Ivanka Trumps Endorsement Of Goya Foods Puts Her In Serious Legal Trouble

[martybegan]

I purchased $30 of Goya can goods and took them to the food bank...they were happy to get it.....I will do the same every week until this foolish liberal hate boycott against them stops.....

Foolish if you really care about the hungry because you can buy 2 to 5 cans of store brand for the price of 1 goya can

Foolish?..why do you think homeless and hungry people are not worthy of quality food?....and as a bonus I help a victimized company that is being assaulted by street fascists....

Do you really think that a hungry family would choose 18 cans of goya food over 60 cans of store brand

Depends on the store brand and what you are buying.

Store brand strawberry preserves are usually OK, store brand peanut butter usually has the taste and mouthfeel of wet cardboard.

Skippy forever, mothafucka.

And goya beans for 1.89 a can are exactly the same an .55 cent a can store beans

I find their black beans to be of better quality.

 

[kaz]

So how did she use her public office? Did she reference her position in her message?

It’s listed on her instagram account.

Typical leftist. Someone tells a joke, you don't get it, you want to start cancelling people. It's another hack partisan moment for you

 

[esalla]

I purchased $30 of Goya can goods and took them to the food bank...they were happy to get it.....I will do the same every week until this foolish liberal hate boycott against them stops.....

Foolish if you really care about the hungry because you can buy 2 to 5 cans of store brand for the price of 1 goya can

Foolish?..why do you think homeless and hungry people are not worthy of quality food?....and as a bonus I help a victimized company that is being assaulted by street fascists....

Do you really think that a hungry family would choose 18 cans of goya food over 60 cans of store brand

At the food bank food is handed out first come first serve....I think a hungry family would be happy with GOYA products...its not like a store you understand that right?....

So you would rather feed 1 family rather than 3

I would buy at the shop rite can can sale and feed 10

More love spread by me, goya has the most overpriced beans on planet earth

 

[esalla]

I purchased $30 of Goya can goods and took them to the food bank...they were happy to get it.....I will do the same every week until this foolish liberal hate boycott against them stops.....

Foolish if you really care about the hungry because you can buy 2 to 5 cans of store brand for the price of 1 goya can

Foolish?..why do you think homeless and hungry people are not worthy of quality food?....and as a bonus I help a victimized company that is being assaulted by street fascists....

Do you really think that a hungry family would choose 18 cans of goya food over 60 cans of store brand

Depends on the store brand and what you are buying.

Store brand strawberry preserves are usually OK, store brand peanut butter usually has the taste and mouthfeel of wet cardboard.

Skippy forever, mothafucka.

And goya beans for 1.89 a can are exactly the same an .55 cent a can store beans

I find their black beans to be of better quality.

A delusion since they might grow in the same field

 

[colfax_m]

An employee shall not use his public office for his own private gain, for the endorsement of any product, service or enterprise, or for the private gain of friends, relatives, or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity, including nonprofit organizations of which the employee is an officer or member, and persons with whom the employee has or seeks employment or business relations. The specific prohibitions set forth in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section apply this general standard, but are not intended to be exclusive or to limit the application of this section.

I did read it, but perhaps you didn't. The red bolded part is the important phrase that everyone here keeps managing to avoid reading.

No, you didn't. The entire speaks about personal gain.


An employee shall not use his public office for his own private gain, for the endorsement of any product, service or enterprise, or for the private gain of friends, relatives, or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity,

Do none of you guys understand what commas mean?

It's a fucking list guys.

The entirety of the law concerns "personal gain". You're simply seeing what you want to see. The entire context of the law is prohibiting personal gain. Let's however revisit what you said.

Post where it says this : product regardless of personal gain.

I already posted it. I marked it in red. The entirety of the law does not concern personal gain. The part I marked does not.

Do you guys not understand that it is a list?

Then ability to comprehend is very low quality.Sorry son.

That’s what I keep thinking. You all don’t seem to understand that when things are separated by commas, it makes a list.

It’s like if I passed a law that said its illegal to rob, murder or rape someone, you think it’s okay to murder them as long as you don’t rob them.

And in that sentence, all of the comma separated phrases relate back to the "public office". How did Ivanka use her office?

She listed her position on her instagram account.

 

[Rambunctious]

I purchased $30 of Goya can goods and took them to the food bank...they were happy to get it.....I will do the same every week until this foolish liberal hate boycott against them stops.....

