Jacksonville billboard: 'The NRA is a terrorist organization'

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Advocating against the 2nd Amendment is unAmerican. Doing so will blow up in Democrat's faces like a product purchased from ACME industries by Wile E. Coyote.

and Camera Hogg is Duck Rogers

 

[emilynghiem]

I enjoyed this one also

Vehicles from the motorcade carrying President Donald Trump pass a billboard calling for impeachment on the way to Mar-A-Lago this evening.

So is this a claim that there is a group monitoring our Presidents movements by targeting him in this case with a billboard ?? What if it wasn't a billboard ?? I think it might be highly illegal to monitor a presidents movements in this way.

Monitor his movements? Lololol....putting up a billboard between the airport and Mar-A-Lago might be a mental challenge for the Right.

Depends on if it was known that the Presidents motorcade was to pass by this billboard in which was the reason the site was chosen for the signage that would be directed at the motorcade if was the case.

And what would be the problem with that? There are only a couple of roads into Mar-a-Lago.

You seem to be suggesting that the billboard put POTUS in danger. LoL

. Nope you don't understand... The point is that if the bill boards were placed in his path in hopes to target him for a response, then the same could be looked at by others whom may not be as kind in their messaging. So the question is whether or not his motorcade was targeted by the placement of the message upon the bill boards that lay within the motorcade route.

Do you think it would be legal to send a message by jumping out from behind the billboard to throw water balloons at the motorcade as it passed by ??

Dear beagle9
Isn't the point to get media coverage?
Whether or not Trump responds, or the NRA or Rush Limbaugh.
Even if all the billboards get is viral posting and sharing on tweets or FB
isn't that what they are trying to do?

 

[emilynghiem]

Advocating against the 2nd Amendment is unAmerican. Doing so will blow up in Democrat's faces like a product purchased from ACME industries by Wile E. Coyote.

Most Americans favor more gun control.

Dear JoeB131
More Americans also preferred to leave bathroom policies alone.
But that didn't stop a small fraction of 1 percent to lobby
to change the policy for just a small fraction of the population to get their way over everyone else.

Being Buddhist or Hindu may be a small percentage
but that doesn't give people or govt the right to pass
laws infringing on those people's beliefs.

Govt is supposed to be least restrictive when it comes to compelling interests.

What needs to be the standard is CONSENT of the governed.
Laws as social contracts are supposed to under terms that
the parties consent to in order to be legally binding.

We've lost our common sense because people are so afraid
of opposition they are used to bullying by political party to get their way.

If we treated religions that way, we'd have Hindus and Muslims bullying
to get Courts to push their beliefs and remove the others.
Govt is supposed to remain neutral when it comes to beliefs,
and neither prohibit nor establish but respect free exercise by free choice.

We need to recognize that gun rights, abortion rights, marriage rights,
right to life and right to health care involve Political Beliefs and start
treating these equally as we would for religious beliefs. otherwise
it's discrimination by creed to overrule people's beliefs "unless they are in the majority"

By that criteria, the Christians in the majority would rule over LGBT in the minority.
So if that isn't fair, then neither is it fair to treat other groups and creeds that way.

 

[DrLove]

So is this a claim that there is a group monitoring our Presidents movements by targeting him in this case with a billboard ?? What if it wasn't a billboard ?? I think it might be highly illegal to monitor a presidents movements in this way.

Monitor his movements? Lololol....putting up a billboard between the airport and Mar-A-Lago might be a mental challenge for the Right.

Depends on if it was known that the Presidents motorcade was to pass by this billboard in which was the reason the site was chosen for the signage that would be directed at the motorcade if was the case.

And what would be the problem with that? There are only a couple of roads into Mar-a-Lago.

You seem to be suggesting that the billboard put POTUS in danger. LoL

. Nope you don't understand... The point is that if the bill boards were placed in his path in hopes to target him for a response, then the same could be looked at by others whom may not be as kind in their messaging. So the question is whether or not his motorcade was targeted by the placement of the message upon the bill boards that lay within the motorcade route.

