Jackson confirmed as first black woman on USSC

[San Souci]

YOUR METHODS are what's not acceptable here. And you suggested fixes that are BY ANY MEASURE not conservative values. Like JUNKING the whole Federalist/Anti-Federalist justifications on WHY the Supreme Ct should be ISOLATED from "retail politics" during their tenure.

YOU suggested term limits, and "popular election" and then you run from them. And you attack ME when I agree that the ONLY reason she is now on the court is to promote FURTHER polarization and that she is the "first black something" to sit on the Sup Ct because her mind has been given to the Woking Dead about her "womanhood"...

It does seem to be all about identity. Not qualifications.

 

[playtime]

.

You don't need to tell me you have nothing to discuss ...
You have really bad habit of doing that.

If you have something of substance you really want to add, or anything else you want to discuss about the Topic ...
Let me encourage your participation.

.​

i listed her very impressive qualifications & never said that sex or gender was a pre req for any SC gig. you seem to be bent on the latter, & i could care less about yer opining on gender identification.

so that's about it - & i just have no desire to go round in circles with you. now, you can spin that anyway that gives you a tingle.

 

[BlackSand]

i listed her very impressive qualifications & never said that sex or gender was a pre req for any SC gig. you seem to be bent on the latter, & i could care less about yer opining on gender identification.

so that's about it - & i just have no desire to go round in circles with you. now, you can spin that anyway that gives you a tingle.

.

You are the nitwit that made a point about her ethnic background and gender ...
I simply mentioned the fact she went to Harvard like a lot of the other Justices.

You came in moaning about garbage and the only time I mention gender or ethnic background
was in reference to the fact you seemed to think it mattered to me.

All in all, you didn't make a counterargument to anything I posted, and still haven't.
If you want to argue with me about something ... Get your head out of your ass ...

.​

 

[playtime]

.

You are the nitwit​

now now......

that made a point about her ethnic background and gender ...​

oh lordy, i used the words : ' why not a black woman ' .... did i say anything that it HAD to be? why no, no i did not. howeverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr............. she sure as hell is qualified. & she's in. what's the big deal? it's not like she's part of some freaky little christian cult that literally have handmaids - or a frat party boy who has anger issues.

I simply mentioned the fact she went to Harvard like a lot of the other Justices.​

as did i.

You came in moaning about garbage and the only time I mention gender or ethnic background
was in reference to the fact you seemed to think it mattered to me.​

ummmm, what? you responded to me first on this here thread. it went down hill pretty quickly after that.

All in all, you didn't make a counterargument to anything I posted, and still haven't.
If you want to argue with me about something, get your head out of your ass ...

.​

try following the bouncing ball - one that you threw first.

 

[BlackSand]

try following the bouncing ball - one that you threw first.

.

I'll throw it again ... Try to say something worth talking about or shut the fuck up ...

.​

 

[playtime]

.

I'll throw it again ... Try to say something worth talking about or shut the fuck up ...

.​

lol .... or what?

 

[BlackSand]

lol .... or what?

.

Or you will continue to say nothing worth talking about for whatever stupid reason you find it necessary ...

Now if you would like to discuss the topic, or anything posted ... Give it a shot.
If you just want to be an ignorant twat and cannot take a hint ... Knock yourself out and post something else stupid.

.​

 

[playtime]

.

Or you will continue to say nothing worth talking about for whatever stupid reason you find it necessary ...

Now if you would like to discuss the topic, or anything posted ... Give it a shot.
If you just want to be an ignorant twat and cannot take a hint ... Knock yourself out and post something else stupid.

.​

oh please. i posted her qualifications. that's all i need to do on this thread.

mission accomplished.

she's more than able to do the job & she got the gig. it's a done deal. accept it or not; it doesn't matter one bit to me. it's really that simple.

are you frustrated because i'm not taking the bait?

 

[BlackSand]

oh please. i posted her qualifications. that's all i need to do on this thread.

mission accomplished.

she's more than able to do the job & she got the gig. it's a done deal. accept it or not; it doesn't matter one bit to me. it's really that simple.

are you frustrated because i'm not taking the bait?

.

Try to say something worth talking about.
Don't worry about what I will or will not accept.

I am certainly not frustrated with your ignorance, because there is nothing I can do about that ...
Take the bait and post something empty and stupid again you ignorant twat.

.​

 

[Esdraelon]

Looks like Ketanji is a perfect government worker ant.

I give her a couple of years before the media begin to tell stories about how the other justices are discriminating against her. The Democrat party and its minions have become a palpable evil in America.

 

[Esdraelon]

No, but it is amusing watching you morons call her names like that.

Just shows your blind ignorance.