Foolish if you really care about the hungry because you can buy 2 to 5 cans of store brand for the price of 1 goya can

Foolish?..why do you think homeless and hungry people are not worthy of quality food?....and as a bonus I help a victimized company that is being assaulted by street fascists....

Do you really think that a hungry family would choose 18 cans of goya food over 60 cans of store brand

At the food bank food is handed out first come first serve....I think a hungry family would be happy with GOYA products...its not like a store you understand that right?....

So you would rather feed 1 family rather than 3

I would buy at the shop rite can can sale and feed 10

More love spread by me, goya has the most overpriced beans on planet earth

Do you give to a food bank?....why are you so in question of what I give?...mt first agenda is to throw this GOYA boycott back in the faces of the street fascists....2nd agenda to be kind to people that are suffering because they are out of work.....so $20 to $30 dollars every time I go shopping to give GOYA food products to shelters is a good thing....

 

[esalla]

An employee shall not use his public office for his own private gain, for the endorsement of any product, service or enterprise, or for the private gain of friends, relatives, or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity, including nonprofit organizations of which the employee is an officer or member, and persons with whom the employee has or seeks employment or business relations. The specific prohibitions set forth in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section apply this general standard, but are not intended to be exclusive or to limit the application of this section.

I did read it, but perhaps you didn't. The red bolded part is the important phrase that everyone here keeps managing to avoid reading.

No, you didn't. The entire speaks about personal gain.


An employee shall not use his public office for his own private gain, for the endorsement of any product, service or enterprise, or for the private gain of friends, relatives, or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity,

Do none of you guys understand what commas mean?

It's a fucking list guys.

The entirety of the law concerns "personal gain". You're simply seeing what you want to see. The entire context of the law is prohibiting personal gain. Let's however revisit what you said.

Post where it says this : product regardless of personal gain.

I already posted it. I marked it in red. The entirety of the law does not concern personal gain. The part I marked does not.

Do you guys not understand that it is a list?

Then ability to comprehend is very low quality.Sorry son.

That’s what I keep thinking. You all don’t seem to understand that when things are separated by commas, it makes a list.

It’s like if I passed a law that said its illegal to rob, murder or rape someone, you think it’s okay to murder them as long as you don’t rob them.

And in that sentence, all of the comma separated phrases relate back to the "public office". How did Ivanka use her office?

She listed her position on her instagram account.

Lol she listed her position

Wheeeeeee

 

[esalla]

I purchased $30 of Goya can goods and took them to the food bank...they were happy to get it.....I will do the same every week until this foolish liberal hate boycott against them stops.....

Foolish if you really care about the hungry because you can buy 2 to 5 cans of store brand for the price of 1 goya can

Foolish?..why do you think homeless and hungry people are not worthy of quality food?....and as a bonus I help a victimized company that is being assaulted by street fascists....

Do you really think that a hungry family would choose 18 cans of goya food over 60 cans of store brand

At the food bank food is handed out first come first serve....I think a hungry family would be happy with GOYA products...its not like a store you understand that right?....

So you would rather feed 1 family rather than 3

I would buy at the shop rite can can sale and feed 10

More love spread by me, goya has the most overpriced beans on planet earth

Do you give to a food bank?....why are you so in question of what I give?...mt first agenda is to throw this GOYA boycott back in the faces of the street fascists....2nd agenda to be kind to people that are suffering because they are out of work.....so $20 to $30 dollars every time I go shopping to give GOYA food products to shelters is a good thing....

I am just telling you that if mother theresa had a million dollars to spend on food for the hungry that she would choose to feed more people over buying the most expensive beans on earth

 

[Rambunctious]

I purchased $30 of Goya can goods and took them to the food bank...they were happy to get it.....I will do the same every week until this foolish liberal hate boycott against them stops.....

Foolish if you really care about the hungry because you can buy 2 to 5 cans of store brand for the price of 1 goya can

Foolish?..why do you think homeless and hungry people are not worthy of quality food?....and as a bonus I help a victimized company that is being assaulted by street fascists....

Do you really think that a hungry family would choose 18 cans of goya food over 60 cans of store brand

At the food bank food is handed out first come first serve....I think a hungry family would be happy with GOYA products...its not like a store you understand that right?....