Do you think it would be legal to send a message by jumping out from behind the billboard to throw water balloons at the motorcade as it passed by ??

Dear beagle9
Isn't the point to get media coverage?
Whether or not Trump responds, or the NRA or Rush Limbaugh.
Even if all the billboards get is viral posting and sharing on tweets or FB
isn't that what they are trying to do?

I've given up trying to figure out WTF beagle9 is talking about.

 

[beagle9]

So is this a claim that there is a group monitoring our Presidents movements by targeting him in this case with a billboard ?? What if it wasn't a billboard ?? I think it might be highly illegal to monitor a presidents movements in this way.

Monitor his movements? Lololol....putting up a billboard between the airport and Mar-A-Lago might be a mental challenge for the Right.

Depends on if it was known that the Presidents motorcade was to pass by this billboard in which was the reason the site was chosen for the signage that would be directed at the motorcade if was the case.

And what would be the problem with that? There are only a couple of roads into Mar-a-Lago.

You seem to be suggesting that the billboard put POTUS in danger. LoL

. Nope you don't understand... The point is that if the bill boards were placed in his path in hopes to target him for a response, then the same could be looked at by others whom may not be as kind in their messaging. So the question is whether or not his motorcade was targeted by the placement of the message upon the bill boards that lay within the motorcade route.

Do you think it would be legal to send a message by jumping out from behind the billboard to throw water balloons at the motorcade as it passed by ??

Dear beagle9
Isn't the point to get media coverage?
Whether or not Trump responds, or the NRA or Rush Limbaugh.
Even if all the billboards get is viral posting and sharing on tweets or FB
isn't that what they are trying to do?

I was curious about the specific targeting aspect of it, because someone on here was laughing and boasting about the one billboard being placed in the motorcade route for Trump to read on his way to Mara-lago (even showing the SUVs passing the billboard), in which was shocking if think about it..... Isn't it highly illegal to target the motorcade even if it is with a message upon a billboard that was placed into the route like that ?? Otherwise what were the implications found in this act of targeting ??

Citizens need to becareful. They might violate something, and then didn't realize that they did.

 

[bodecea]

Monitor his movements? Lololol....putting up a billboard between the airport and Mar-A-Lago might be a mental challenge for the Right.

Depends on if it was known that the Presidents motorcade was to pass by this billboard in which was the reason the site was chosen for the signage that would be directed at the motorcade if was the case.

And what would be the problem with that? There are only a couple of roads into Mar-a-Lago.

You seem to be suggesting that the billboard put POTUS in danger. LoL

. Nope you don't understand... The point is that if the bill boards were placed in his path in hopes to target him for a response, then the same could be looked at by others whom may not be as kind in their messaging. So the question is whether or not his motorcade was targeted by the placement of the message upon the bill boards that lay within the motorcade route.

Do you think it would be legal to send a message by jumping out from behind the billboard to throw water balloons at the motorcade as it passed by ??

Dear beagle9
Isn't the point to get media coverage?
Whether or not Trump responds, or the NRA or Rush Limbaugh.
Even if all the billboards get is viral posting and sharing on tweets or FB
isn't that what they are trying to do?

I was curious about the specific targeting aspect of it, because someone on here was laughing and boasting about the one billboard being placed in the motorcade route for Trump to read on his way to Mara-lago (even showing the SUVs passing the billboard), in which was shocking if think about it..... Isn't it highly illegal to target the motorcade even if it is with a message upon a billboard that was placed into the route like that ?? Otherwise what were the implications found in this act of targeting ??

Citizens need to becareful. They might violate something, and then didn't realize that they did.

How is it illegal?

 

[beagle9]

Depends on if it was known that the Presidents motorcade was to pass by this billboard in which was the reason the site was chosen for the signage that would be directed at the motorcade if was the case.