Fact check: Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson child porn sentences 'pretty mainstream'

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's sentences for child porn offenders are in line with many others handed down by GOP-appointed judges and deemed "mainstream" by experts.

abcnews.go.com

"
"In every single child porn case for which we can find records, Judge Jackson deviated from the federal sentencing guidelines in favor of child porn offenders," Hawley tweeted Thursday, highlighting nine cases from her time as a federal District Court judge".

While court records show that Jackson did impose lighter sentences than federal guidelines suggested, Hawley's insinuation neglects critical context, including the fact that the senator himself has voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same practice."

This^ piece is from ABC, hardly a right-wing source. I have no problem admitting ignorance. That can be cured with some study. OTOH, people who will support a political hack for the highest court in the nation, and one who has a penchant for going easy on child porn defendants, have a much worse problem than ignorance. Their MORALS are broken or missing.

 

[beagle9]

It does seem to be all about identity. Not qualifications.

That's exactly what race baiter Joe made it about. Anyone who can't define in the Simplist of terms what a woman is to the panel should have been denied immediately the appointment. We are in appeasement mode at all cost in this nation now, and it's going to cost us dearly.

 

[Lisa558]

That's exactly what race baiter Joe made it about. Anyone who can't define in the Simplist of terms what a woman is to the panel should have been denied immediately the appointment. We are in appeasement mode at all cost in this nation now, and it's going to cost us dearly.

Absolutely. The leftists will excuse and overlook ANYTHING if done or said by a black. On another thread, one of them just said OJ was innocent, and that the black NY subway shooter is being framed.

The SCOTUS nominee should have been eliminated for being so fearful of offending the crazy left that she was afraid to define a woman. That shows she cannot be fair in reaching decisions.

If Bork was rejected, then she should have been rejected as well. Special rules for her, though, since she’s a black female.

As I said, blacks in general, but black females in particular, can write their own ticket.

 

[beagle9]

Absolutely. The leftists will excuse and overlook ANYTHING if done or said by a black. On another thread, one of them just said OJ was innocent, and that the black NY subway shooter is being framed.

The SCOTUS nominee should have been eliminated for being so fearful of offending the crazy left that she was afraid to define a woman. That shows she cannot be fair in reaching decisions.

If Bork was rejected, then she should have been rejected as well. Special rules for her, though, since she’s a black female.

As I said, blacks in general, but black females in particular, can write their own ticket.

Not only black activist can write their own ticket, but leftist in general can now.

 

[playtime]

.

Try to say something worth talking about.​

i do all the time.

Don't worry about what I will or will not accept.​

i don't care enough to worry.

I am certainly not frustrated with your ignorance, because there is nothing I can do about that ... ​

such wit.

Take the bait and post something empty and stupid again you ignorant twat.

.​

<pfffft> you gotta get some new material.

 

[San Souci]

That's exactly what race baiter Joe made it about. Anyone who can't define in the Simplist of terms what a woman is to the panel should have been denied immediately the appointment. We are in appeasement mode at all cost in this nation now, and it's going to cost us dearly.

Appeasing murdering savages like BLM and their running Curs in Antifa is not in the USA best interest.

 

[San Souci]

Appeasing murdering savages like BLM and their running Curs in Antifa is not in the USA best interest.

Also ,any White who is so ashamed of BEING White should get in a nice warm bath ,take a Valium , and meet their maker.

 

[BlackSand]

i do all the time.

i don't care enough to worry.

such wit.

<pfffft> you gotta get some new material.

.

You haven't yet

Then stop worrying, or thinking you need to tell me something else irrelevant.

Laughing at your stupid ass doesn't mean I am trying to be funny.

Fuck new material ... It would be a step up if you posted anything that wasn't complete garbage.

Your turn you ignorant twat ...

.​

 

[beagle9]

Appeasing murdering savages like BLM and their running Curs in Antifa is not in the USA best interest.

I agree that anyone murdering any civilized individual or group of good decent citizen's or people, do put themselves into the "savage barbaric" category..... It is a strange fact that some having specific vulnerable cultural/characteristic's about themselves, are commiting more homicides than other's who have different attributes/characteristics about themselves. So what's up with all the bull crap y'all reckon ??

Yes, some American's seemingly have more and more negative vulnerable cultural and adopted trend's going on today, in which are highly negative, non-productive, and abusive to other's around them.

The two types of individuals or group's you mentioned, might be highly susceptible to brainwashing and believing anything coming down the pipe it seems, and that is something this nation needs to investigate in order to find the culprit's responsible in the 21st century for doing such a thing as brainwashing vulnerable people, and hopefully somehow get to the bottom of the reasoning behind the long term agenda's held by these brainwashed culprit's, and hopefully reveal their method's before we are all destroyed by them and their bull crap.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Ted Cruz shuts down a other hypocritical leftist fool. I'm guessing he was speaking over her limited capacity though