So you would rather feed 1 family rather than 3

I would buy at the shop rite can can sale and feed 10

More love spread by me, goya has the most overpriced beans on planet earth

Do you give to a food bank?....why are you so in question of what I give?...mt first agenda is to throw this GOYA boycott back in the faces of the street fascists....2nd agenda to be kind to people that are suffering because they are out of work.....so $20 to $30 dollars every time I go shopping to give GOYA food products to shelters is a good thing....

I am just telling you that if mother theresa had a million dollars to spend on food for the hungry that she would choose to feed more people over buying the most expensive beans on earth

I'm not Mother Theresa....

 

[martybegan]

I purchased $30 of Goya can goods and took them to the food bank...they were happy to get it.....I will do the same every week until this foolish liberal hate boycott against them stops.....

Foolish if you really care about the hungry because you can buy 2 to 5 cans of store brand for the price of 1 goya can

Foolish?..why do you think homeless and hungry people are not worthy of quality food?....and as a bonus I help a victimized company that is being assaulted by street fascists....

Do you really think that a hungry family would choose 18 cans of goya food over 60 cans of store brand

Depends on the store brand and what you are buying.

Store brand strawberry preserves are usually OK, store brand peanut butter usually has the taste and mouthfeel of wet cardboard.

Skippy forever, mothafucka.

And goya beans for 1.89 a can are exactly the same an .55 cent a can store beans

I find their black beans to be of better quality.

A delusion since they might grow in the same field

Not sure if Goya supplies stores with beans for their store brands.

Since canned beans are pre-cooked there can be processing and seasoning differences.

 

[martybegan]

I purchased $30 of Goya can goods and took them to the food bank...they were happy to get it.....I will do the same every week until this foolish liberal hate boycott against them stops.....

Foolish if you really care about the hungry because you can buy 2 to 5 cans of store brand for the price of 1 goya can

Foolish?..why do you think homeless and hungry people are not worthy of quality food?....and as a bonus I help a victimized company that is being assaulted by street fascists....

Do you really think that a hungry family would choose 18 cans of goya food over 60 cans of store brand

At the food bank food is handed out first come first serve....I think a hungry family would be happy with GOYA products...its not like a store you understand that right?....

So you would rather feed 1 family rather than 3

I would buy at the shop rite can can sale and feed 10

More love spread by me, goya has the most overpriced beans on planet earth

Do you give to a food bank?....why are you so in question of what I give?...mt first agenda is to throw this GOYA boycott back in the faces of the street fascists....2nd agenda to be kind to people that are suffering because they are out of work.....so $20 to $30 dollars every time I go shopping to give GOYA food products to shelters is a good thing....

I am just telling you that if mother theresa had a million dollars to spend on food for the hungry that she would choose to feed more people over buying the most expensive beans on earth

It's amazing what rationalizations people will use when their politics get butt hurt by something.

My favorite brand of anything is "on sale", that's what I usually buy.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Ms. Trump’s Goya tweet is clearly a violation of the government’s misuse of position regulation, 5 C.F.R. § 2635.702. Ms. Trump has had ethics training. She knows better. But she did it anyway because no one in this administration cares about government ethics,” Shaub says.

Experts: Ivanka Trump’s endorsement of Goya Foods puts her in serious legal trouble

“Clearly a Violation” Government ethics experts across the nation are denouncing Ivanka Trump’s late-night endorsement of Goya Foods as a violation of law – and ethics – especially as it comes just days after the company’s CEO appeared on national television in the Rose Garden of the White House...

www.rawstory.com

/----/ Ivanka is a private citizen, but Obozo was president when he endorsed the Chevy Volt. Watch: Six Years Ago Obama Promised to Buy a Chevy Volt. Now It Is Dead

Even if she's not, I sincerely doubt that the law prevents government employees from having personal opinions and preferences expressed in their personal lives.

And I find it an utter joke for anyone on the left to try to generate fauxrage on the subject of ethics.

 

[Rambunctious]

I purchased $30 of Goya can goods and took them to the food bank...they were happy to get it.....I will do the same every week until this foolish liberal hate boycott against them stops.....

Foolish if you really care about the hungry because you can buy 2 to 5 cans of store brand for the price of 1 goya can

Foolish?..why do you think homeless and hungry people are not worthy of quality food?....and as a bonus I help a victimized company that is being assaulted by street fascists....