And what would be the problem with that? There are only a couple of roads into Mar-a-Lago.

You seem to be suggesting that the billboard put POTUS in danger. LoL

. Nope you don't understand... The point is that if the bill boards were placed in his path in hopes to target him for a response, then the same could be looked at by others whom may not be as kind in their messaging. So the question is whether or not his motorcade was targeted by the placement of the message upon the bill boards that lay within the motorcade route.

Do you think it would be legal to send a message by jumping out from behind the billboard to throw water balloons at the motorcade as it passed by ??

Dear beagle9
Isn't the point to get media coverage?
Whether or not Trump responds, or the NRA or Rush Limbaugh.
Even if all the billboards get is viral posting and sharing on tweets or FB
isn't that what they are trying to do?

I was curious about the specific targeting aspect of it, because someone on here was laughing and boasting about the one billboard being placed in the motorcade route for Trump to read on his way to Mara-lago (even showing the SUVs passing the billboard), in which was shocking if think about it..... Isn't it highly illegal to target the motorcade even if it is with a message upon a billboard that was placed into the route like that ?? Otherwise what were the implications found in this act of targeting ??

Citizens need to becareful. They might violate something, and then didn't realize that they did.

How is it illegal?

Showing the motorcade passing the billboard, and claiming the intent was for the President to be forced to read it for laughs of those who targeted the motorcade for that reasoning ?? What if that was an IED, and not a billboard being used ??

 

[DrLove]

And what would be the problem with that? There are only a couple of roads into Mar-a-Lago.

You seem to be suggesting that the billboard put POTUS in danger. LoL

. Nope you don't understand... The point is that if the bill boards were placed in his path in hopes to target him for a response, then the same could be looked at by others whom may not be as kind in their messaging. So the question is whether or not his motorcade was targeted by the placement of the message upon the bill boards that lay within the motorcade route.

Do you think it would be legal to send a message by jumping out from behind the billboard to throw water balloons at the motorcade as it passed by ??

Dear beagle9
Isn't the point to get media coverage?
Whether or not Trump responds, or the NRA or Rush Limbaugh.
Even if all the billboards get is viral posting and sharing on tweets or FB
isn't that what they are trying to do?

I was curious about the specific targeting aspect of it, because someone on here was laughing and boasting about the one billboard being placed in the motorcade route for Trump to read on his way to Mara-lago (even showing the SUVs passing the billboard), in which was shocking if think about it..... Isn't it highly illegal to target the motorcade even if it is with a message upon a billboard that was placed into the route like that ?? Otherwise what were the implications found in this act of targeting ??

Citizens need to becareful. They might violate something, and then didn't realize that they did.

How is it illegal?

Showing the motorcade passing the billboard, and claiming the intent was for the President to be forced to read it for laughs of those who targeted the motorcade for that reasoning ?? What if that was an IED, and not a billboard being used ??

You're making less and less sense with every post. Quit while yer behind

 

[DrLove]

Monitor his movements? Lololol....putting up a billboard between the airport and Mar-A-Lago might be a mental challenge for the Right.

Depends on if it was known that the Presidents motorcade was to pass by this billboard in which was the reason the site was chosen for the signage that would be directed at the motorcade if was the case.

And what would be the problem with that? There are only a couple of roads into Mar-a-Lago.

You seem to be suggesting that the billboard put POTUS in danger. LoL

. Nope you don't understand... The point is that if the bill boards were placed in his path in hopes to target him for a response, then the same could be looked at by others whom may not be as kind in their messaging. So the question is whether or not his motorcade was targeted by the placement of the message upon the bill boards that lay within the motorcade route.

Do you think it would be legal to send a message by jumping out from behind the billboard to throw water balloons at the motorcade as it passed by ??

Dear beagle9
Isn't the point to get media coverage?
Whether or not Trump responds, or the NRA or Rush Limbaugh.
Even if all the billboards get is viral posting and sharing on tweets or FB
isn't that what they are trying to do?

