It's time to start impeached federal judges. If it's ok for twitter to ban people why can't Trump

[bendog]

ban their objectionable posts and not let them see his important announcements to us, his loyal supporters?

Trump’s Blocking of Twitter Users Is Unconstitutional, Judge Says

A clear example of activist liberal socialist OBAMA judges denying us our rights secured by winning that election over Crooked Hillay! We won, we rule. got it? (sarcasm)

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Trump is the government, subject to the First Amendment; Trump is too stupid and ignorant to understand that, of course.

 

[Marion Morrison]

What the OP claims and what's in that article are unrelated.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Lol!!!!!

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Trump is the government, subject to the First Amendment; Trump is too stupid and ignorant to understand that, of course.

Lol but clinton wasnt the govt when she was SOS and deleting govt emails on her personal server. Uh huh.

 

[Marion Morrison]

In b4 shit tons of unintended consequences.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

ban their objectionable posts and not let them see his important announcements to us, his loyal supporters?

Trump’s Blocking of Twitter Users Is Unconstitutional, Judge Says

A clear example of activist liberal socialist OBAMA judges denying us our rights secured by winning that election over Crooked Hillay! We won, we rule. got it? (sarcasm)

Because Trump’s tweets are official statements from the White House and thus need to be available to anyone that wishes to see them.

Twittter is a private company and not subject to the restrictions of the 1st amendment


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Marion Morrison]

ban their objectionable posts and not let them see his important announcements to us, his loyal supporters?

Trump’s Blocking of Twitter Users Is Unconstitutional, Judge Says

A clear example of activist liberal socialist OBAMA judges denying us our rights secured by winning that election over Crooked Hillay! We won, we rule. got it? (sarcasm)

Because Trump’s tweets are official statements from the White House and thus need to be available to anyone that wishes to see them.

Twittter is a private company and not subject to the restrictions of the 1st amendment


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Did you read the article? I'm guessing not.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

ban their objectionable posts and not let them see his important announcements to us, his loyal supporters?

Trump’s Blocking of Twitter Users Is Unconstitutional, Judge Says

A clear example of activist liberal socialist OBAMA judges denying us our rights secured by winning that election over Crooked Hillay! We won, we rule. got it? (sarcasm)

Because Trump’s tweets are official statements from the White House and thus need to be available to anyone that wishes to see them.

Twittter is a private company and not subject to the restrictions of the 1st amendment


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Did you read the article? I'm guessing not.

No, I did not read the article from a year ago.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Marion Morrison]

ban their objectionable posts and not let them see his important announcements to us, his loyal supporters?

Trump’s Blocking of Twitter Users Is Unconstitutional, Judge Says

A clear example of activist liberal socialist OBAMA judges denying us our rights secured by winning that election over Crooked Hillay! We won, we rule. got it? (sarcasm)

Because Trump’s tweets are official statements from the White House and thus need to be available to anyone that wishes to see them.

Twittter is a private company and not subject to the restrictions of the 1st amendment


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Did you read the article? I'm guessing not.

No, I did not read the article from a year ago.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I see you read the date on the article, though. I didn't.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

ban their objectionable posts and not let them see his important announcements to us, his loyal supporters?

Trump’s Blocking of Twitter Users Is Unconstitutional, Judge Says

A clear example of activist liberal socialist OBAMA judges denying us our rights secured by winning that election over Crooked Hillay! We won, we rule. got it? (sarcasm)

Because Trump’s tweets are official statements from the White House and thus need to be available to anyone that wishes to see them.

Twittter is a private company and not subject to the restrictions of the 1st amendment


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Did you read the article? I'm guessing not.

No, I did not read the article from a year ago.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I see you read the date on the article, though. I didn't.

I opened it, saw the date and closed it.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

ban their objectionable posts and not let them see his important announcements to us, his loyal supporters?

Trump’s Blocking of Twitter Users Is Unconstitutional, Judge Says

A clear example of activist liberal socialist OBAMA judges denying us our rights secured by winning that election over Crooked Hillay! We won, we rule. got it? (sarcasm)

I agree that he has no right to block them from viewing his messages.

He does have the right to block replies. Time, Place, Manner.

.