Do you really think that a hungry family would choose 18 cans of goya food over 60 cans of store brand

At the food bank food is handed out first come first serve....I think a hungry family would be happy with GOYA products...its not like a store you understand that right?....

So you would rather feed 1 family rather than 3

I would buy at the shop rite can can sale and feed 10

More love spread by me, goya has the most overpriced beans on planet earth

Do you give to a food bank?....why are you so in question of what I give?...mt first agenda is to throw this GOYA boycott back in the faces of the street fascists....2nd agenda to be kind to people that are suffering because they are out of work.....so $20 to $30 dollars every time I go shopping to give GOYA food products to shelters is a good thing....

I am just telling you that if mother theresa had a million dollars to spend on food for the hungry that she would choose to feed more people over buying the most expensive beans on earth

It's amazing what rationalizations people will use when their politics get butt hurt by something.

My favorite brand of anything is "on sale", that's what I usually buy.

Yeah and he thinks I should run any donation by him for his approval before I give.....LMFAO

 

[JustAGuy1]

Ms. Trump’s Goya tweet is clearly a violation of the government’s misuse of position regulation, 5 C.F.R. § 2635.702. Ms. Trump has had ethics training. She knows better. But she did it anyway because no one in this administration cares about government ethics,” Shaub says.

Experts: Ivanka Trump’s endorsement of Goya Foods puts her in serious legal trouble

“Clearly a Violation” Government ethics experts across the nation are denouncing Ivanka Trump’s late-night endorsement of Goya Foods as a violation of law – and ethics – especially as it comes just days after the company’s CEO appeared on national television in the Rose Garden of the White House...

www.rawstory.com

/----/ Ivanka is a private citizen, but Obozo was president when he endorsed the Chevy Volt. Watch: Six Years Ago Obama Promised to Buy a Chevy Volt. Now It Is Dead

Even if she's not, I sincerely doubt that the law prevents government employees from having personal opinions and preferences expressed in their personal lives.

And I find it an utter joke for anyone on the left to try to generate fauxrage on the subject of ethics.

Their stupidity is hilarious to watch.

 

[esalla]

I purchased $30 of Goya can goods and took them to the food bank...they were happy to get it.....I will do the same every week until this foolish liberal hate boycott against them stops.....

Foolish if you really care about the hungry because you can buy 2 to 5 cans of store brand for the price of 1 goya can

Foolish?..why do you think homeless and hungry people are not worthy of quality food?....and as a bonus I help a victimized company that is being assaulted by street fascists....

Do you really think that a hungry family would choose 18 cans of goya food over 60 cans of store brand

At the food bank food is handed out first come first serve....I think a hungry family would be happy with GOYA products...its not like a store you understand that right?....

So you would rather feed 1 family rather than 3

I would buy at the shop rite can can sale and feed 10

More love spread by me, goya has the most overpriced beans on planet earth

Do you give to a food bank?....why are you so in question of what I give?...mt first agenda is to throw this GOYA boycott back in the faces of the street fascists....2nd agenda to be kind to people that are suffering because they are out of work.....so $20 to $30 dollars every time I go shopping to give GOYA food products to shelters is a good thing....

I am just telling you that if mother theresa had a million dollars to spend on food for the hungry that she would choose to feed more people over buying the most expensive beans on earth

It's amazing what rationalizations people will use when their politics get butt hurt by something.

My favorite brand of anything is "on sale", that's what I usually buy.

Yeah and he thinks I should run any donation by him for his approval before I give.....LMFAO

100 percent of the hungry agree with me as i can feed more than you

 

[hadit]

An employee shall not use his public office for his own private gain, for the endorsement of any product, service or enterprise, or for the private gain of friends, relatives, or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity, including nonprofit organizations of which the employee is an officer or member, and persons with whom the employee has or seeks employment or business relations. The specific prohibitions set forth in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section apply this general standard, but are not intended to be exclusive or to limit the application of this section.

I did read it, but perhaps you didn't. The red bolded part is the important phrase that everyone here keeps managing to avoid reading.

No, you didn't. The entire speaks about personal gain.


An employee shall not use his public office for his own private gain, for the endorsement of any product, service or enterprise, or for the private gain of friends, relatives, or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity,

Do none of you guys understand what commas mean?

It's a fucking list guys.

The entirety of the law concerns "personal gain". You're simply seeing what you want to see. The entire context of the law is prohibiting personal gain. Let's however revisit what you said.

Post where it says this : product regardless of personal gain.

I already posted it. I marked it in red. The entirety of the law does not concern personal gain. The part I marked does not.

Do you guys not understand that it is a list?

Then ability to comprehend is very low quality.Sorry son.

That’s what I keep thinking. You all don’t seem to understand that when things are separated by commas, it makes a list.

It’s like if I passed a law that said its illegal to rob, murder or rape someone, you think it’s okay to murder them as long as you don’t rob them.

And in that sentence, all of the comma separated phrases relate back to the "public office". How did Ivanka use her office?

She listed her position on her instagram account.

I think you're going a long way to get very little.

 

[OKTexas]

Ms. Trump’s Goya tweet is clearly a violation of the government’s misuse of position regulation, 5 C.F.R. § 2635.702. Ms. Trump has had ethics training. She knows better. But she did it anyway because no one in this administration cares about government ethics,” Shaub says.

Experts: Ivanka Trump’s endorsement of Goya Foods puts her in serious legal trouble

“Clearly a Violation” Government ethics experts across the nation are denouncing Ivanka Trump’s late-night endorsement of Goya Foods as a violation of law – and ethics – especially as it comes just days after the company’s CEO appeared on national television in the Rose Garden of the White House...

www.rawstory.com

Watch: Six Years Ago Obama Promised to Buy a Chevy Volt. Now It Is Dead

Yeah, but remember how the Democrats all wanted him investigated for that? Hmm ... I don't either ...

They will say as an elected official he isn't beholden to those rules. Of course, Trump's daughter isn't a civil service employee of the government, so her application vis a vis the law is probably hazy as well.

They got their soundbite, that's all they care about.

Yes. Ivanka is an employee of the government.

A civil servant with a title?

I believe her title is special advisor to the president.

Paid? Civil Service? Senate Confirmed?

No. No. No.

Any other questions?

The law they are quoting probably applies to a specific type of employee. Any idea which one it applies to?

It applies to almost everyone in government:
(h) Employee means any officer or employee of an agency, including a special Government employee. It includes officers but not enlisted members of the uniformed services. It includes employees of a State or local government or other organization who are serving on detail to an agency, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 3371, et seq. For purposes other than subparts B and C of this part, it does not include the President or Vice President. Status as an employee is unaffected by pay or leave status or, in the case of a special Government employee, by the fact that the individual does not perform official duties on a given day.

Where did you get the quote from?

The law that we are talking about.

5 CFR § 2635.102 - Definitions.

www.law.cornell.edu

So what agency does she belong to?

Executive office of the president.

is that actually an agency as per federal code?

Yes.

Proof?

The funny thing is even if this ends up as an "ethics" violation, the likely penalty is some form of reprimand.

Of course the real reason for your butt hurt is she's supporting an AMERICAN company.

You need proof that the White House Office is part of the executive branch?

Of course we both know it has nothing to do with being an “American” company since Trump has no problem bashing any number of American companies whose owners don’t agree with him.

Part of the executive branch, but is it by definition an "agency"?

Obama endorsed volt at one time, you didn't have a problem with that did ya?

Yes. Any agency is any organization or department that is part of the executive branch. If it’s not an agency, what the hell is it? This isn’t a serious argument.

Answer me one question. Why did Ivanka endorse Goya?

It's the office of the WH, not an agency. And she did it to poke the eye of the cancel culture.

.

The White House Office is an agency.

Not according to OLC.

.

Haha you're actually defending this? That is some grade a cultism, sir

Great projection there commie. I'm sure you make Raul, Putin and Xi proud.

.

 

[colfax_m]

An employee shall not use his public office for his own private gain, for the endorsement of any product, service or enterprise, or for the private gain of friends, relatives, or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity, including nonprofit organizations of which the employee is an officer or member, and persons with whom the employee has or seeks employment or business relations. The specific prohibitions set forth in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section apply this general standard, but are not intended to be exclusive or to limit the application of this section.

I did read it, but perhaps you didn't. The red bolded part is the important phrase that everyone here keeps managing to avoid reading.

No, you didn't. The entire speaks about personal gain.


An employee shall not use his public office for his own private gain, for the endorsement of any product, service or enterprise, or for the private gain of friends, relatives, or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity,

Do none of you guys understand what commas mean?

It's a fucking list guys.

The entirety of the law concerns "personal gain". You're simply seeing what you want to see. The entire context of the law is prohibiting personal gain. Let's however revisit what you said.

Post where it says this : product regardless of personal gain.

I already posted it. I marked it in red. The entirety of the law does not concern personal gain. The part I marked does not.

Do you guys not understand that it is a list?

Then ability to comprehend is very low quality.Sorry son.

That’s what I keep thinking. You all don’t seem to understand that when things are separated by commas, it makes a list.

It’s like if I passed a law that said its illegal to rob, murder or rape someone, you think it’s okay to murder them as long as you don’t rob them.

And in that sentence, all of the comma separated phrases relate back to the "public office". How did Ivanka use her office?

She listed her position on her instagram account.

I think you're going a long way to get very little.

We all know nothing is going to happen about it. But it's a violation regardless.

Trump is only a law and order candidate when it comes to everyone else.

 

[hadit]

An employee shall not use his public office for his own private gain, for the endorsement of any product, service or enterprise, or for the private gain of friends, relatives, or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity, including nonprofit organizations of which the employee is an officer or member, and persons with whom the employee has or seeks employment or business relations. The specific prohibitions set forth in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section apply this general standard, but are not intended to be exclusive or to limit the application of this section.

I did read it, but perhaps you didn't. The red bolded part is the important phrase that everyone here keeps managing to avoid reading.

No, you didn't. The entire speaks about personal gain.


An employee shall not use his public office for his own private gain, for the endorsement of any product, service or enterprise, or for the private gain of friends, relatives, or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity,

Do none of you guys understand what commas mean?

It's a fucking list guys.

The entirety of the law concerns "personal gain". You're simply seeing what you want to see. The entire context of the law is prohibiting personal gain. Let's however revisit what you said.

Post where it says this : product regardless of personal gain.

I already posted it. I marked it in red. The entirety of the law does not concern personal gain. The part I marked does not.

Do you guys not understand that it is a list?

Then ability to comprehend is very low quality.Sorry son.

That’s what I keep thinking. You all don’t seem to understand that when things are separated by commas, it makes a list.

It’s like if I passed a law that said its illegal to rob, murder or rape someone, you think it’s okay to murder them as long as you don’t rob them.

And in that sentence, all of the comma separated phrases relate back to the "public office". How did Ivanka use her office?

She listed her position on her instagram account.

I think you're going a long way to get very little.

We all know nothing is going to happen about it. But it's a violation regardless.

Trump is only a law and order candidate when it comes to everyone else.

So, for something that's not even included in the message, you think she should be prosecuted?

 

[OKTexas]

I purchased $30 of Goya can goods and took them to the food bank...they were happy to get it.....I will do the same every week until this foolish liberal hate boycott against them stops.....

Foolish if you really care about the hungry because you can buy 2 to 5 cans of store brand for the price of 1 goya can

Foolish?..why do you think homeless and hungry people are not worthy of quality food?....and as a bonus I help a victimized company that is being assaulted by street fascists....

Do you really think that a hungry family would choose 18 cans of goya food over 60 cans of store brand

At the food bank food is handed out first come first serve....I think a hungry family would be happy with GOYA products...its not like a store you understand that right?....

So you would rather feed 1 family rather than 3

I would buy at the shop rite can can sale and feed 10

More love spread by me, goya has the most overpriced beans on planet earth

Do you give to a food bank?....why are you so in question of what I give?...mt first agenda is to throw this GOYA boycott back in the faces of the street fascists....2nd agenda to be kind to people that are suffering because they are out of work.....so $20 to $30 dollars every time I go shopping to give GOYA food products to shelters is a good thing....

I am just telling you that if mother theresa had a million dollars to spend on food for the hungry that she would choose to feed more people over buying the most expensive beans on earth

It's amazing what rationalizations people will use when their politics get butt hurt by something.

My favorite brand of anything is "on sale", that's what I usually buy.

Yeah and he thinks I should run any donation by him for his approval before I give.....LMFAO

100 percent of the hungry agree with me as i can feed more than you

Actually 100% of the hungry will gladly accept donations from both of you, they could give a shit less what your motivations are.

.