I was curious about the specific targeting aspect of it, because someone on here was laughing and boasting about the one billboard being placed in the motorcade route for Trump to read on his way to Mara-lago (even showing the SUVs passing the billboard), in which was shocking if think about it..... Isn't it highly illegal to target the motorcade even if it is with a message upon a billboard that was placed into the route like that ?? Otherwise what were the implications found in this act of targeting ??

Citizens need to becareful. They might violate something, and then didn't realize that they did.

It would violate absolutely N-O-T-H-I-N-G

 

[beagle9]

Depends on if it was known that the Presidents motorcade was to pass by this billboard in which was the reason the site was chosen for the signage that would be directed at the motorcade if was the case.

And what would be the problem with that? There are only a couple of roads into Mar-a-Lago.

You seem to be suggesting that the billboard put POTUS in danger. LoL

. Nope you don't understand... The point is that if the bill boards were placed in his path in hopes to target him for a response, then the same could be looked at by others whom may not be as kind in their messaging. So the question is whether or not his motorcade was targeted by the placement of the message upon the bill boards that lay within the motorcade route.

Do you think it would be legal to send a message by jumping out from behind the billboard to throw water balloons at the motorcade as it passed by ??

Dear beagle9
Isn't the point to get media coverage?
Whether or not Trump responds, or the NRA or Rush Limbaugh.
Even if all the billboards get is viral posting and sharing on tweets or FB
isn't that what they are trying to do?

I was curious about the specific targeting aspect of it, because someone on here was laughing and boasting about the one billboard being placed in the motorcade route for Trump to read on his way to Mara-lago (even showing the SUVs passing the billboard), in which was shocking if think about it..... Isn't it highly illegal to target the motorcade even if it is with a message upon a billboard that was placed into the route like that ?? Otherwise what were the implications found in this act of targeting ??

Citizens need to becareful. They might violate something, and then didn't realize that they did.

It would violate absolutely N-O-T-H-I-N-G

Can't target the motorcade for any reasoning what so ever.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. - An anti-GOP political action committee known for controversial tactics is going after the National Rifle Association with a Jacksonville billboard deriding the group as a "terrorist organization."

For those driving along Interstate 295 near Commonwealth Avenue and Interstate 10 on the city's Westside, the signage is hard to miss -- "The NRA is a terrorist organization," the message reads.

It's not clear exactly when the billboard went up. But according to the sign, it was paid for by Mad Dog PAC, a political action committee led by Claude Taylor, a former White House staffer for President Bill Clinton.

"It got you to call me, which you probably wouldn't have done otherwise, right? It has people talking. We put up these billboards and it begins a conversation," Taylor told News4Jax by phone Friday. "People are discussing the issue and not just because of us, but because the issue is so important."

Southern Georgia folk making a positive statement for America! So much winning!

Moar....

. Whoever put that up should be sued big time. Hate speech is illegal I thought ?? That is a lawsuit in the making right there.

In reality, that is slanderous.

No, it is libelous. Slander is spoken. Libel is written.

 

[bodecea]

And what would be the problem with that? There are only a couple of roads into Mar-a-Lago.

You seem to be suggesting that the billboard put POTUS in danger. LoL

. Nope you don't understand... The point is that if the bill boards were placed in his path in hopes to target him for a response, then the same could be looked at by others whom may not be as kind in their messaging. So the question is whether or not his motorcade was targeted by the placement of the message upon the bill boards that lay within the motorcade route.

Do you think it would be legal to send a message by jumping out from behind the billboard to throw water balloons at the motorcade as it passed by ??

Dear beagle9
Isn't the point to get media coverage?
Whether or not Trump responds, or the NRA or Rush Limbaugh.
Even if all the billboards get is viral posting and sharing on tweets or FB
isn't that what they are trying to do?

I was curious about the specific targeting aspect of it, because someone on here was laughing and boasting about the one billboard being placed in the motorcade route for Trump to read on his way to Mara-lago (even showing the SUVs passing the billboard), in which was shocking if think about it..... Isn't it highly illegal to target the motorcade even if it is with a message upon a billboard that was placed into the route like that ?? Otherwise what were the implications found in this act of targeting ??

Citizens need to becareful. They might violate something, and then didn't realize that they did.

How is it illegal?

Showing the motorcade passing the billboard, and claiming the intent was for the President to be forced to read it for laughs of those who targeted the motorcade for that reasoning ?? What if that was an IED, and not a billboard being used ??

Was it an IED?.....Your trumpanzee logic is hysterical, btw .

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Most of Jacksonville is a leftist shithole with a high black population. Hmm, it looks like that might be changing.

You mean the military town?....of course, you wouldn't know that.

Also, the one with a Republican Congressman! The shithole parts of the city are run by Democrats, and they have a Democrat in Congress. Remember newly minted jailbird Corinne Brown? She was the Democrat there for a couple of decades of corruption.

 

[DrLove]

Can't target the motorcade for any reasoning what so ever.

The term "target" is a hilarious one. Ads are almost always "targeted". That doesn't mean someone is aiming a gun, an IED or a water balloon at your Orange Dorfus.

You make it sound as if a billboard presents some sort of grave danger to the president ...

Which is, well - - - - > Stoopid

 

[bodecea]

Can't target the motorcade for any reasoning what so ever.

The term "target" is a hilarious one. Ads are almost always "targeted". That doesn't mean someone is taking aim at your Orange Dorfus.

You make it sound as if a billboard presents some sort of grave danger to the president ...

Which is, well - - - - > Stoopid

The ultimate in snowflakiness.

 

[DrLove]

. Nope you don't understand... The point is that if the bill boards were placed in his path in hopes to target him for a response, then the same could be looked at by others whom may not be as kind in their messaging. So the question is whether or not his motorcade was targeted by the placement of the message upon the bill boards that lay within the motorcade route.

Do you think it would be legal to send a message by jumping out from behind the billboard to throw water balloons at the motorcade as it passed by ??

Dear beagle9
Isn't the point to get media coverage?
Whether or not Trump responds, or the NRA or Rush Limbaugh.
Even if all the billboards get is viral posting and sharing on tweets or FB
isn't that what they are trying to do?

I was curious about the specific targeting aspect of it, because someone on here was laughing and boasting about the one billboard being placed in the motorcade route for Trump to read on his way to Mara-lago (even showing the SUVs passing the billboard), in which was shocking if think about it..... Isn't it highly illegal to target the motorcade even if it is with a message upon a billboard that was placed into the route like that ?? Otherwise what were the implications found in this act of targeting ??

Citizens need to becareful. They might violate something, and then didn't realize that they did.

How is it illegal?

Showing the motorcade passing the billboard, and claiming the intent was for the President to be forced to read it for laughs of those who targeted the motorcade for that reasoning ?? What if that was an IED, and not a billboard being used ??

Was it an IED?.....Your trumpanzee logic is hysterical, btw .

 

[bodecea]

And what would be the problem with that? There are only a couple of roads into Mar-a-Lago.

You seem to be suggesting that the billboard put POTUS in danger. LoL

. Nope you don't understand... The point is that if the bill boards were placed in his path in hopes to target him for a response, then the same could be looked at by others whom may not be as kind in their messaging. So the question is whether or not his motorcade was targeted by the placement of the message upon the bill boards that lay within the motorcade route.

Do you think it would be legal to send a message by jumping out from behind the billboard to throw water balloons at the motorcade as it passed by ??

Dear beagle9
Isn't the point to get media coverage?
Whether or not Trump responds, or the NRA or Rush Limbaugh.
Even if all the billboards get is viral posting and sharing on tweets or FB
isn't that what they are trying to do?

I was curious about the specific targeting aspect of it, because someone on here was laughing and boasting about the one billboard being placed in the motorcade route for Trump to read on his way to Mara-lago (even showing the SUVs passing the billboard), in which was shocking if think about it..... Isn't it highly illegal to target the motorcade even if it is with a message upon a billboard that was placed into the route like that ?? Otherwise what were the implications found in this act of targeting ??

Citizens need to becareful. They might violate something, and then didn't realize that they did.

It would violate absolutely N-O-T-H-I-N-G

Can't target the motorcade for any reasoning what so ever.

Too funny!

 

[DrLove]

. Nope you don't understand... The point is that if the bill boards were placed in his path in hopes to target him for a response, then the same could be looked at by others whom may not be as kind in their messaging. So the question is whether or not his motorcade was targeted by the placement of the message upon the bill boards that lay within the motorcade route.

Do you think it would be legal to send a message by jumping out from behind the billboard to throw water balloons at the motorcade as it passed by ??

Dear beagle9
Isn't the point to get media coverage?
Whether or not Trump responds, or the NRA or Rush Limbaugh.
Even if all the billboards get is viral posting and sharing on tweets or FB
isn't that what they are trying to do?

I was curious about the specific targeting aspect of it, because someone on here was laughing and boasting about the one billboard being placed in the motorcade route for Trump to read on his way to Mara-lago (even showing the SUVs passing the billboard), in which was shocking if think about it..... Isn't it highly illegal to target the motorcade even if it is with a message upon a billboard that was placed into the route like that ?? Otherwise what were the implications found in this act of targeting ??

Citizens need to becareful. They might violate something, and then didn't realize that they did.

It would violate absolutely N-O-T-H-I-N-G

Can't target the motorcade for any reasoning what so ever.

Too funny!

I'm speechless personally - Someone needs to PICK UP the bong

 

[jillian]

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. - An anti-GOP political action committee known for controversial tactics is going after the National Rifle Association with a Jacksonville billboard deriding the group as a "terrorist organization."

For those driving along Interstate 295 near Commonwealth Avenue and Interstate 10 on the city's Westside, the signage is hard to miss -- "The NRA is a terrorist organization," the message reads.

It's not clear exactly when the billboard went up. But according to the sign, it was paid for by Mad Dog PAC, a political action committee led by Claude Taylor, a former White House staffer for President Bill Clinton.

"It got you to call me, which you probably wouldn't have done otherwise, right? It has people talking. We put up these billboards and it begins a conversation," Taylor told News4Jax by phone Friday. "People are discussing the issue and not just because of us, but because the issue is so important."

Southern Georgia folk making a positive statement for America! So much winning!

Moar....

I think they should stick to the truth.

that they are the lobbyists for gun manufacturers. they don't gather support through that type of overstatement.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. - An anti-GOP political action committee known for controversial tactics is going after the National Rifle Association with a Jacksonville billboard deriding the group as a "terrorist organization."

For those driving along Interstate 295 near Commonwealth Avenue and Interstate 10 on the city's Westside, the signage is hard to miss -- "The NRA is a terrorist organization," the message reads.

It's not clear exactly when the billboard went up. But according to the sign, it was paid for by Mad Dog PAC, a political action committee led by Claude Taylor, a former White House staffer for President Bill Clinton.

"It got you to call me, which you probably wouldn't have done otherwise, right? It has people talking. We put up these billboards and it begins a conversation," Taylor told News4Jax by phone Friday. "People are discussing the issue and not just because of us, but because the issue is so important."

Southern Georgia folk making a positive statement for America! So much winning!

Moar....

Keep at it.

It's stuff like that increases membership.

I don't belong...but now I am considering it as are many others.

You fuckers want our guns....come and get them.

The NRA profits from Mass shootings...and it's about time that gets pointed out again and again before November.....blood cultists starting to get nervous.

No. Profits would indicate it was a business. Dumbass!