclofenac potassium, ketorolac, lornoxicam, celecoxib, and naproxen), nitazoxanide, and azithromycin to treat COVID-19 patients safely and effectively has been dealt likewise and much worse for almost a year [51]. However, it is currently represented in a much-updated preprint , in which we also cite numerous references of clinical studies performed by other researchers that further support the safety and/or potential efficacy of NSAIDs, nitazoxanide and azithromycin in COVID-19 management while we also fully explain our personalized and pharmacovigilant approach to use these drugs either separately or collectively in management of COVID [52]. Finally, we suggest that the risk benefit ratio for these FDA approved drugs, which are well known and familiar to clinicians all over the world, is in favor of performance of large randomized clinical trials against a standard care protocol at the earliest opportunity as COVID-19 potential safe and economic cure might be available and unfortunately repeatedly ignored for one year.
 
Please identify the lie:

1. Did health care professionals NOT separate families from patients? Tell me.

2. Tell me about the efficacy of Remdesivir.

3. Ventilation might be the ONLY point here I am willing to be swayed on, if you have a good argument for it.

4. Are you going to deny the influence of Big Pharma on medicine? Really?
1. Infectious patients kept in isolation. Imagine that.

2. Limited in acute inpatient studies but seems to be rather effective in outpatient setting with high risk patients.

3. Why would I try to make an argument for ventilation? Surely you know that people need oxygen to survive.

4. Pharma’s influence of medicine is huge. Big pharma is developing treatments to cure Hep C, treat cancer, treat COVID. Do you deny that big pharma hasn’t produced valuable drugs?
 

mvan.png




Moreover, it has been recently reported that NTZ exhibited in vitro inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 at a small micromolar concentration. Additionally, NTZ suppresses the production of cytokines emphasizing its potential to manage COVID-19-induced cytokine storm. Furthermore, the reported efficacy of NTZ to bronchodilate the extremely contracted airways can be beneficial in alleviating COVID-19-associated symptoms.
Do you ever wonder why you’re always seeing meta-analysis rather than the results of the trials?

It’s because the trials aren’t showing effect for one reason or another.

I take it back. Your link isn’t even a meta-analysis. There’s no text with methodology or anything. It’s just that graph, which did you even look at the graph? See how almost those error bars all cross the middle? Do you know what that means?
 
Do you ever wonder why you’re always seeing meta-analysis rather than the results of the trials?

It’s because the trials aren’t showing effect for one reason or another.

I take it back. Your link isn’t even a meta-analysis. There’s no text with methodology or anything. It’s just that graph, which did you even look at the graph? See how almost those error bars all cross the middle? Do you know what that means?
STFU it worked all over the world.

Again . Why do we have the worst stats on planet earth? Why should I listen to losers like you?
 
Carville's long established Hellish Cabbage Doll
face cannot withstand too many more of his
martian faces.I guess in some circles it's reguired
to be a bonafide nut case.
And I don't wanna hear any mores from his
Stockholm toadstool of a wife.This ain't some
Nursery rhyme and James Carville ain't no
Humpty Dumpty because he's not allowed to fall.
Been injected with some kind of Energizer bunny serum.
So .... Conservative Mary Matalin,Go F-off.
Always taking-up for a nutter like Carville.
Saying crap like ... we'll he's a good father to our
daughters.And a Catholic.
He's needs an Exorcism like Fast.Faster than any
Fast and Furious.Carville has the Furious part down pat.
He's aways Furious over something.Never his Furious
devils Faces.Now why is that.
Because he may require more than One
Exorcism.It's the RITE thingy to do.
 
Last edited:
STFU it worked all over the world.

Again . Why do we have the worst stats on planet earth? Why should I listen to losers like you?
Ha! You keep saying this shit and pretending like you have data to back it up and I sincerely applaud you for producing a source.

But it is abundantly clear you do not understand what you’re looking at.

Your only response to criticism of your data is “STFU” which doesn’t really get you far in science.
 
It is not this simple. I got vaccinated. I am not going to get vaccinated every 3 months.

It's been proven that the Jab actually weakens
one Immune system.That natural Immunity is always
best.Those who had Covid and built up their Natural
Immunity are not getting Omicron.
And Country's with the Highest Omicron cases
{ Like Israel } are also the ones with the most Jabs.
Now up to 4 Jabs being required.
Where Sweden { The fewest Omicron cases } has the
Least amount of Jabs.
I could say ,,, Go back and do the Math.
Before this Newspeak tell everyone to
Not Trust The Math.Bacause Math originated by
White Supremacist.
 
Ib
Ha! You keep saying this shit and pretending like you have data to back it up and I sincerely applaud you for producing a source.

But it is abundantly clear you do not understand what you’re looking at.

Your only response to criticism of your data is “STFU” which doesn’t really get you far in science.
Posted tons of studies you fing Quack. Now go be Pfizers bitch.
 
Ib

Posted tons of studies you fing Quack. Now go be Pfizers bitch.
You posted tons of studies you don’t understand in the least and most of which show no benefit. I picked one that showed the biggest benefit in ICU admission. It’s Calderon published Nov 2021.


The study population wasn’t randomized, which is a pretty important thing when you’re doing clinical trials which even someone as poorly informed as you would probably know. And why did they randomize their study?

It was too hard.

“through a non-randomized method, due to the technical difficulty of having a person in charge in the randomization process 24 hours a day for more than one hospital, two groups were compared”

But it’s even worse. The study was intended to compare HCQ and NTZ plus HCQ. Somehow they did their analysis on people who didn’t even get HCQ, meaning their study was based entirely on people who did not even adhere to their study protocol. Some really great quality control there.

“The small sample of NTZ only treated arm were protocol “deviations” as they did not receive HCQ in addition”

So what study did you think was so great?
 
Good for you grandpa.

You still got 4 doses.

Want to know something crazy about oral polio vaccine? Causes polio on occasion.

And I didn't get polio. I wasn't given a moving target speech about it either.
 
He’s in a hospital setting. An allergic reaction would be promptly addressed and the risk minimal.

So you’re weighing a theoretical risk against a very real risk?

Allergic reaction isn't theoretical. And I noticed you ignored the long term risk issue.
 
Allergic reaction isn't theoretical. And I noticed you ignored the long term risk issue.
I addressed both issues, you just didn’t understand given your ignorance. Allergic reaction is a minuscule risk and since he’s currently inpatient, even more minuscule.

The long term risk is entirely theoretical and based on the structure of the vaccine, extremely improbable.
 
Just saying, the wailing and moaning on the right regarding the number of boosters for COVID is ignorant.

No, it's sick of a moving fucking target when we weren't told it was going to be a moving fucking target.

That and the threat of mandating certain boosters, even though I've had omicron and a booster for me is fucking pointless.
 
I addressed both issues, you just didn’t understand given your ignorance. Allergic reaction is a minuscule risk and since he’s currently inpatient, even more minuscule.

The long term risk is entirely theoretical and based on the structure of the vaccine, extremely improbable.

Still risks no matter how much you whitewash them.

Now lets go over the allergic reaction risks and long term risks when talking about immunizing healthy people under 30.
 
Still risks no matter how much you whitewash them.

Now lets go over the allergic reaction risks and long term risks when talking about immunizing healthy people under 30.
Remember, this was a conversation that started by people accusing the medical community of not providing medical care for the unvaccinated.

When it’s just the transplant program enforcing a common sense requirement to be listed (one of many).
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom